Scrolling Headlines:

ICE cannot enter Amherst Public Schools -

March 1, 2017

Dissecting Science: Episode one -

March 1, 2017

Challenges seen in reaching University sustainability goals -

March 1, 2017

Question and Answer: Lincoln Quang Duong runs on one-man ticket for SGA President -

March 1, 2017

UMass men’s basketball prepares for last home game of the season, taking on Richmond Wednesday -

March 1, 2017

Emilie Cowan reflects on her astounding season for UMass women’s track and field -

March 1, 2017

Winning in practice meant winning the starting job for UMass men’s basketball’s ‘red team’ -

March 1, 2017

UMass men’s lacrosse looks for first win of the season against Albany Wednesday -

March 1, 2017

UMass women’s basketball heading in the right direction with season in rear-view mirror -

March 1, 2017

Fine dining restaurant in downtown Amherst surprises with extravagance -

March 1, 2017

Debunking three common dieting myths -

March 1, 2017

The future of the pro-life movement -

March 1, 2017

Question and Answer: SGA president/vice presidential candidates Amazan and Sullivan see ticket as politically bold -

February 28, 2017

Bread & Butter in North Amherst celebrates two-year anniversary -

February 28, 2017

Question and Answer: SGA President Vitale and Vice President Wallace run for re-election -

February 28, 2017

Derek Kellogg: ‘I wouldn’t say any starting lineup is secure at this point’ for UMass men’s basketball -

February 28, 2017

UMass softball shows signs of growth in Texas tournament losses -

February 28, 2017

UMass tennis drops close match against Yale -

February 28, 2017

Notebook: Defending conference champion Rhode Island splits weekend series -

February 28, 2017

Four brilliant and unsettling fictional podcasts -

February 28, 2017

Why Democrats should embrace states’ rights

(Daniel Mennerich/ Flickr)

(Daniel Mennerich/ Flickr)

The term “states’ rights” has historically been rather divisive across the political spectrum. Conservatives and libertarians tend to see it as a core part of their philosophy of small government, whereas liberals often see it as a dog-whistle racist term alluding back to the era of Jim Crow laws. The right sees states’ rights as the proper vehicle to fight the overreach of federal government, while the left tends to see a strong federal government as more effective at bringing about social change.

However, with the news of Donald Trump’s upset victory in the 2016 election, we may begin seeing a change to this paradigm. Over the next four years, the Democratic Party may start paying lip service to the idea of states’ rights, in the same way that the way the Republican Party has been doing for the past eight years.

This doesn’t represent any core shift in ideology. In fact, Republican appeal to states’ rights has been mainly ideological, whereas any Democratic interest has been chiefly out of pragmatism rather than any overarching belief that smaller, more local government is better. Instead, liberals tend to support local initiatives when they know the federal government cannot provide what they want. In 2013, for instance, the idea of legalizing recreational cannabis and gay marriage had decent support from liberals who believed that there was not enough momentum to advance these at the federal level.

Now that the presidency, House, Senate and (presumably) Supreme Court are going to be under Republican rule for the next few years, Democrats may find themselves courting the states’ rights strategy to advance their agendas. This is already an uphill battle: as of November 2016, the GOP also has a clear overall advantage in terms of state representatives. However, states like California and Massachusetts, which tend to be overwhelmingly Democratic at the state level, may find themselves pushing new Democratic agendas that would otherwise be reserved for the federal level.

This might actually turn out to be beneficial for Democrats. At the national level, the left is forced to make their message more moderate to appeal to general election voters. This was painfully obvious during the presidential primaries, during which the Democratic Party struggled to balance the hard-left message of Bernie Sanders with the centrist approach of Hillary Clinton. However, when it comes to states’ rights, states like Massachusetts and California can afford to push laws that would be palatable to liberals but which would not be quite as popular at a national level. Romneycare is perhaps the most striking example to Massachusetts residents, but the idea still holds for other issues as well.

Of course, this swings both ways. Democratic states can choose to focus on pushing more states’ rights agendas that would be unfavorable to general Republicans, but Republican states will also be doing the same, passing laws that most Democrats would not favor. While this means that both parties have the chance to get some of what they want, it’s also a bit worrying that this might further polarize our country, in a time when radical polarization has already rocked our politics on a national level.

Regardless, both Democrats and Republicans ought to focus on restoring power to the states and away from the federal government. While few in the media questioned the massive expansion of federal power under the Obama administration, perhaps they will be more critical now that someone like Trump will be in the White House. This may be just the impetus that America needs to realize the danger of consolidating too much power in a central authority, and the power of giving more control towards local government.

Edridge D’Souza is a Collegian columnist and can be reached at edsouza@umass.edu.

Comments
One Response to “Why Democrats should embrace states’ rights”
  1. David Hunt 1990 says:

    The attention to States Rights, and indeed limitations on federal power and adherence to “The Separation of Powers” will only last until the Dems return to power. Then it will be FULL STEAM AHEAD to concentrate power in Sodom-by-the-Potomac again.

    After all, as former Leftist now Conservative David Horowitz says, “Inside Every Progressive Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out”

Leave A Comment