Scrolling Headlines:

Students react to new fence around Townehouses -

March 23, 2017

‘Do You Have The Right To Do Drugs?’ debate held in Bowker Auditorium -

March 23, 2017

UMass men’s lacrosse looks to build on three-game winning streak against Brown -

March 23, 2017

UMass softball riding five-game win streak into first Atlantic 10 showdown -

March 23, 2017

Sanzo: Inability to win close games has hurt UMass baseball -

March 23, 2017

Hannah Murphy scores 100th career goal in UMass women’s lacrosse 16-9 win over Harvard -

March 23, 2017

Old age does no harm to indie rock legends The Feelies -

March 23, 2017

A track-by-track breakdown of Drake’s new project -

March 23, 2017

When a president lies -

March 23, 2017

Let them eat steak, and other gender norms I hate -

March 23, 2017

Dissecting Science: Episode Two -

March 22, 2017

Holy Cross 10-run eighth inning sinks UMass baseball -

March 22, 2017

UMass students react to Spring Concert lineup -

March 22, 2017

Letter: Vote yes for Amherst -

March 22, 2017

You don’t have to walk alone -

March 22, 2017

Tyler Bogart and D.J. Smith lead UMass men’s lacrosse during three game win streak -

March 22, 2017

UMass women’s lacrosse emphasizes defense in approaching games as its key to gaining momentum for conference play -

March 22, 2017

Not much is new in ‘Beauty and the Beast,’ though it might not be a bad thing -

March 22, 2017

‘Get Out’ is a satirical horror for the post-Obama generation -

March 22, 2017

UPC releases spring concert lineup -

March 21, 2017

Abandon the myth of ‘apolitical art’

(BagoGames/Flickr)

(BagoGames/Flickr)

I read a lot of dystopian fiction when I was younger. Some of it was assigned. We read the typical trifecta of “Fahrenheit 451,” “1984” and “Brave New World” before junior year of high school. I picked up “A Clockwork Orange” in my spare time.

These books radiate chaos – from youth and state violence, anti-intellectualism, capitalism and totalitarianism. They tend to appear on syllabi to introduce some form of social consciousness to students in a justifiably didactic manner. Plenty of students might shrug off their ham-fisted critiques with a groan – as if any of these novels and others like them were only history lessons.

In September, esteemed writer and journalist Ta-Nehisi Coates visited Amherst College to deliver a talk on racism in the United States. He argued that much of the 2016 presidential election was an effort to reassert the notion of “American innocence,” and explained how the infrastructure of the country was a direct, intentional product of slavery.

America was a dystopia from its inception – founded on the genocide of one population and built on the violent exploitation of another. And on Nov. 8, a fascist named Donald Trump was elected president. His campaign held a mirror to the evils that have burned in the United States since its origin – white supremacy, misogyny, xenophobia, queerphobia, transphobia, ableism and classism – and last Tuesday’s result ignited hundreds of hate crimes across the country.

There is no place for denying history, and there’s no longer any room for the kind of arrogance that led so many to assume that Trump would never win.

Neither history nor art exist in a vacuum, and it’s harmful to assume that they do. Generations of artists – like the authors of those four books – created work that speaks to the issues of their day and beyond. If a work does not critique the ideologies of its time, it either illustrates them in some way or actively upholds the oppressive status quo.

In 1915, director D.W. Griffith released “The Birth of a Nation,” a silent epic still held as a milestone of film history. Its technical advancement largely motivated recognition of film as an art form. It’s also an openly racist piece of ahistorical fiction that paints the Ku Klux Klan as heroes – and it was the first movie officially screened in the White House. Over a century later, a man endorsed by the KKK is on his way to Washington, as Klansmen celebrate in the streets.

1920 Brought “The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari” into the world, a movie that became a calling card not just for director Robert Wiene but also the entire German Expressionist movement. It follows the plight of a man named Francis as he tries to stop an entranced sleepwalker’s killing spree, and ends with Francis locked away in an asylum by the psychiatrist responsible for hypnotizing the murderer. The twist leaves reality unclear, but the authoritarian implications resonate.

1921’s “The Sheik” and its 1926 sequel “The Son of the Sheik” exemplify other forms of violence that persist in the present. In the sequel, the titular character sexually assaults Yasmin, a woman who then falls in love with him – an arc emblematic of rape culture that still pervades society. Both films cast Rudolph Valentino as an Arab man, a blatant whitewashing which is seen in dozens of modern Hollywood works like “Aloha,” “Exodus: Gods and Kings,” “Doctor Strange,” “The Great Wall” and “Ghost in the Shell.”

It’s dangerous to suggest that art doesn’t depict or anticipate the world in which it exists. It’s also simply incorrect. Octavia Butler wrote about a bigoted demagogue who adopted the slogan “help us make America great again” in her 1998 novel “Parable of the Talents.” The prophetic Trump analog was a Texas senator named Andrew Steele Jarret, who ran for president in Butler’s vision of 2032, a time marked by nationalism and antagonism from the religious right.

Anyone who interacts with art – creators, critics or consumers – must engage with it on both an aesthetic and political level. To reduce works to either or is to ignore their complexities, which may perpetuate or offer incisive commentary on the violence and discrimination in the world.

You cannot watch “The Dark Knight” as a comic book film without recognizing that it also argues for a surveillance state. You cannot engage with the stylishness of the “James Bond” franchise without acknowledging its deeply misogynistic foundation. You also cannot simply shed tears at the purportedly heartrending narrative of “Me Before You” while ignoring the flagrantly ableist message behind it.

In 1947, cultural critic Siegfried Kracauer wrote a book called “From Cagliari to Hitler” arguing that Wiene’s film predicted the rise of Nazi Germany.

This spring, a movie called “Green Room” plainly depicted the frightening, nihilistic moment we’re living in now – a time in which neo-Nazis run rampant because the election results ratified their movement. In the months after the film’s release, its allegory has manifested in reality.

But it would be wrong to say that we were never here, or that we were only here in the past, or that our artists haven’t been addressing these issues. So many creative voices have already been speaking to the horrors that haunt our lives – atrocities to which those with privilege and power have always been indifferent. It you’ve been silent before, it’s high time to snap out of your comfort zone.

A white supremacist authoritarian accused of multiple sexual assaults was voted into one of the highest offices in the world. Republicans control the House and the Senate. Autocracy is knocking at our door. Liberalism did not protect us, but apathy will kill us. The absolute least you could do is start listening to the artists who have always warned us this day would come.

Nathan Frontiero can be reached at nfrontiero@umass.edu and followed on Twitter @nathanfrontiero.

Leave A Comment