Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

Organic foods benefit health, but at a cost

MCT
MCT

Going organic is said to be both commendable and healthy. But is spending an additional $20 at Big Y worth it? Possibly, but it is important to know the difference between organic and conventional food preparation prior to making a decision.

 

According to MayoClinic.com, the style of organic farming refers to the lack of unnatural additives involved in the growing process.
“Organic farming practices are designed to encourage soil and water conservation and reduce pollution,” said the site of its benefits.
The trend seems to be sweeping the nation, one grocery store or restaurant at a time.

Amy Spindler of CookingLight.com shared in her article, “Organic vs. conventional: What do experts say?” that “the organic market is growing at a steady pace of nearly 20 percent annually, and that translates into organic alternatives in nearly every grocery aisle – from snack foods to frozen meals to baked goods,” According to Spindler.

Aside from the organic market expanding in grocery stores, it is also ambushing local restaurants. Various eateries in the Amherst area pride themselves on buying only locally grown foods.

The Black Sheep, in Amherst, offers handmade breads, desserts, pastries, locally- bought milk and organic fair-trade coffee. Tabellas Restaurant in Amherst is advertised as “farm to table dining.” According to the eatery, 80 percent of their selections are locally and organically grown.

A common misconception is that all foods served organically are mainly vegetarian or vegan. This is certainly not the case, as Local Burger in Northampton proves.

This self-proclaimed “good fast food” joint offers “fresh, delicious, and well-priced food, while supporting the community through the use of local produce, products and services,” according to their website. The burger shop serves veggie, turkey and portabella burgers in addition to the classic red meat option, all organic.

But what will this do for prices? From Local Burger, the Grass Fed burger is $6.59, whereas a smaller burger from McDonald’s fits on the Dollar Menu. Local Burger’s menu lists that their seven-dollar burger is from Chicoine Farm in Easthampton. McDonald’s offers no place of origin, leaving customers to guess.

It’s not just restaurant prices that are escalated from the organic boom. Supermarkets also feel the wrath, according to the Chicago Tribune.

In the article titled “Organic vs. Non-Organic,” the Tribune explains that “higher prices are due to more expensive farming practices, tighter government regulations and lower crop yields.” Apparently the organic sticker isn’t just slapped on any food item. As the Tribune continued, “Organic farmers use methods to control weeds and pests that are labor intensive and more expensive than herbicides or pesticides, and that can drive up cost.”

As for the health differences between going organic and consuming conventional methods, MayoClinic.com sums it up. Conventional farmers use chemical fertilizers to increase plant growth to its full potential, while organic farmers stick with manure or compost to help flourish vegetation. In conventional farming, insecticides and pesticides are sprayed on crops to keep disease at bay.
Organic farmers “use beneficial insects and birds, mating disruption or traps to reduce pests and disease,” said the site. Conventional farmers also use herbicides to kill weeds, while organic farmers practice crop rotation or manual weed removal. MayoClinic.com also covers one of the scarier aspects of conventional farming; animals are fed growth hormones and other medications to increase food production and ward off diseases. Organic farmers simply give animals organic feed and let them roam outside, meanwhile carefully cleaning equipment and surroundings to fight disease.

The choice seems simple: Support factory farming while ingesting potentially harmful chemicals for lower prices, or go organic and support local farmers who avoid dangerous additives for a bit more money. Going green may take a bit extra green out of your wallet, but it could lead to a healthier lifestyle.

Kate Evans can be reached at [email protected].

View Comments (3)
More to Discover

Comments (3)

All Massachusetts Daily Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • K

    Kate EvansApr 27, 2011 at 12:30 pm

    Jeremy, you are partially right about the first part. Although some organic farmers opt not to use pesticides, some do use “bio-pesticides.” These are a bit less harmful as they are composed of some plant products as opposed to a non-organic pesticide. Thanks for your comment; I should have specified.

    Reply
  • R

    RobertApr 27, 2011 at 11:33 am

    Organic labeling in and of itself is a misconception that leads people to believe it is better, healthier and more environmentally friendly than foods produced in a more conventional manner. Just because a farm (or food) is labeled as organic does not make it better than a conventional producer, or more specifically someone who is an amalgamation of the two. For example, which do you believe is more environmentally friendly: organically produced vegetables from Chile that are flown and trucked thousands of miles using fossil fuels to be brought to your local supermarket, or the farmer who is right next door that uses mostly organic methods, but cannot be labeled organic because the manure he uses comes from cattle that aren’t organic? The food solution is not Organic, it is LOCAL. Local food is good food all around, so support your local farmer even if they are not “organic”. On a side note to respond to Jeremy, I raise grass fed beef on my farm, and yes it does take longer to raise the animals, but not as long as you think, its an average of 6 months longer. My cattle receive very little grain when they are young, to help build a strong foundation, and then nothing but grass from my farm after 1 year of age. They keep the land clear and growing grass, sequestering CO2. This is in contrast to cattle that are sent to feed lots for the last three months or more of their life where they are force fed corn and other grains on a concrete slab, where everything is trucked in and out. The almost complete lack of fossil fuels used in a grass fed system far outweighs the slight increase in production time that is observed.

    Reply
  • J

    JeremyApr 27, 2011 at 12:05 am

    One of the biggest misconceptions regarding organic agriculture is that they do not use fertilizers or pesticides….they do, just in a different form. Also, animals brought to market with organic practices actually are less “green” because they have a larger impact on the environment due to the fact it takes the animals much much longer to reach their potential.

    Reply