Scrolling Headlines:

Editorial: Our shift to a primarily digital world -

December 13, 2017

Makar, Ferraro off to Ontario to compete for Team Canada’s World Junior hockey team -

December 12, 2017

Lecture attempts to answer whether treatment of depression has resulted in over-prescription of SSRIs -

December 12, 2017

Palestinian students on campus react to President Trump’s recent declaration -

December 12, 2017

Smith College hosts social media panel addressing impact of social media on government policies -

December 12, 2017

GOP Tax Plan will trouble working grad students -

December 12, 2017

Mario Ferraro making his mark with UMass -

December 12, 2017

Minutewomen look to keep momentum going against UMass Lowell -

December 12, 2017

Ames: UMass hockey’s turnaround is real, and it’s happening now -

December 12, 2017

When your favorite comedian is accused of sexual assault -

December 12, 2017

A snapshot of my college experience -

December 12, 2017

Homelessness is an issue that’s close to home -

December 12, 2017

Allowing oil drilling in Alaska sets a dangerous precedent -

December 12, 2017

‘She’s Gotta Have It’ is a television triumph -

December 12, 2017

Some of my favorite everyday brands -

December 12, 2017

Berkeley professor researches high-poverty high school -

December 11, 2017

Rosenberg steps down as Senate President during husband’s controversy -

December 11, 2017

Students aim to bring smiles to kids’ faces at Baystate Children’s Hospital -

December 11, 2017

‘Growing Cannabis On the Farm’ event held at Hampshire College -

December 11, 2017

UMass women’s basketball defeats Saint Peter’s for third straight win -

December 11, 2017

UMass’ decision to ban Iranian students from certain programs sparks outrage, debate

(Collegian File Photo)

(Collegian File Photo)

The University of Massachusetts’ decision to no longer admit Iranian national students into certain graduate programs has sparked widespread outrage and debate about UMass’ obligations under United States sanctions law.

The University disclosed its policy to ban Iranians from specific programs in the College of Engineering and the College of Natural Sciences last week, citing sanctions imposed under the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012, which restricts Iranian citizens from obtaining visas for higher education in the U.S. if they plan to prepare for a career in nuclear or energy related research in Iran.

In an email Monday, a State Department official told the Collegian that there have been no changes in U.S. government policy or any new guidance that may have prompted the University’s decision.

According to UMass spokesperson Ed Blaguszewski, the University has been adhering to its interpretation of the sanctions since they were passed. However, a recent inquiry from a student forced administrators to examine the procedures more closely in terms of who could be admitted into specific programs and whether there would be complications for Iranian students returning to the U.S. if they left the country.

According to the State Department official, all visa applications are reviewed individually in accordance with the requirements of the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act and other relevant laws that establish standards for determining eligibility for visas and admission to the U.S.

“U.S. law does not prohibit qualified Iranian nationals coming to the United States for education in science and engineering,” the official said. “Each application is reviewed on a case-by-case basis.”

Mohsen Jalali, a UMass graduate student studying political science and member of the Iranian Graduate Students Association, said he believes the University is “framing a discriminatory policy as law compliance.”

“It is very specific in the law that is says that it applies to the field of visas … it is not the job of the University and educational institutions to enforce the law,” he said. “They are policing people, not complying with any law.”

Jalali said the IGSA is taking steps to pressure UMass to reverse its policy, including publicizing the matter, conducting research and contacting the Iranian American Council, which is in touch with the State Department and other U.S. agencies.

Students have created a Facebook page, titled, “No to the UMass Educational Ban on Iranian Nationals,” which features a statement about the University’s policy and uses the hashtag “WeAreAllUMass.” The page had nearly 2,500 “likes” as of Monday evening.

Furthermore, IGSA members are developing petitions for faculty and students to sign and are in the process of working with the Graduate Student Senate to find out what the administration’s process was for determining the policy.

The State Department official said the State Department will reach out to UMass to discuss its decision, and is available to answer any questions from other academic institutions regarding implementation of the relevant laws.

According to Jalali, IGSA members only found two schools which have written policies similar to UMass’ – Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in New York and Virginia Commonwealth University.

RPI’s policy, as written on its website, requests that citizens of fully embargoed and sanctioned countries, including Cuba, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Sudan and Syria, contact its admissions office prior to applying. VCU’s policy on its website states that it will not admit Iranian citizens in the graduate fields of mechanical and nuclear engineering or in programs that have nuclear content.

Blaguszewski wrote in an email to the Collegian Monday that current Iranian students can continue their studies at UMass.

“Moving forward, we will provide current students subject to the U.S. Government restrictions in the affected departments with appropriate advisory support to ensure they are not at risk of violating the sanctions and other applicable regulations including considering support for study in areas not affected by the legislation,” he wrote.

Jalali said he knows of about 20 Iranian students currently enrolled in restricted academic programs at UMass.

“The Iranian community here feels betrayed,” he said. “They are talented people that trusted this administration.”

At least one faculty member in the College of Engineering, Assistant Professor Yahya Modarres-Sadeghi, received his bachelor’s and master’s degrees in Iran, according to his profile on the UMass website.

Jalali said he fears the University’s broad interpretation of the sanctions could expand to include other academic programs or citizens from other countries.

“The only way to reverse this policy is with the support of community,” he said. “This is not an Iranian matter, this is a community matter.”

Aviva Luttrell can be reached at and followed on Twitter @AvivaLuttrell.

3 Responses to “UMass’ decision to ban Iranian students from certain programs sparks outrage, debate”
  1. bill says:

    I don’t see the big deal. We have sanctions against that country, for a variety of reasons, including the fact that they are trying to create Nuclear weapons. At a minimum, I don’t think a public school in Massachusetts should be training their citizens to help with that. Let them revoke their Iranian citizenships, and I’d be ok letting them continue here.

  2. marshall says:

    I agree with what Bill said…….EXCEPT that I THINK it IS a big deal.
    we have to get to the point to where we understand the danger of Iran
    and the rest of the radicalized muslim world.

    There is a real danger from them we have to realize that…….we REALLY
    have to get it. If we had been proactive before WW2 and recognized the
    danger of the germans and the Japanese…..we would not have had a war.
    They needed to be stopped in the ’30’s and WE JUST DIDNT DO IT!!

  3. richard says:

    Not to mention how many qualified American students who were denied admission under the guise of diversity. Billions of US tax dollars also allocated for student aid to international students.

Leave A Comment