Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

Tiger’s prowl

I have spent my entire life rooting against Tiger Woods on the golf course. I really couldn’t stand Tiger. I hate how he beats my favorite players every time. I hate how he ruined David Duval’s career simply by showing up. I hate how he can shank a drive onto a fairway bunker on a different hole, and then have his next shot stick within 10 feet of the pin on a par-4. I hate how when I mock him for exaggerating an injury, it turns out that he just won the U.S. Open on a broken leg.

Tiger Woods is the greatest golfer to ever live, and I couldn’t stand it. I would never root for him. He isn’t human. But that all changed on Thanksgiving this past year.

When I was with my family on Thanksgiving and I saw that Tiger Woods got into a car accident, I immediately had two reactions. Is Tiger alright? Is Tiger going to be able to play golf again?

When it comes to Tiger Woods news – for anyone outside his family and friends – all that should matter is that he is healthy and winning matches. If either of those are affected, I will show some interest; otherwise, I really don’t care, and I don’t think any of us should.

As it turns out, Tiger Woods is indeed healthy – at least physically – and the accident should not at all impact his physical ability to swing a golf club.

So why is Tiger in the news every day? Why do I have to hear about him hooking up with girls like this is some sort of unbelievable and unprecedented event? I can see how it’s terrible that he’s supposed to be a role model and is showing poor morals by treating sex casually – especially when he is married. Honestly, it’s shameful. But what do I care? I assume that almost all pro athletes are engaging in this kind of behavior whether they are married or not. Really, there is no reason to think they aren’t all doing this. Look at the best player in every sport. Kobe Bryant is married and has been caught with other women. Tom Brady knocked up a woman outside of marriage. Alex Rodriguez couldn’t resist Madonna and others while married. It’s ridiculous.

But it is difficult to blame them because they are rich and athletic guys traveling across the country, with women constantly throwing themselves at them. They can whomever they want, whenever they want them. You don’t even have to look further than the University of Massachusetts to see how some girls throw themselves at athletes – and the athletes at our school aren’t even rich or famous. The temptation is constantly there for all pro athletes to indulge themselves with women, and many of them do. This isn’t big news.

In some of Tiger’s cases it’s funny news, but it’s not big news.

Yet the media turned Tiger Woods into the villain. They made it seem like he was the only rich and famous athlete hooking up with lots of girls. How could a role model do this? As if all the young men in the world who look up to him are going to hold this against him. As if any guy over the age of 16 doesn’t know how the game works. Sorry to break this news to all of you people living under rocks, but if you’re a pro athlete, one of the privileges you get is access to lots of money and women.

People look up to Tiger and want to be Tiger because he is the most dominant athlete in the world, and want the privileges that come with the territory. Tiger’s behavior will not change any of this. The man is a billionaire. He is still the best golfer to ever live. He is by far the highest paid athlete annually. Maybe he lost his marriage, but he should have never been married in the first place. At this point in his life, it is safe to say he isn’t mature enough to handle the responsibilities that accompany being a loving husband and a good father. He is lying if he said he loved his wife, because if he did, he wouldn’t have felt compelled to sleep with so many women.

This all being said, I think the fact that the media turned on Tiger should make us want to root for him. I have never rooted for him before, but I know I want to now. I hope he kills the Masters this week from the first time he enters the tee box to his final putt on Sunday. I hope people boo him when he has his name called at the first tee, and he smacks it 320 yards right down the heart of the fairway. I hope we see vintage Tiger Woods this week. I hope Tiger gets into the final pairing with some European stiff like Sergio Garcia on Sunday and embarrasses him on national TV. And when he does, Tiger can flip the bird to the media as Cabrera puts the green jacket on him.

If Tiger pulls all that off, he will truly be newsworthy again.

Alex Perry is a Collegian columnist. He can be reached at [email protected].

View Comments (11)
More to Discover

Comments (11)

All Massachusetts Daily Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • C

    Chris AmorosiApr 7, 2010 at 9:26 am

    “when did i ever write about a woman having casual sex? i talked about a culture in general. i didn’t single out any individuals. an individual having casual sex is not news worthy and neither is tiger woods doing the same.

    tiger woods has been called out individually by the media despite his actions being commonplace in his profession.”

    You made my nose bleed again.

    You can’t say that men created a casual sex culture in general, then blame women for falling prey to the alleged culture, and then two weeks later say we should ignore it when men in the sports culture not only behave in a similar fashion but commit reprehensible acts like cheating on one’s wife.

    Well obviously you can say all those things because you did. But you shouldn’t do that. It’s called a “double standard.”

    Your entire argument in “Bad romance” hinged on the idea that it’s bad for “casual hookups” to be “mainstream” ie popular, n’est-ce pas? In this column, you say we should accept hook-ups when it happens in male-dominated sports for the exact same reason that made hook ups so offensive two weeks ago: popularity. Now do you understand?

    You’ll probably come back and say something like “well the double standard is just fact of reality.” So was male-only suffrage, criminalized interracial marriages, lynching blacks…

    “you taking personal attacks at a person you apparently creep on facebook and have never met in person doesn’t make your terrible columns read any better or make me look bad-”

    Creep? I didn’t secretly “friend” you to access this extra-personal information. Everything I saw was freely and publicly available and perfectly relevant when discussing a self-appointed expert on sexual mores and relationships like yourself. If you don’t want details of your life discussed, don’t put them in the public domain.

    “they simply make you look like a moron with no life or friends.”

    Nah. Maybe I come off as an ass, but certainly none of those things you said. I’m obviously not a moron because I can spot a double standard. And I obviously have a life because I know more about women than you. How? By having female friends. Complaining about women having casual sex two weeks ago then turning around to defend a guy who had casual and also extramarital sex would imply those things you listed but only about yourself.

    Also saying stuff like:

    “Get your act together, or you girls will continue to stare at that “single” status on Facebook.”

    Only invites ridicule when you yourself are also listed as “single” and obviously don’t understand women too well.

    Or in terms you can understand, you started it!

    Chris Amorosi
    Former Collegian Columnist

    PS: Not bothering to capitalize letters properly and ending sentences with hyphens (???) makes you look lazy and inexplicable.

    Reply
  • A

    Alex PerryApr 6, 2010 at 9:52 pm

    chris-

    when did i ever write about a woman having casual sex? i talked about a culture in general. i didn’t single out any individuals. an individual having casual sex is not news worthy and neither is tiger woods doing the same.

    tiger woods has been called out individually by the media despite his actions being commonplace in his profession.

    for that reason i feel he has been wrongly vilified.

    you taking personal attacks at a person you apparently creep on facebook and have never met in person doesn’t make your terrible columns read any better or make me look bad-

    they simply make you look like a moron with no life or friends.

    Reply
  • R

    robApr 6, 2010 at 6:38 pm

    hes talking about having a child out of wedlock with bridget moynihan….hence, “outside of marriage”, not while he was married, just out of wedlock, before his marriage.

    Reply
  • J

    Joe McGrathApr 6, 2010 at 5:28 pm

    Nh (knock knock)

    Reply
  • A

    Alex PerryApr 6, 2010 at 10:46 am

    Hillary- great comments. “I love how you assume all pro athletes are male” … when I say “pro athlete” I’m referring to the 4 pro sports people care about in north america. MLB, NFL, NBA, NHL. That’s all that matters at the pro level. College football and college basketball are all that matter at the collegiate level. Women play some of these sports but nobody really cares or watches them. That’s just fact of reality.

    The other point you made that I assume all pro athletes are heterosexual is I guess valid, I did make a broad statement but I think if I had some data it would indicate the vast majority of these athletes are indeed heterosexual. The ones that are not are not open about it publically. I can’t name 1 gay player in any of the 4 leagues I mentioned.

    You should root for Tiger because he was unfairly singled out by the media and they have casted him as a villian when really he’s just a bad husband. It has nothing to do with me or you.

    Stop reading between the lines and trying to spin my words against me. There is nothing to spin.

    Reply
  • C

    Chris AmorosiApr 5, 2010 at 9:41 pm

    “The temptation is constantly there for all pro athletes to indulge themselves with women, and many of them do. This isn’t big news.”

    Buh- but I thought it’s news-worthy (or at least column-worthy) when average college women have casual sex, Alex! What a twit.

    “I can see how it’s terrible that he’s supposed to be a role model and is showing poor morals by treating sex casually – especially when he is married. Honestly, it’s shameful. But what do I care?”

    According to you two (2) short weeks ago:

    “But somewhere along the line during the past 20 years, men were apparently successful in creating a culture where the norm became hooking up with someone for a period of time and then, if you like the hookups, consider dating.”

    So obviously you do care because you see these culture-shaping men as having created a huge moral panic. At least you did two short weeks ago. You really need to get that lead paint out of your bedroom, Alex. And maybe the asbestos, too.

    Yet again, we see Alex bend over to hypocrisy just to idolize men who promote extramarital sex, cf. “Bad romance” and his Facebook links to Newt Gingrich and Sean Hannity. Hilary handled the sexism aspect (Hi Hilary!), but I think this emerging infidelity trend deserves some attention. Why is Alex so fixated on the ability of powerful, influential men getting laid? Projection? Golf-themed, innuendo-laden masturbation fantasy? His Facebook still lists him as single so he doesn’t have much to do on a Saturday night except put around his “back nine.” If you know what I mean. I mean centimeters.

    At least this makes me feel better for turning in crap columns sometimes. I don’t think any of my logic aneurysms shot brain matter out my nose like this column made me do.

    Chris Amorosi
    Former Collegian columnist

    Reply
  • F

    FrankApr 5, 2010 at 8:30 pm

    Jess-You don’t know what your talking about.

    Go Saux

    Reply
  • J

    JessicaApr 5, 2010 at 7:10 pm

    Matt- He said Tom Brady had a baby out of wedlock (referring to his baby with Bridget Moynahan). Just an example of how pro athletes treat sex causally. Great reading skills!

    Reply
  • M

    MattApr 5, 2010 at 6:10 pm

    Tom Brady was never married before Giselle genius. Great research!

    Reply
  • H

    hilaryApr 5, 2010 at 5:26 pm

    “The temptation is constantly there for all pro athletes to indulge themselves with women, and many of them do. This isn’t big news.”

    I love how you assume that “all” pro athletes are male and/or heterosexual. Also, while this isn’t ‘big news,’ why should I support a guy who just perpetuates stereotypes about male athletes, and about male sexuality in general? I think he’s an embarassment, and I don’t quite see/ understand your rationale for supporting him only after his infidelities are exposed, but not before.

    Reply
  • M

    Michael Foley-RöhmApr 5, 2010 at 1:36 pm

    I’m getting scared. I agree with Alex Perry once again.

    Reply