Scrolling Headlines:

Canadian activist and Hall of Fame singer Bruce Cockburn shares some powerful thoughts with William Plotnick -

October 24, 2017

Just in: Theta Chi suspension lifted, once again recognized by UMass -

October 23, 2017

Atkins’ season so great, apples can’t stay on trees -

October 23, 2017

‘The Next Iron Chef’’s Marc Forgione speaks at UMass -

October 23, 2017

Record start powers UMass football to 55-20 win over Georgia Southern -

October 23, 2017

Nashville Predators head coach Peter Laviolette spends off-day in Amherst -

October 23, 2017

UMass field hockey loses weekend set -

October 23, 2017

Minutewomen fail to make A-10 tournament, lose to Flyers -

October 23, 2017

DeSantis penalty kick lifts UMass men’s soccer over Dayton -

October 23, 2017

Safe spaces and the politics of paranoia -

October 23, 2017

It’s time to reform RAPs at UMass -

October 23, 2017

Letter: Hold Clinton accountable for her mistakes -

October 23, 2017

Destroyer’s ‘ken’ is a perfect median of rock and techno -

October 23, 2017

Experienced Ohio State club too much for UMass hockey in 3-0 loss -

October 22, 2017

Season-high 29 saves from Matt Murray proves lone highlight in UMass hockey’s 3-0 shutout loss to Ohio State -

October 22, 2017

UMass football picks up first win of the season in blowout win over Georgia Southern -

October 21, 2017

Student in critical condition after pedestrian-vehicle accident on Friday -

October 21, 2017

UMass women’s soccer fails to secure spot in A-10 tournament with loss to Saint Louis -

October 21, 2017

Struggles with special teams sinks UMass hockey -

October 21, 2017

UMass hockey drops second of the year in 3-1 loss to Ohio State -

October 20, 2017

Panel-led discussion on Women’s March held in Campus Center

(Jong Man Kim/Collegian)

Students and faculty gathered in the Amherst Room at the University of Massachusetts Monday afternoon for a panel-led discussion on diversity within social movements and to outline critiques of the Women’s March on Washington.

The event was part of the “Engaging Democracy, Exchanging Ideas” series, was co-sponsored by the University of Massachusetts College of Social and Behavioral Sciences and the On Protest Working Group. It was led by six panelists who shared personal experiences, analysis of the march and suggestions moving forward for a national movement.

Linda Tropp, a professor of social psychology, started off the panel by speaking on the research she conducted on women who attended the march.

“I found that many people were just protesting for the first time,” Tropp said.

Out of the 347 respondents in her study, 97 percent self-identified as female while 91 percent self-identified as white. From these respondents, Tropp found that women who participated in the Women’s march were motivated by multiple reasons, from the right to have an abortion to racial injustices.

Whitney Battle-Baptiste, associate professor of anthropology, said she did not attend the march herself, but that her lack of participation in the march does not make her any less of a woman. She said people need to understand black women have already been “marching, fighting, screaming and yelling” about the injustices in our country.

Laura Briggs, professor and chair of the women, gender and Sexuality Studies program said as someone who organized a national march in 1987, the organization of the Women’s March on Washington was much different than her own experience.

“People didn’t mobilize because of the demands,” Briggs said. “The march did not have politics except those that people brought with them.”

Briggs explained the importance of organizers laying the groundwork for mobilization by having face-to-face conversations.

Sanjiv Gupta, associate professor of sociology, said that though the mobilization had certain problems or flaws, the event was “a heroic achievement.” She applauded the speed at which the movement quickly materialized.

Looking forward, Gupta said as academics and intellectuals continue this movement to help ordinary people, they must work across disciplines.

Anna Branch, associate professor of sociology, said women attending the march were overwhelmingly Hillary Clinton supporters and for many this was their first time protesting in the streets.

Branch said the march needed to do a better job of recognizing multiple kinds of women, calling the Women’s March on Washington the “white liberal class advantaged march.”

She said the movement cannot ignore marginalized communities and their platform.

Angelica Bernal, assistant professor of political science, spoke from her own experience as a Latina, immigrant, mother of a child with disabilities and as a person with undocumented family members.

“Our critiques of the march are important,” Bernal said.

Bernal said the virtual Women’s March, or the Disability March, allowed women with disabilities to upload pictures of themselves online and post why they wanted to march in order to participate in the marches happening in Washington and across the globe.

Alix Olson, a graduate political science student at UMass, critiqued the march for being transgender exclusionary. She said the pink pussy hats that “[equate] feminism with vaginas and uteruses” are not inclusive to all types of women.

Olsen said in order to discuss framework moving forward, organizers must acknowledge the work already started in the past, such as Occupy Wall Street, the Black Lives Matter movement and the campaign #SayHerName.

“It is clear that a resistance to a Trumpian kind of world does not begin with the 2016 election,” Olsen said.

“It showed that there is a lot contention in the movement and within those who are observing the movement… which I imagined, but it was nice to see them able to talk about it in a good atmosphere like this,” said Cole Coccitto, a junior political science major.

Arianna Lewis, a legal studies major, said she hoped someone would discuss the inherent ableism of the Women’s March and was glad to hear Bernal do so.

“I feel like a lot of conversations that I have heard about the Women’s March are either ‘this is the greatest thing that has ever happened’ or ‘no this is awful’ and I feel there is room for both of those perspectives in the conversation,” Lewis said. “I think they definitely have to all get expressed to some capacity in order to figure out how to move forward with organizational programs like this.”

Carson McGrath can be reached at and followed on Twitter @McgrathCarson.

Leave A Comment