Scrolling Headlines:

Minutewomen hold on to defeat VCU, snap losing streak -

January 22, 2018

America’s misguided war on low-income financial assistance -

January 22, 2018

Blue lights aren’t needed on campus anymore -

January 22, 2018

Cupcakke’s ‘Ephorize’ proves it’s time to take her seriously -

January 22, 2018

Netflix series ‘The End of the F***ing World’ packs a punch -

January 22, 2018

UMass hockey falls flat in 5-0 loss to Northeastern -

January 20, 2018

UMass women’s track and field takes first, men fourth at Joe Donahue Games -

January 20, 2018

Sanzo: UMass’ game vs. St. Louis is a sign of what it is without its grit -

January 20, 2018

UMass men’s basketball gets blown out by Saint Louis, 66-47 -

January 20, 2018

UMass hockey shuts down No. 8 Northeastern with 3-0 win -

January 19, 2018

Matt Murray hands Northeastern its first shutout of the season -

January 19, 2018

Minutewomen stunned by last-second free throw -

January 19, 2018

UMass hockey returns home to battle juggernaut Northeastern squad -

January 18, 2018

Slow start sinks Minutemen against URI -

January 17, 2018

UMass three-game win streak snapped in Rhode Island humbling -

January 17, 2018

Trio of second period goals leads Maine to 3-1 win over UMass hockey -

January 16, 2018

Small-ball lineup sparks UMass men’s basketball comeback over Saint Joseph’s -

January 14, 2018

UMass men’s basketball tops St. Joe’s in wild comeback -

January 14, 2018

UMass women’s track and field have record day at Beantown Challenge -

January 14, 2018

UMass women’s basketball blows halftime lead to Saint Joseph’s, fall to the Hawks 84-79. -

January 14, 2018

Future of Health Care Bill raises some concern among students

Josh Kellogg / Collegian

Josh Kellogg / Collegian

Embedded in the language of the 2000-page Senate Health Care Bill are policies that some student health care advocates fear could change the way universities and colleges are able to offer student health care insurance.

In a letter addressed to Republican and Democratic leaders of the House of Representatives and the Senate, the American Council on Education stated, “H.R. 3590 threatens the ability of colleges and universities to continue to offer students group-like insurance plans that are both high quality and low cost because it applies the individual market reforms to such plans.”

For the University of Massachusetts students, some form of health insurance is required – either a private plan often in partnership with a student’s family or in the form of the Aetna Student Health Plan.

Directly on Aetna’s website, the prices of the plan are listed, as students do not have to individually apply for their insurance since they are based off of group rates.

According to Mary Hoben of the American College Health Association (ACHA), who said that it is “important to have [student health care plans] rated on a group basis.”  Hoben argued that the alternative could be higher costs for similar quality plans.

The ACHA wrote about the concerns of the Senate health care bill’s language.  “Student health insurance/benefit plans (SHIBPs) could be interpreted as being subject to individual market rating requirements because of the way in which the group market is exclusively defined as an employer-based market of insurance.”

Advocacy groups like the ACHA want to address this language issue because of the importance of student health insurance plans for college students.

When asked about the response from those in Congress who were addressed in the ACHA letter, Hoben said that the biggest issue now was the general status of health care.  “The whole conversation seems to have come to halt,” Hoben said.

Karen Dunbar Scully of University Health Services at UMass said that right now, understanding where the debate on health care was headed just could not be done at the time being.

“It’s really speculative,” said Dunbar Scully. “That bill may never see the light of day.”

After the Massachusetts election of Republican Scott Brown to the Senate, health care reform’s future has been cast in doubt. Brown promised to be the 41st vote against the bill preventing the Democrats in the Senate from achieving a 60 vote, filibuster-proof majority that would have secured the bill’s passage.

Letters to Senate and House majority leaders to change the language of the bill were issued in January. Hoben said that she did not think the possible gap in the language of the bill was purposeful but rather that it occurred by accident.

The House Bill, according to Hoben, does not have the same language that might jeopardize group pricing on student health insurance plans.

“The House doesn’t even mention the issue,” Hoben said.

Hoben said what her organization was attempting to do was head off any future issues that might occur surrounding student health insurance plans.

The letter stated, “nothing in the Act should be construed to prohibit institutions of higher education from providing student health insurance plan[s] … The language is a helpful recognition of the important role universities play in providing student insurance.”

For now, however, health care advocacy groups seem unable even to speculate what will happen next with the bill. “Until we know how this is going to progress we don’t know how we are going to advocate for this [change in language],” Hoben said.

Michael Phillis can be reached at mphillis@student.umass.edu.

Leave A Comment