Scrolling Headlines:

Early season challenge awaits for UMass hockey in weekend set with Ohio State -

October 18, 2017

UMass Professor Barbara Krauthamer receives award from Association of Black Women Historians -

October 18, 2017

The 2017-18 women’s soccer team differs from others Matz has coached at UMass -

October 18, 2017

Hockey East Notebook: OT Goal caps BC comeback over Providence -

October 18, 2017

I’m a millennial conservative. Will the Republican Party leave me behind? -

October 18, 2017

Low-Income Housing Error at Presidential Apartments -

October 18, 2017

Kelela’s debut ‘Take Me Apart’ is a captivating, deeply personal exposition on heartache. -

October 18, 2017

People’s Market hosts a fundraiser for Puerto Rico -

October 18, 2017

UMass does not meet the needs of its disabled students -

October 18, 2017

Do we really need Summer NSO? -

October 18, 2017

A picture is worth a thousand words, but those words are better off written -

October 18, 2017

Tom Petty: A Retrospective -

October 18, 2017

Panel held to discuss the future of public policy and the Universal Basic Income -

October 17, 2017

Reconsidering Hillary Clinton -

October 17, 2017

Trump’s Twitter has unprecedented influence on society -

October 17, 2017

Author and professor at the University of Oregon discusses the push of a corporate agenda through state governments -

October 17, 2017

Letter: Join the movement against student debt -

October 17, 2017

Northampton City Council votes to oppose local charter school expansion -

October 17, 2017

UMass men’s soccer takes on Rhode Island with top conference spot on the line -

October 17, 2017

Fulton, Smith leading the way for UMass Soccer offensively -

October 17, 2017

UMass football players facing drug charges to play homecoming

*Editor’s note appended. See bottom of story.

The lineup for the University of Massachusetts Homecoming game Oct. 17 against the University of New Hampshire will include the four UMass players arrested for possession of cocaine two weeks ago.

The four players — James Carven, Bob McLaughlin, Mike Mele and Shane Viveiros — were penalized with a suspension of 10 percent of their season, and allowed full privilege to practice with the team starting last Wednesday. This punishment is in accordance with University policy and the drug and alcohol policy of the athletic department, according to University officials.

While neither Athletic Director John McCutcheon nor head coach Kevin Morris were available for comment at the time of press, UMass spokesman Ed Blaguszewski said of the general situation, “If the students are able to participate in athletic activities they are currently enrolled and allowed to attend classes. Otherwise they wouldn’t be allowed to play.”

The four players have been practicing with the team since Wednesday in preparation for Saturday’s game against the University of New Hampshire.

All four players are currently fully reinstated and eligible to play in this weekend’s homecoming game, although it is unknown whether or not any will actually play. Viveiros, a sophomore from Fall River, Mass., has started three of the first four games and proved himself as a strong player making 19 tackles. Carven, sophomore, Hanover, Mass. plays majority of his time on the special teams. McLaughlin, junior, Brewster, Mass. is a second-string defensive end and has made three tackles this year. Mele, junior, Sea Girt, N.J. has yet to play due to an injury.

Though the players are allowed to play in this weekend’s game, they are still expected to stand trial.

Currently they all have been charged with possession of a Class B substance. Viveiros and Mele are also facing Class 3 misdemeanor charges of using false identification. For the possession charges the students may face up to a year in prison for a first offense.

All have pleaded not guilty to all the accused charges. Their next court date is scheduled for November 16th.

The four players are also expected to go before the University judicial system, pending the results of their court cases. Evidence from the criminal court case as well as the verdict will be sent to Dean of Students Jo Ann Vanin’s office.

According to the UMass Drug and Policy Handbook, “unlawful possession of a controlled substance is prohibited.” If any of the students live in University housing they may face a range of punishments.

While the University was not allowed to speak of the students directly due to federal privacy laws, the Drug and Policy Handbook states that for a first offense there is a housing probations for two semesters and the requirement of the BASICS I class. For a second offense, housing is deferred for two semesters and mandatory BASICS II class. A third offense results in permanent housing removal and restriction from current residence hall.

Though the players were suspended for 10 percent of their seasons, it is unclear how this punishment was determined. The University’s Athletic Department does not specifically address arrests for drug possession. However, a 10 percent suspension is the set punishment for student athletes who fail to pass a drug test.

It is unknown if the four boys were tested for drugs after their arrest by the University or by the Amherst Police Department.

With the homecoming game this weekend, some worry about the effect of negative publicity on the team.

“Arrests do nothing but bring negative publicity to the school because the local media is aware of everything that goes on with athletics at our school,”  said Jeff Smith, the associate athletic director for sports medicine.

“As an athletics department, we work hard to educate our athletes so that these incidents do not happen, and that the news about UMass athletics is all positive,” he said.

Smith said that drugs such as marijuana, cocaine and performing enhancing drugs are banned by the NCAA.

As the players did not fail a drug test mandated by the NCAA it is unknown whether the national organization will become involved at this time.

When asked on how the behavior of a few students can affect an entire team, Smith said, “A few individuals can disrupt everything. A team is only as strong as its weakest link. Especially seniors, they are the example setters, and if they do not set a good example the younger guys will follow their bad example and it could really ruin a season.”

Michelle Williams can be reached at

Editor’s Note: This story included quotes from Jeff Smith, associate athletic director for sports medicine for UMass Athletics. Due to editorial oversight, it was not disclosed that these quotes were obtained by the reporter through a third party who conducted an interview with Smith for a journalism course. Additionally, Smith has said he was not told that the material could end up in The Collegian.

Although the information used was accurate, The Daily Collegian would like to apologize to Smith for the error, and to our readers for not being more upfront about how we obtained and made use of it.

2 Responses to “UMass football players facing drug charges to play homecoming”
  1. Brad DeFlumeri says:

    These drug-abusing football players are being treated differently by the Dean of Students Office because of their athletic status. It is unheard of for the DoS to wait until criminal proceedings are done before bringing charges against students. This is another step downward for an athletic department rocked by controversy, cheating, and misbehaving athletes for the last 15 years. I am disgusted to be a part of a public institution where cocaine possession yields one a “10%” suspension of a season. That equates to less than one game. The only possible defense to this crime is that the police officers planted the cocaine at the scene and then arrested the students for its possession. This is a pathetic response to a really horrific situation. John Calipari could not be more proud! Way to condone felony drug possession in an effort to save the University’s [financial] ass!

  2. Robert Davis says:

    Is this really a horrific situation? Should they be allowed to play? Probably not. That or lessen the punishment handed out to everyone and not just athletes. That being said, it isn’t like they hurt anyone. It’s a bad situation, mostly for the players, but horrific? Really? As for reputation, I don’t think Umass is very different from most schools who give their student athletes a looser leash than they do other students.

    As for being disgusted by basically everything the University stands for, I sometimes wonder why you even come here.

Leave A Comment