Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

Enjoyment for all

A man’s worth is not measured by his ability to resist his sexual urges.

So why should a woman’s be?

I’ve heard the term “slut” thrown around far too many times in this so-called progressive society. Only in a small handful of these cases has the recipient of the insult been male. When it was, it was usually prefaced by the word man, much like in the word “man-purse,” which is used because it implies that a purse is something feminine – just as the words “slut” seems to be. In none of these cases was the word used with the intention of seriously insulting the man or calling into question his morals or intelligence.

We are all sexual beings – both females and males alike. Neither likes pleasure more than the other as a general rule. So why do we react to sexually active females differently than sexually active males?

I’ve recognized this double standard since I knew what sex was. I’m sure everyone has heard it before, and I’m sure many are growing tired of it. But it hasn’t gone away, and it doesn’t look like it will any time soon.

The very fact that there are events in this country called purity balls, where teenage daughters make virginity pledges to their fathers and “promise to protect their mind, body and soul by remaining pure,” is an illustration of this very problem. There are apparently no male versions of these events.

I’m tired of hearing how progressive our society is. In what way is this progressive? Telling your daughter that all she has to offer is her virginity, so if she gets to the altar without it, her marriage will not be meaningful? Or that no man will want her if she’s already had sex – and well, that’s just the worst thing that could possibly happen to her.

First, let’s step away from the belief that men only want sex and women only want love and commitment. It’s ridiculous to imply that while women can and must control their sexual temptations, men’s libidos are out of their control. Furthermore, it is insulting to both sexes. Women and men are not wired differently when it comes to sex. This is made obvious through same-sex relationships. Does lesbianism only exist within relationships because women never want sex purely for pleasure? Clearly not. And how can homosexual men form loving relationships if sex is all that’s on their minds?

Sex does not cloud the mind of a healthy person and prevent that person from acting reasonably – whether they are of either sex. The act of consensual sex should be treated as what it is for both sexes: enjoyable and a natural part of life. We can’t go around berating one sex for enjoying it as much as the other. There’s nothing about consensual sex that is malicious or ill-intentioned, so why does it bring out these feelings toward the woman for observers?

These inequalities are deeply rooted in our history, and are far from absent in today’s world. They continue to be upheld by the use of the word “slut” and “whore” in degrading a female’s character. Imagine a world where women’s sexuality is as socially acceptable as men’s. Now imagine a world where men and women could do the exact same job and get the exact same salary. It’s the same world, but unfortunately, we haven’t made it there yet.

We can’t call our society progressive until we all have stopped using a woman’s decision to hookup with someone who she is not committed to as an indication of her character. If we are still calling her “stupid” and assuming that she was trying to find a relationship in a misguided way, or that she is unusual in her desire to have sex with no strings attached, yet we don’t attribute these qualities to men who do the same, we cannot claim that we consider both sexes equal.

There are certainly many people out there who respect a woman’s decision to have sex outside of marriage. We wouldn’t have shows like “Sex and the City” if this weren’t true. But if society as a whole was accepting of this, we also wouldn’t have outcry against the show for having its female characters sleep with various men throughout the series. There wouldn’t be an episode titled, “Are We Sluts?” I haven’t seen the all-male cast of “Entourage” asking themselves this question, and I’m sure if they were real people, the thought wouldn’t have crossed their minds either. Did it cross yours?

We still have a long way to go toward gender equality. We may be moving, but we’re moving slowly, and the more we cry out about the persistence of women engaging in casual hookup behavior, the more we’ll remain in place. That’s not progress.

Lauren Vincent is a Collegian columnist. She can be reached at [email protected].

View Comments (10)
More to Discover

Comments (10)

All Massachusetts Daily Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • P

    pattiApr 1, 2010 at 12:16 am

    To advocate of what?
    did you ever hear of typos ????? this is the internet! i don’t need to talk to my boss. You are talking about a survey! Don’t let the facts get in the way of a good story though !

    Reply
  • E

    EdMar 30, 2010 at 9:22 pm

    Actually, there is evidence (and it has been published and cited) that unmarried childless college-educated women under age 35 are earning MORE than unmarried childless college-educated men under 35.

    Women “earn less” for three very real reasons.

    First, the highest earnings are enjoyed by workers in their late 50’s and early ’60s. And women didn’t earn as much as men in the 1960s & 1970s and that is skewing the statistics now.

    Second, men work more hours a week than women. If you are working more hours, ought you not make more money as you are working more hours????

    Third, women of the same age have fewer years in the workforce and with the job. If a woman takes 2-3-4 years off to have kids, those are years where she isn’t doing/learning valuable work stuff and thus she doesn’t have the senority or skills that the guy has. And should get paid less as she hasn’t been there as long.

    It isn’t like anyone forced her to get pregnant….

    Reply
  • T

    The AdvocateMar 30, 2010 at 1:14 pm

    Patti,

    I am not calling women stupid, the US DOL took a survey and most women want things other then money as job priority. If you are being paid less then your male counterpart, go talk to your boss or the police if he refuses to pay you the same. I wasn’t saying women shouldn’t be paid less, just that it is different reasons then what the author was attributing it too.

    Also, grammar please!

    Reply
  • C

    ConesMar 30, 2010 at 8:40 am

    Because women have life *harboring* capabilities, any polyamorous behavior is seen to be both imprudent and disrespectful. Even if we think about the “period,” a relatively unique function of the human organism, we see that its purpose in nature, at least relative to the relationship, is to keep the man ignorant as to the specific time of a woman’s fertility, thus forcing him to stick around longer in order to fertilize the egg. Most other creatures make it very apparent when and when not it is time to reproduce.
    Seen in this light, the polyamorousness of females is in direct defiance to this life-harboring principle because though it is pleasing, a woman’s anatomy necessitates some sort of consistent sexual relationship.
    And plus, any guy who has ever had a one night stand knows that no matter how nonchalant the girl pretended to be before sex, afterward she is clingy- even if its just for the remainder of the night; most women choose their partners, even for one night stands, with some degree of judgement.
    I think in THEORY, a woman can defend her right to multiple partners, but in reality, it doesn’t work.

    Reply
  • E

    EdMar 29, 2010 at 10:33 pm

    “A man’s worth is not measured by his ability to resist his sexual urges.”

    Oh, really?

    Has the definition of ‘gentleman’ degraded so far that it is now socially acceptable for men to grope (or worse) sexually attractive women? I sorta hope not.

    And yes, a man’s worth IS measured by his ability to resist his sexual urges.

    Enough said?

    Reply
  • P

    pattiMar 29, 2010 at 4:38 pm

    meant to say they in above statement not that

    Reply
  • P

    pattiMar 29, 2010 at 4:36 pm

    hey advcoate
    where does the us labor judge values? they are into stats. i as a female nurse do not say hey pay me less than the male one! i do value money and want to be paid the same as man for the same job.
    you are basically calling women stupid. yes they do get paid the same for per hour jobs please that aren’t looked at the same
    in advancement/salary jobs. i think hookups are stupid for both
    sexes but it is true that the woman is regarded as a low moral
    person while the man might have a “sex addiction” or might be
    thought of as a “dog” but it is not the same thing.
    also rob good thoughts but i read his article and didn’t take it to be a joke either.

    Reply
  • Z

    Zach OelschlegelMar 29, 2010 at 11:19 am

    While I completely agree with Ms Vincent’s description of the double standard regarding promiscuous men and women, she falls short when using homosexual relationships as an example for how men and women are wired sexually.

    The evidence is very clear that men and women think quite differently when it comes to sex: the average homosexual man reports having more than one hundred sexual partners in his lifetime, while a lesbian reports about 12 sexual partners in hers. According to one study, over ten percent of male homosexuals reported having a thousand or more partners. If men and women were wired the same, we would see lesbians reporting similar numbers when it came to sexual partners.

    One could simply ask an older heterosexual couple about who has the larger sex drive for anecdotal evidence. But to claim that men and women act the same when it comes to sex is completely untrue, as Ms Vincent states in her article.

    Reply
  • T

    The AdvcoateMar 29, 2010 at 1:13 am

    http://www.swifteconomics.com/2009/09/21/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics-the-wage-gap/

    Women often do get the same salary as men when compared to the average in each sector/job market (IE marketing, bus driving, etc.), however average salaries overall for men is higher because men place money as more important then women, as discovered by the US Labor Department. Men and women hold different values, that’s all.

    As for women being sexually free, why not live and let live? We shouldn’t pressure men nor women into having sex just because they can though.

    Reply
  • R

    RobMar 29, 2010 at 1:09 am

    This is obviously a response to that incredibly controversial column last week, and a well written one thankfully. However, apparently the column was taken the wrong way by so many people simply wanting to cry sexist, and in some ways I feel that this is an example of it.

    It’s great that girls want to have as much fun as guys. Yes if a girl sleeps with a lot of men then some people may call her slut. But guess what? I know plenty of times that a girl will call a man a slut, or at least talk about him in the same way, if he’s slept with multiple women. Apparently that’s always ignored.

    Perry’s article was about girls complaining that hooking up with guys doesn’t lead to relationships. In Sex and the City, do the women talk with one another about why the guy they slept with doesn’t want to go on a date afterward? I’m not sure since I haven’t watched it, but I’m assuming it doesn’t. THAT’S what it was about, whether or not you see sexist undertones (that might exist, but were not the focus of the article).

    Honestly, it’s fine if people want to defend the progress that women have made in this society, but don’t be so quick to blindly do so.

    Reply