Scrolling Headlines:

Preseason serves as opportunity for young UMass men’s soccer players -

August 13, 2017

Amherst Fire Department website adds user friendly components and live audio feed -

August 11, 2017

UMass takes the cake for best campus dining -

August 11, 2017

Two UMass students overcome obstacles to win full-ride scholarships -

August 2, 2017

The guilt of saying ‘guilty’ -

August 2, 2017

UMass tuition set to rise 3-4 percent for 2017-2018 school year -

July 18, 2017

PVTA potential cuts affect UMass and five college students -

July 10, 2017

New director of student broadcast media at UMass this fall -

July 10, 2017

Whose American Dream? -

June 24, 2017

Man who threatened to bomb Coolidge Hall taken into ICE custody -

June 24, 2017

Cale Makar drafted by Colorado Avalanche in first round of 2017 NHL Entry Draft -

June 24, 2017

Conservatives: The Trump experiment is over -

June 17, 2017

UMass basketball lands transfer Kieran Hayward from LSU -

May 18, 2017

UMass basketball’s Donte Clark transferring to Coastal Carolina -

May 17, 2017

Report: Keon Clergeot transfers to UMass basketball program -

May 15, 2017

Despite title-game loss, Meg Colleran’s brilliance in circle was an incredible feat -

May 14, 2017

UMass softball loses in heartbreaker in A-10 title game -

May 14, 2017

Navy sinks UMass women’s lacrosse 23-11 in NCAA tournament second round, ending Minutewomen’s season -

May 14, 2017

UMass softball advances to A-10 Championship game -

May 13, 2017

UMass basketball adds Rutgers transfer Jonathan Laurent -

May 13, 2017

Is Romney/Ryan the Golden Ticket?

Flickr/James B. Currie

There are a lot of half-witted assumptions being tossed around as this election draws closer. There appears to be a lot of people who are ‘die-hard Democrats’ with no clue as to why, other than that’s what their mother told them to do.

Here are a few things to consider over the next month and a half before you cast your vote in November.

President Barack Obama is a rock star, there’s no doubt about that.

He gave millions of people hope that ‘change’ is possible in many of the facets of American society, particularly on issues where American’s values polarize their viewpoints. He overhauled the former healthcare system; especially when the Rrepublican majority of the House of Representatives did everything it could to stop it. He is an advocate for same-sex marriage, pro-choice and increasing social assistance programs. He ended the war in Iraq, and plans to increase taxes on those who make over $250,000 a year. He plans to invest in new forms of sustainable energy, and wean us off of our dependency on foreign oil.

But is he the best bet for our country’s future?

Here’s his opponent: Mitt Romney is “a Baker Scholar (top 5 percent of his class) at Harvard Business School, a feat he pulled off while simultaneously earning a Harvard law degree,” according to a recent article in Fortune Magazine titled “Romney’s 5-Point Plan for the Economy.”

The article continues to add that Romney, “went to Boston Consulting Group because that’s where the top guns went in his day, then to Bain & Co., a consultancy, and finally to Bain Capital in 1984, where he became one of the founding fathers of private equity, made lots of people rich, and amassed a fortune of between $190 million and $220 million.”

In addition to his own extremely savvy economic and business background, his recently assembled ‘Economic Steering Group’ is comprised of five former-presidential economic advisers, a former president of the World Bank, the chairwoman of the National Bureau of Economic Research, two hedge-fund managers, a Stanford professor and the former CEO of Merrill Lynch, among a few others, according to the same article in Fortune. Talk to any successful businessman, and he or she will tell you that surrounding yourself with the right people goes a long way in business.

It is easy to laugh at Romney’s stance on certain social issues. However, it’s less easy to scoff at his business and economic expertise. In a time when our country’s most pressing issue is a near stagnant GDP growth and an overwhelming debt, it would make sense to elect the man who is most qualified to fix those problems, correct?

Instead, the media highlights the things that should not even be on the table until our economy gets rolling again. Just because Romney has a conservative stance on certain social issues does not necessarily make them his priority. There are bigger fish to fry, and I believe it is safe to say a Baker Scholar understands that.

Romney has gone on record saying that he is against same-sex marriage. While it seems like an outdated perspective to have in our progressive society, Romney is entitled to his beliefs, just as you are. To stand firm on your own personal beliefs is to show you have character, and that you are not ashamed of your own opinions. It seems like one of the only clear things he stands for, but whose fault is that? The press is obsessed with bringing up his stance on social issues and fails to inquire about the things that really matter in his campaign.

Citing the same article in September’s election issue of Fortune, Romney’s plan for economic recovery could be broken down into five categories. He plans to “aggressively promote domestic energy development, primarily fossil fuels.” This may lead to tapping into Alaska’s precious black ocean, but it is about time we shifted our focus away from the Middle East’s. It may not sound as pretty and enticing as green energy but let us be serious for a second. As much as we hate our country’s dependency on oil, that’s exactly what it is: a dependency. Hopefully he realizes, if elected, that eventually oil will run out regardless of where it is coming from, and that this should only be a temporary plug on our foreign dependency while developing a more sustainable alternative.

Second, he plans to “expand the market for U.S. goods overseas by negotiating new trade agreements and standing up to China on intellectual-property and currency issues.” It is time to stop fretting around and confront the competition. If America is to make it back to the top, it is going to start with slowing the opponent.

To “improve workforce skills by transferring job-training programs to the states and going after teachers’ unions, which, he says, stand in the way of school choice and better instruction,” he said is his next fundamental tactic. There is no shortage of jobs in America. There is a shortage of the skills to find opportunity and match oneself with the right career. Granted, the first thing we all want to hear is that he plans on lowering tuition costs, but it does not seem to feasibly fit into his recovery plan.

Fourth, he said he “plans to attack the deficit through budget cuts, not tax increases.” Under Obama’s plan, taxes on everybody, especially the wealthy and prospering businesses, will increase as of Jan. 1,, 2013. This would provide an incentive for businesses to earn less; hence they would have to pay less in taxes.

In a recent press release, Paul Ryan stated, These special interest (loopholes) not only disproportionately benefit the well off, but they also narrow the tax base and lead to higher marginal tax rates to make up the lost revenue.” The Romney/Ryan plan is to simplify the tax code to close these loopholes, but abstain from any increases, which they believe will stifle spending and investment amongst Americans.

The fifth component of the “Five-Point Plan” focuses on reshaping regulations on businesses to “encourage and promote small business rather than swamp it.” This would include reshaping Obamacare in a way that Romney claims will bring down the cost of healthcare. Obamacare will ultimately lead to an increase of the cost of healthcare, Romney claims.

There are people who claim that Romney will be partial to the top percentage of earners and continue to skew the odds in their favor. Why not envision yourself as part of the top percent one day and see how you would feel about giving up a disproportional chunk of your paycheck, because you earned more, the keyword there being ‘earned’. If you earn it, what is fair about giving more back?

I have little faith in socialism to ever catch on in America, let alone prosper. Of course there are certain elements of society I feel deserve more government funding, namely higher-education and public media, but where will the funding come from in a country that doesn’t have any money to begin with?

Josh Steinberg is a Collegian columnist. He can be reached at jssteinb@student.umass.edu.

 

Comments
8 Responses to “Is Romney/Ryan the Golden Ticket?”
  1. mason says:

    Great article, I am glad to see an op-ed piece which is not liberal. I am neither a republican nor a democrat, in a time of suffering and struggle what a country needs is a great leader and the basis of who gets elected should be based on their political and leadership ability.

    To this end I see marginal political skill in Romney, he is certainly an intelligent person and a highly capable CEO but I do not think he has any raw political talent and is candidate unlike Obama is representative more of the team that surrounds him than the person himself.

    I think what we need is a bold and strong leader, a leader who can transcend debate and even bipartisanship, we need someone who is going to be assertive and tell the legislature what is needed and how to do it in order to restore economic stability and correct economic malaise. What we need is a great politician not a former ceo.

    To this end I think obama is a man who has extraordinary skill and ability but has not had the opportunity to fully express that in this presidency, I think if we give him another chance he will turn the country around.

  2. Josh Steinberg says:

    Mason,

    At this point I too consider myself neither a democrat or a republican, but I think it is important for people to understand what both candidates bring to the table beyond what their political parties traditionally stand for.

  3. Dr. Nancy Gahles says:

    Mr. Steinberg,
    Your points are excellent and well taken. It is crucial to rise above party rhetoric and look at the actual qualifications for the job at hand. Mr. Romney’s experience as a CEO of a corporation proves that he can and has created jobs, the very thing that this country needs right now..for you and your colleagues! Mr. Romney also has political experience in governing, that is, in running a state government. He brought mass. out of deficit and balanced their budget. Mr. Obama has never run a company, much less a government and has not, to this point in time in his tenure as Prs. even passed a budget much less balanced one, as evident by the $6 trillion deficit he brings to us. Remember that politics is about relationships. Mr. Obama is notorious for being unable to compromise and to work with his colleagues on the other side of the aisle. The relationships with people of outstanding character and leadership that you pointed out surrounding Mr. Romney does indeed bode well for him as Pres. A man is known by those he surrounds himself with. Mr. Romney is by all accounts an astute and successful businessman. The pres. of the USA always brings to fore the wise counsel of those whose expertise he requires. Mr. Obama has the legacy of a nefarious past with the likes of Rev. Wright and Bill Ayres as his confidants. Your colleague Mason needs to inform himself about what actually constitutes a bold and strong leader. Mr. Obama has had plenty of “opportunity to fully express his extraordinary skill and ability”. He had 2 years of a Democratic Congress and Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House wherein he got all he wanted, i.e, the stimulus which he guaranteed would create jobs..unemployment is higher now than ever before..the healthcare bill, which is a covert( now exposed) tax and which will cost us all more than we can afford and has caused doctors to drop out in alarming numbers. Mr. Steinberg, you have opened the door to the questions that need to be asked. Hopefully, you have opened the eyes of many college students to seek the truth. Very well done piece of journalism!

  4. Mike says:

    Too bad he’s not a fan of civil liberties.

    Mike

  5. john says:

    We all recognize that America’s (USA) education infrastructure is vital to our economic success and is critical to our national security. Romney/Ryan has produced a policy paper on their educational plans. What is not said is that the plan is not going to be funded. The Romany/Ryan plan focuses on for profit colleges and reduction in graduate school support. To meets his goals, at least a 40% reduction in college aid will be implemented. What does this mean for our number one competitive advantage? That is, our colleges and universities? Simply put, it will mean that many if not most colleges will be hit hard. They will be required to layoff teachers and cut back on critical programs — engineering, science and graduate studies. This will have a long term impact on the economy, and will increase the number of foreign visas to staff the industries of the future. Jobs will not go to our citizens.

    If you are a Republican, Democrat, Independent, etc., you need to alert your colleges and universities to engage them in fighting the gutting of America’s long term economic educational infrastructure.

  6. ktabz says:

    you missed the part where romney is a dolt and a robot who stands for literally nothing and will do anything to get elected to feed his massive ego.

  7. Jamie says:

    I do not understand why Romney’s business background is considered to be “expertise” and a point in his favor, when in fact it should be a huge alarm bell. Romney has plenty of economic experience, yes, but his experience lies in doing precisely the kinds of things that caused this economic crisis in the first place. The whole purpose of private equity firms – such as Bain Capital – is to buy other companies, make them more profitable by firing workers and cutting wages (among other things), and then re-selling them for a higher price. Romney quite literally made his fortune by ruining people’s lives. And look at the people he surrounds himself with, in that “Economic Steering Group”: the former CEO of Merrill Lynch, which was the first investment bank that failed and started the domino effect which led to the Great Recession. I wouldn’t put that guy in charge of running a piggy bank. Then there are the two hedge fund managers… and hedge funds were at the forefront of creating the complex financial derivatives that brought the whole system crashing down in 07-08.
    .
    I do not doubt these people’s expertise, but I SERIOUSLY doubt that they have our best interests at heart. These are the same people who used their brilliant minds to get rich by destroying our future. I’m sure they are very smart, but, you know, smart people with bad intentions are worse than dumb people with bad intentions.

  8. Tyler says:

    Romney created sub living wage jobs. $9 per hour at Staples.

Leave A Comment