Scrolling Headlines:

Conservatives: The Trump experiment is over -

June 17, 2017

UMass basketball lands transfer Kieran Hayward from LSU -

May 18, 2017

UMass basketball’s Donte Clark transferring to Coastal Carolina -

May 17, 2017

Report: Keon Clergeot transfers to UMass basketball program -

May 15, 2017

Despite title-game loss, Meg Colleran’s brilliance in circle was an incredible feat -

May 14, 2017

UMass softball loses in heartbreaker in A-10 title game -

May 14, 2017

Navy sinks UMass women’s lacrosse 23-11 in NCAA tournament second round, ending Minutewomen’s season -

May 14, 2017

UMass softball advances to A-10 Championship game -

May 13, 2017

UMass basketball adds Rutgers transfer Jonathan Laurent -

May 13, 2017

UMass women’s lacrosse gets revenge on Colorado, beat Buffs 13-7 in NCAA Tournament First Round -

May 13, 2017

Meg Colleran dominates as UMass softball tops Saint Joseph’s, advances in A-10 tournament -

May 12, 2017

Rain keeps UMass softball from opening tournament play; Minutewomen earn A-10 honors -

May 11, 2017

Former UMass football wide receiver Tajae Sharpe accused of assault in lawsuit -

May 10, 2017

Justice Gorsuch can save the UMass GEO -

May 10, 2017

Minutemen third, Minutewomen finish fifth in Atlantic 10 Championships for UMass track and field -

May 8, 2017

UMass women’s lacrosse wins A-10 title for ninth straight season -

May 8, 2017

Dayton takes two from UMass softball in weekend series -

May 8, 2017

Towson stonewalls UMass men’s lacrosse in CAA Championship; Minutemen season ends after 9-4 loss -

May 6, 2017

Zach Coleman to join former coach Derek Kellogg at LIU Brooklyn -

May 5, 2017

UMass men’s lacrosse advances to CAA finals courtesy of Dan Muller’s heroics -

May 4, 2017

The dangers of social networking

Man being the social animal that it is, one would think something called a “social networking” site would be beneficial for mankind. I, however, disagree. Obviously, these sites are incredibly popular due to their ability to keep everyone in touch all the time. I’m not saying that social networking isn’t great, but in many ways, these sites could be interpreted as vastly detrimental to the way we, as humans, function. 

While research on the subject is still in its relative infancy, researchers are already alluding to the potential problems that could arise from a society in which Facebook interaction is the norm.

One factor being affected by these sites is how we process information. A popular feature on sites like Facebook and Twitter is the “status update” feature. Experts say that taking in large amounts of personal information can be detrimental to one’s ability to react to it.

According to an article on, “Modern scientists say: Every interaction with others needs time, and the processing of the received information is often related to ethics. For instance, when a person learns about the depression of a close friend, she has to process this information in order to feel sorry for her friend.”

The rest of the article goes on to say that this leads to “insensitive and numb personalities, as they are reading the most intimate and sometimes most horrible details of other’s lives without the need of reacting to them as they would have to in a real conversation.”

In an article on the BBC news website, Dr. Himanshu Tyagi of the West London Mental Health NHS Trust said that, “People with online activities might place less value on their real lives,” which “could raise the risk of impulsive acts or even suicide.”

Once again, experts are trying to say that social networking sites are making the real world seem, as Dr. Tyagi says, “unstimulating” to this generation. This, in turn, could make them lose touch with the real world to a certain degree.

Beyond the effects these sites may or may not have on mental health, some experts claim they may take a certain toll on physical health as well. According to the Office of National Statistics, face-to-face social interaction time has slipped from six hours a day in 1987 to two or three hours a day in 2007. One of the biggest contributing factors to dwindling real social interaction is thought to be the invention of the Internet. 

Now, experts are noting that this isolation can actually cause some negative health effects in the body.

According to Britain’s National Health Service, research performed at the UCLA School of Medicine found that “social isolation can affect the level to which genes are active in white blood cells.” This greatly affects, among other things, the immune system, which leads to an increase in risks ranging from infections to cardiovascular disease. In addition to these potential risks, experts say that isolation can potentially lead to adverse effects in sleeping patterns, and skewed views of morbidity and mortality.  

But the most disturbing part of the social networking fad is not any of the “health” effects, but the social mindset these sites encourage. In a modern society with many problems to fix, these sites promote a philosophy of intellectual laziness and inherent self-centeredness. Everyone has seen peoples’ status updates – they’re the online equivalent of drivel. Not to sound insensitive, but no one really cares that you’re watching “The Hills,” or that you’re walking your dog or whatever mundane crap is in your status update. Do I mind that you’re doing these things? No. Should you waste everybody’s time with informing us about every little thing you do? Again, the answer is no. Some experts think that by 2012, the Internet will be filled with so many “band-width hogging” sites, it will be clogged and “too slow and unreliable for important business,” according to But forget that you’re wasting space on the Internet – you’re furthering an incredibly faulty system of social interaction. 

What I mean is this – A site that convinces you that everyone cares about every non-important thing you do is encouraging a selfish mindset.

Yes, I do understand that plenty of people use Facebook and Twitter in ways that is very productive, and yes, for those ends, it is a productive tool. If you’ve got a friend halfway around the world, it’s a great way to keep in touch with them. But let’s face it – most of the individuals people interact with on social networking sites are friends they see everyday, anyway. There is most certainly a great deal of people who are using these sites in a detrimental way. And that could be quite dangerous. 

Dave Coffey is a Collegian columnist. He can be reached at

Leave A Comment