Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

UMass construction to continue through 2017

James Desjardin/Daily Collegian
James Desjardin/Daily Collegian

Construction at the University of Massachusetts shows no sign of slowing. With several new buildings on the horizon, it appears that the new Integrative Learning Center that is currently in progress will not be the last major project for the University next year.

Campus Planning Director Dennis Swinford acknowledged the opening of the new Commonwealth Honors College and Life Science Laboratories building this fall as well as several new projects that are currently in the design phase.

The Hills and Bartlett buildings, which are both over 40 years old, will eventually be torn down. Swinford pointed out this made more economic sense than repairing the buildings.

“Finding homes and making homes for the people in those buildings is a big part of what we’re doing now,”he said.

Swinford and his team are seeking out existing spaces around campus for the relocation of some of those people in Hills and Bartlett. Many will be moving into either the Integrative Learning Center or one of the new or renovated buildings being planned.

The Marks Meadow School by Furcolo Hall will become one of those homes. The money that the campus had been saving for deferred maintenance will contribute to renovations on the school in order to convert it to office space for people in the College of Education, currently located in Hills.

“This will be a great project because it’s a nice new facility for all of them,” Swinford said.

The renovations are expected to begin around the end of this year and will be completed by 2016.


Courtesy of UVC-19

Another new building planned for next year will take care of a large majority of other inhabitants in Hills– the Integrated Design Building, which will house the department of Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning department as well as the Architecture and Design and Building Construction Technology programs.

“Landscape architects and regional planners often work together out in the real world,” Swinford said. “So this is a great opportunity to bring all of these programs together in one place now.”

Both the Marks Meadow renovation and Integrated Design Building involve architects that have already been hired to help design the structures. According to Swinford, the Integrated Design Building will most likely be replacing the large parking lot currently located north of the Studio Arts Building. He and his colleagues have been keeping in mind that guests, especially those visiting the Fine Arts Center located across the street, will lose the convenience of these parking spaces if the Integrated Design Building is constructed as planned. They are currently working on finding a solution that will minimize any conflict once construction begins.

The $50 million Integrated Design Building is scheduled to begin with a similar time frame to the Marks Meadow project.

“We are planning to have the hole in the ground within a year,” said Swinford, who hopes to have it ready for occupancy by 2017.

South College will also undergo about $38 million worth of renovations within the year. A new building that will be connected to the college will house a large amount of the English department that is currently in Bartlett. The remainder of those in Bartlett will relocate to the Integrative Learning Center or existing spaces around campus.

Already in process is the Physical Sciences Building located near North Pleasant Street and West Experiment Station. This 350,000 square-foot building will be used for research laboratories for chemistry and physics. The project will be funded by the state with about $85 million. It is part of a campus master plan that was initiated several years ago in order to fulfill the campus’ mission to upgrade its science facilities and be more competitive with scientific research. Swinford anticipates a two-year time frame for this building’s construction.

With the amount of bulldozers and blocked walkways already around UMass, some students may be wary of further construction projects making it difficult to get around the campus. Swinford assured that aside from some inevitable noise, the construction will not be significantly disruptive. He looks forward to the new additions and renovations as an exciting future for UMass.

“It is definitely rare to have this many construction projects going on,”he said,“but they are all meant to increase the quality of life for students and make their experience better.”

Kate Leddy can be reached at [email protected].

View Comments (2)
More to Discover

Comments (2)

All Massachusetts Daily Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • N

    N.Jan 22, 2014 at 4:28 pm

    how about a pedestrian traffic signal on north pleasant by the arts buildings, where i spent literally five minutes stuck at a crosswalk yesterday? it took me over ten minutes to drive from there to lederle, there was a whole line of vehicles backed up behind me. how about the water fountain in the lederle lobby that hasn’t worked since it was installed a year ago? how about the school gets over its obsession with shiny new buildings and tend to what’s already here? the chapel, ironically, the oldest building on campus, is more structurally sound than neighboring bartlett, which is literally being held together with staples. as we all know, its other nearest neighbor dubois has that fence around it because it started shedding chunks of brick as soon as it was built. how long is it going to take CHCRC and all the other new projects to start falling apart? construction isn’t to continue through 2017, it is the permanent state of an age of planned obsolescence; like a razor, a phone or a pair of jeans, the setting of our education is designed to be disposable…

    Reply
  • D

    Dr. Ed CuttingJan 21, 2014 at 8:28 am

    Hills was a Men’s Dormitory that was built in 1960 and so badly “trashed” in 1969 that what is now Residence Live abandoned it — and various academic units used it on a “temporary” basis. And if that was all that happened, I’d say yes, tear it down.
    .
    But in the mid-late 1990s’ a s-load of money was spent on it! A staircase was removed and an exceedingly expensive elevator was installed. All new doors, all new woodwork, all kinds of stuff was put in there — lots of money spent.

    And now we tear it down and throw alal that stuff away? This is obtuse.
    .
    There is also another little funky financing thing that students may not be aware of — academics are E&G money, dormitories are trust funded — as some E&G money comes from the state — and *none* of the Housing Trust money does — it isn’t allowed to — it gets complicated but in tearing down a dormitory and replacing it with an academic building, costs get shifted from the state to the students.
    .
    But tearing down Hills House — and for all intents and purposes it started four years ago when they stopped doing basic maintenance to the plumbing — is kinda like a student who has an older car that runs well and is good shape – throwing it away and borrowing lots of money to get a new one.
    .
    We’d call that student stupid. Well, I’d say the same thing here….

    Oh, and as an aside — Furculo is even older — it’s named after Foster Furculo, who was Governor in the late 1950’s, before Volpe.

    Reply