Scrolling Headlines:

Editorial: Our shift to a primarily digital world -

December 13, 2017

Makar, Ferraro off to Ontario to compete for Team Canada’s World Junior hockey team -

December 12, 2017

Lecture attempts to answer whether treatment of depression has resulted in over-prescription of SSRIs -

December 12, 2017

Palestinian students on campus react to President Trump’s recent declaration -

December 12, 2017

Smith College hosts social media panel addressing impact of social media on government policies -

December 12, 2017

GOP Tax Plan will trouble working grad students -

December 12, 2017

Mario Ferraro making his mark with UMass -

December 12, 2017

Minutewomen look to keep momentum going against UMass Lowell -

December 12, 2017

Ames: UMass hockey’s turnaround is real, and it’s happening now -

December 12, 2017

When your favorite comedian is accused of sexual assault -

December 12, 2017

A snapshot of my college experience -

December 12, 2017

Homelessness is an issue that’s close to home -

December 12, 2017

Allowing oil drilling in Alaska sets a dangerous precedent -

December 12, 2017

‘She’s Gotta Have It’ is a television triumph -

December 12, 2017

Some of my favorite everyday brands -

December 12, 2017

Berkeley professor researches high-poverty high school -

December 11, 2017

Rosenberg steps down as Senate President during husband’s controversy -

December 11, 2017

Students aim to bring smiles to kids’ faces at Baystate Children’s Hospital -

December 11, 2017

‘Growing Cannabis On the Farm’ event held at Hampshire College -

December 11, 2017

UMass women’s basketball defeats Saint Peter’s for third straight win -

December 11, 2017

Nobel Peace Prize recipient discusses nuclear weapons treaty

(Jessica Picard/ Daily Collegian)

Richard Moyes, co-founder of the non-profit organization Article 36, as well as member of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, presented a lecture concerning international weapons law in the Commonwealth Honors College Events Hall on Tuesday.

His lecture, titled, “Deciding How We Are Allowed to Kill Each Other: Controlling Weapons in International Law,” explored the process in creating the recent Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, a piece of legislation recently passed in the United Nations.

Moyes, who was involved in the process since the early planning stages in 2011, placed an emphasis on the role of states and civil society in framing issues of concern in developing legal responses to nuclear weapons.

“It requires quite a lot of belief, and maybe arrogance, to go from ‘we’re going to do this’ to actually making it happen,” Moyes said.

ICAN was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2017 for its work developing the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. Moyes explained that the entire process took a few years longer than expected, but the negotiations still went quickly.

Before moving into the policy change, Moyes explained that the early stages of the treaty were developed around a humanitarian initiative. “Having a clear goal” was the start to the process, from which strong arguments and coalitions could develop.

Accoring to Moyes, the humanitarian initiative around which the treaty was based was the “straightforwardly horrific effects” of nuclear weapons. He continued that the testimony of victims and survivors was critical to the eventual passage of the treaty.

“[We, society] don’t have the capability to provide a meaningful response,” Moyes said.

Moyes also highlighted how opposition to the treaty from nuclear-armed states made the humanitarian initiative necessary. He explained that, because nuclear-armed states, such as the United States, Great Britain, Russia and France, remained uninvolved in the treaty process, the “prohibition” of nuclear weapons would come before elimination.

“They’re all in favor of getting rid of nuclear weapons,” Moyes said. “They just need to solve national security, social issues and basically establish world peace. They’ll fix all the other problems in the world, and then endorse the treaty.”

A majority of the treaty process was carried out through the work of non-governmental organizations and eventually was transferred through conferences to the “Humanitarian Pledge,” issued at the Vienna Conference of 2014.

“All this is about normal people finding ways to interact with very high level power structures,” Moyes said.

Rebecca Raskob, a senior political science and French & Francophone studies student, attended the lecture and appreciated learning more about work in non-governmental organizations with different levels of government and lobbyists.

“My big takeaway would be how much went into the groundwork [of the treaty], in persuading people to care about your cause and the networking in getting people together,” Raskob said.

Jamie Rowen, an assistant professor of legal studies at UMass, said that Moyes’s presentation was very “thought provoking,” and that it was very good for students to hear. Rowen also reflected on the effect of the nuclear prohibition treaty on the movement to remove nuclear weapons from our society.

“We should celebrate every achievement,” Rowen said, “but also maintain a self-perspective about what the effects of the treaty are.”

Kathrine Esten can be reached at kesten@umass.edu.

Comments
One Response to “Nobel Peace Prize recipient discusses nuclear weapons treaty”
  1. NITZAKHON says:

    In other words: “Let’s fundamentally alter human nature.”

    That usually doesn’t end well.

Leave A Comment