Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

Estrogen pollution making ripples

Just when you thought that pollution couldn’t get any worse, it gets stranger.

Girls are experiencing puberty at unnatural ages, women are having trouble bearing children and research has shown an increase in the percentage of females among newborn children. Scientists are saying that these things are due to an unsafe amount of the hormone estrogen in our water.

Products like birth control are rapidly gaining popularity in our country. Hormones are put into these medications in order to control the reproductive system, and in this case the hormone is estrogen. Estrogen is also used, although less popularly, to help women in pregnancy, relieve menstrual pain and increase hormone production. Seeing as estrogen is so widely used and even considered necessary for the health of some people, it is difficult for doctors to stop people from using it.

With all its capabilities, how could estrogen possibly be harmful to humans? The answer lies in what happens after estrogen-based products are consumed. Estrogen does not get broken down by the human digestive system. It comes out of our bodies with waste and flows relatively chemically untouched into our water supply.

People often don’t see the danger in this. After all, we have water treatment plants for the very reason of cleaning out such pollutants. However, water treatment plants do not treat for chemicals such as estrogen. The devices needed to do so are not required by the government and are extremely expensive. In addition, the amounts of estrogen in the water are considered to be negligent according to government standards and this too pushes the topic away from the public eye.

Although the government chooses to ignore the small amounts of estrogen in the water, scientists are quite concerned. Just like how skin slowly burns in the sun, exposure to estrogen for long periods of time will eventually harm your body. Our bodies produce and use estrogen, but adding more estrogen affects the natural balance of our hormones. Scientists have conducted experiments that involve exposing estrogen to fish populations and observing what occurs. As they observed the generations, they discovered that the males of the species became increasingly feminized, which led to delayed sperm production. Eventually, this became unsustainable and the fish were unable to procreate effectively. This is a scary realization that we need to get to work on removing this pollutant.

But who is truly to blame for estrogen pollution? Deeper analysis will reveal that the responsibility lies with multiple parties. The people are creating the problem with their use of estrogen-based products, but the government isn’t doing its job to remove these pollutants. It is a joint effort, but there isn’t way to fairly force either side to do what needs to be done.

The government budget plans need to be edited to allow plants to do the necessary work. This is a matter of public health and safety and proper funds need to be supplied. However, the government is struggling with its finances and other national issues and most likely wants to focus on more immediate problems. Also, water treatment plants have to work the best they can to eliminate these problems. They can accomplish this by making the problems known to the government and provide statistical data to encourage government intervention. Workers may not want to put in extra effort for less pay, but in a cooperative cleanup effort everyone must sacrifice.

On the other hand, people too need to be aware of the dangers they create by disposing of various materials in water. First of all, we must look at the necessity of these estrogen-based products. If there is no way to avoid using them, we must find effective alternatives or safer replacements. We have to be careful with our own habits to preserve our health.

With no clear answer in sight, we have to look for the best option. Ultimately, the responsibility falls on the people. Since the government is a large and complex organization, we can’t expect it to suddenly fund water treatment plants or initiate programs to make the water cleaner. However, there are things that we as citizens can do to make a difference. Instead of flushing old birth control pills down the toilet, we can dispose of them properly. Many cities have organized events in which medications can be dropped off and disposed of in an environmentally safe manner.

On a more personal level, before using estrogen-based products, people could decide if it is worth the risk of polluting the water. Aside from pollution, people can focus on water purification. Although water treatment plants won’t purify the water completely, there are products available to buy and use at home. These products probably won’t be perfectly effective, but the extra purification helps. So when the authorities fail, the responsibility falls upon the people to keep their world safe and clean. Hopefully, someday we can truly collaborate, people and government, to defeat pollution problems such as estrogen contamination.

Until then, we as individuals must do what we can to keep ourselves safe.

Luke Dery is a Collegian columnist. He can be reached at [email protected].


View Comments (4)
More to Discover

Comments (4)

All Massachusetts Daily Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • D

    dmtafejrSep 27, 2012 at 1:29 pm

    Don’t be discouraged by the ad hominem attack. This Heather suggests that flushing synthetic hormones down the toilet is what? A good thing? She is, rather transparently, more concerned with the availability of birth control as a “women’s health” issue– which is in itself fine, even commendable. However, to belittle a journalist for raising awareness is foolish and, as i say, a transparent agenda-driven attack. If I were she, I would be more concerned about appearing as a pharma-fanboy/girl than attacking people who, rather innocuously, raise concerns about synthetic hormones. Perhaps if you added images from “Batman” and “Bring it On” you would better please your critic– because that is, I suppose, her idea of “hard-hitting” journalism. 😉

  • L

    LukeSep 21, 2012 at 12:10 am


    I visited your blog and I find it rather interesting. To clear things up, I was not citing the pill as the only source of estrogen pollution. I do recognize the fact that it comes from natural sources, and that many other pharmaceuticals contribute to the chemical pollution of water. I was just highlighting birth control as one cause of the pollution that many people can relate to in their daily life. Anyway, thank you for taking the time to read my work.’

  • H

    Heather ParkerSep 20, 2012 at 2:41 pm

    Seriously? You call yourself a journalist?

    Here’s a post on why claims that oral contraceptives containing estrogens are pollutants is bunk:

  • S

    Swole DudeSep 20, 2012 at 1:09 pm

    I’ll continue to piss pure testosterone in the water to balance the estrogen levels… You’re welcome society.