Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

Government cannot function at its best without civilized discussion

It was the shout heard ‘round the world.

Rep. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.) interrupted Pres. Obama during an address to a joint session of Congress in September, shouting, “You lie!”  Whether Obama was lying or not is a moot point. Interrupting a presidential address should not have been tolerated. The media jumped on this major faux pas, debating what punishment Wilson should receive, if any, and discussing the issue of respect.

At first, this seemed to be a one-off incident. Just one crazy senator who had had enough. Then Congress voted on the health care bill, and it happened again.

Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) first became a nationally known name in the fall, when he wrote an amendment to the health care bill restricting insurance agencies from funding abortions. After much cajoling from the Democratic Party, the bill reached the floor without Stupak’s amendment but with Stupak’s support. When Stupak cast his “Yea” vote, Rep. Randy Neugebauer (R-Texas) shouted “Baby killer!” Neugebauer has since claimed he was referring to the entire bill, but the timing of his outburst was surely not coincidental.

Neither of these men received a real punishment for their actions. However, our government is dependent upon the ability to have civilized discussion. There must be consequences if congressmen cannot abide by the rules of decorum.

These instances, however, are almost inconsequential compared to what happened after the health care bill passed in the House. Ten Democrats have received death threats after voting for the bill. Let me say that again: 10 Democrats have had their own lives and the lives of their families threatened because of their votes.

Rep. Russ Carnahan (D-Mo.) had a coffin placed in front of his home. Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.) first received a threat stating that snipers had been sent out to kill the children of those who voted for the bill and just this weekend had a brick thrown through the window of one of her district offices. And those are just two examples.

This behavior is completely unacceptable. This past week, the Democratic National Committee wrote a statement condemning these threats and “call[ing] on all Americans to respect differences of opinion, to refrain from inappropriate forms of intimidation, to reject violence and vandalism and to scale back rhetoric that might reasonably be misinterpreted by those prone to such behavior.”

They intended to issue it as a joint statement with the Republican National Committee. The RNC refused, saying that they felt the Democrats were trying to trap them – if the Republicans would not issue a joint statement, they were bad guys; if they did issue the statement, the Democrats would try to hold it against them later.

Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.), the minority whip in the House, has spoken to the press several times in the past week, asserting that the Democrats are publicizing the threats for political gain and attempting to ratchet up sympathy. He has pointed out that Republicans receive threats, too. One recent example is Rep. Jean Schmidt (R-Ohio), who received a phone message in which the caller states that he wishes she had broken her back in her recent car accident.

This is not a partisan issue. It is one that will affect all Americans if it is not dealt with soon. We cannot resort to violence and intimidation. What separates America from much of the world is that, when we don’t like the results of a vote, we still accept the outcome. We do not devolve into riot or stage a coup d’état. American democracy is based upon civilized discussion.

Politicians need to take some responsibility for this increase in threats and decline in civility. Wilson essentially received a slap on the wrist for his outburst, and Republicans argued that it wasn’t worth the House’s time to address it. Additionally, when Sarah Palin tweeted to followers “… Don’t Retreat, Instead – RELOAD,” regarding the health care bill, she was fanning the flames. As Rep. Steve Driehaus (D-Ohio) explains, “It doesn’t really matter the way you meant it, nor the way I accept it. It’s how the least sane person in my district accepts it.”  Politicians have great influence, which they must exercise with caution. Dangerous rhetoric has got to stop.

Now, this editorial is not to discount the value of protest. I heartily encourage you to take advantage of your First Amendment rights. However, there is a difference between protest and intimidation. By all means, gather your friends together and stand outside with signs. But if our lawmakers must fear for their lives every time they cast a vote, they cannot do their jobs effectively.

I also encourage you to call up your congressmen and -women. Write a letter. Organize a march. Donate to your favorite politician’s campaign or to a political action committee. But most importantly, you must register to vote. You must go to the polls on Nov. 2 and vote. 2010 is an election year in which 36 Senate seats and every seat in the House will be up for election.

We do not need to resort to threats to change the direction of the country. We already have great power as citizens. We have votes.

Emily Jacobs is a Collegian columnist. She can be reached at [email protected].

View Comments (6)
More to Discover

Comments (6)

All Massachusetts Daily Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • D

    DanApr 20, 2010 at 2:46 pm

    Alex, did you miss the part where Emily mentioned the threatening message delivered to Jean Schmidt (R-Ohio)?

  • E

    Emily JacobsApr 1, 2010 at 2:45 am

    Michael, I definitely agree that “You lie” and “Baby killer” are pretty tame compared to some things from the past. However, just because those insults are standard political fair doesn’t mean that they *should* be. But, like Lauren said, the main point of this is about intimidation and violence.

    Alex, Believe it. I spent quite a while looking for recent examples of liberal threats/violence and I couldn’t find anything not spun or taken out of context. That’s why I mentioned the phone call that Jean Schmidt (a Republican) received, saying that the caller wished she had broken her back -it was all I could find. If you can find an example of violence/intimidation that comes from a politician/constituent (not the media) that is recent and truthful, please let me know.

    The reason I put the line in there about it not being a partisan issue is that I had the same concern as you: this seemed one-sided and I wanted to be clear that I don’t think this is only wrong when the GOP does it (and I’m sorry that I apparently did not do a good job of this). If I had found an example of liberals perpetrating this sort of thing, I would have included it. I just couldn’t find it. Perhaps this is because Democrats have been bearing the brunt of the threats lately since many of them cast controversial votes for the health care bill. In any case, my message is meant for both parties: violence and intimidation are not acceptable, no matter who they come from.

  • C

    CheMar 31, 2010 at 10:28 pm

    well at least if anyone gets hurt, they have health coverage now.
    (yes, i know politicians already had health plans, this is sarcasm)

  • A

    Alex PerryMar 31, 2010 at 4:53 pm

    My only question is why you stuck a one liner in there suggesting this is not a partisan issue when all you did throughout the column was call out people associated with the Republican Party.

    Were you really just unable to find an example of Liberals trying to intimidate opposing views from having civilized discussion?

    Impossible to believe.

  • L

    LaurenMar 31, 2010 at 4:11 pm

    awesome article, Emily!
    and yes Michael politics can be ridiculous but throwing rocks through people’s windows and sending death threats is not just “dirty politics”. stuff like this may have been going on here and there before, but the tea party and others (democrats AND republicans) have taken it to a whole new level lately and there is no way you can find this acceptable. if everyone wasn’t so severely partisan these days maybe we could all come to a consensus that violence and threats are wrong, but apparently that’s not even possible.

  • M

    Michael Foley-RöhmMar 30, 2010 at 10:58 pm

    Politics is always dirty and ridiculous. That’s how it is, and should be, because what are men and women who want to control what everyone else does if not maturity-challenged adults who are still stuck in the toddler stage of ME ME ME?

    “You lie” and “baby killer” are pretty tame compared to both American history itself and the actions of governments abroad, with people getting into fist-fights and all.