Massachusetts Daily Collegian

Letter: Join the movement against student debt

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






(Jessica Picard/ Daily Collegian)

Ask anyone on campus if they enjoy watching the digits of their own personal student debt-counter increase, and you will probably receive a resounding no. Ask anyone if they believe burdening a student with thousands of dollars of debt while receiving a quality education is a good idea and you will likely receive the same answer.

Every year, the state government in Boston approves an annual budget which includes state appropriations for public higher education institutions. Currently, 22 percent of the University of Massachusetts’ revenue come from state appropriations. Thus, it can be assumed that a decrease in state funding would lead to an increase in tuition fees to make up for the cuts—that is the exact problem we students in Massachusetts face today. But, if the state were to increase funding to lift the weight of student debt off our shoulders, we would all be in a much better financial situation then we are currently in.

Since 2001, higher education funding and spending per student by the State Scholarship Program has fallen by 31 percent. The fall in per-student spending amounts to a decrease of around $4,000 per in-state student. Meanwhile, tuition and fees for in-state students have jumped by $5,400. Compared to other states in the country, Massachusetts ranks 21st in higher education spending per student, adjusted to the cost of living.

Furthermore, student debt is financially detrimental to students individually and to the economy. For each dollar of student debt, there is an associated four dollars of wealth loss. Because students accumulate so much debt while they are enrolled in a university, by the time they graduate they are discouraged to take on other forms of debt such as mortgages and auto loans. This can lead to shrinkages in consumer spending, property values and tax revenues.

However, what’s great about UMass being a public school is that it does not have to be like this. The state can increase funding for public universities to end tuition fees. All it takes is a few keystrokes.

Alas, anyone familiar with state politics knows that we cannot just expect politicians to do this on their own. What we need is a movement – a state-wide movement to put students first and demand that the state government must end tuition fees for institutions of public higher education. The good news is that there already is one! The Center for Education and Policy Advocacy (CEPA) on campus is building a mass mobilization campaign to fight for affordable higher education. Over the coming weeks, CEPA will be hosting several events from documentary screenings to student forums to spread awareness about the current student debt crisis. Next month, students here and from across the state will be convening at the statehouse for a massive rally to push tuition-free higher education to the forefront of the state’s political agenda.

Now is the perfect time for action. Now is the perfect time to put students first. Now is the perfect time to be part of this campaign.

CEPA meets every Tuesday from 6 to 8 p.m. in room 423A of the Student Union.

Jonathan Blum

UMass CEPA Affordable Higher Education Campaign

4 Comments

4 Responses to “Letter: Join the movement against student debt”

  1. FD2003 on October 17th, 2017 9:47 am

    Whaahhhh!! Whaaaaahhh!! I want a Ferrari education but don’t want to pay for it!

    No one “burdened” anyone else with college debt. You did this to yourself. State schools everywhere provide fantastic educations and trust me, in the Real World, no one looks at the name of the University for entry immediate post-graduate jobs.

    Until you can describe the caliber of the gun that was at your forehead when you signed your promise to pay back the other people’s money you BORROWED.

    If you want student loan relief, I want mortgage relief. Ask anyone if they believe burdening a person with thousands of dollars of debt just to get a decent home to live in is a good idea and you will likely receive a positive response.

    [Reply]

  2. SittingBull on October 17th, 2017 10:49 am

    Nothing “free” is ever really, is it? Where do you think those tens of millions of dollars will come from? State budgets are far too stretched with welfare payments and subsidies of all kinds, not to mention woefully underfunded public pensions and infrastructure. And the expectation of a totally free education is, well, un-American. The state of the university system in America over the past 40 years is basically a sanctioned racketeering operation. But people are wising up and the technology revolution is devaluing the college chokehold in many ways. You SHOULD expect to pay for an education providing you with skills to become part of the economy. Of course, it shouldn’t cost the soul-crushing debt that currently comes with it. Which means universities of all stripes have to pare the indulgences that make these places mini-utopias. First, professor pay probably needs to be slashed by at least 1/3. These positions are artificially valued far too highly in the marketplace due to the flush cash that universities have from raping students on fees and tuition. Another side benefit would be to flush away many of the ideologues posing as educators. At schools like UMass where no one gives a damn about athletics, most or all of the intercollegiate sports should be abolished, as they are a massive drain on funds. These two reforms alone will free up millions and millions of dollars that could be passed directly back to the consumer in the way of more reasonable tuition and fees. The way it used to be.

    [Reply]

  3. Ed Cutting, Ed D on October 17th, 2017 3:43 pm

    It is a spending problem — look at all the 6-figure salaries and expensive new buildings.

    That’s your problem!
    That’s why UMass is so expensive…..

    [Reply]

  4. Nitzakhon on October 20th, 2017 8:54 am

    What is a working definition of slavery? IMHO:

    “The co-opting of the output of another’s labor by force, whether implicit or explicit, for one’s own benefit.”

    Therefore, the writer of this piece is pro-slavery.

    [Reply]

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Right
Navigate Left
  • Letter: Join the movement against student debt

    Archives

    UMass walks off vs. La Salle Friday

  • Letter: Join the movement against student debt

    Archives

    司法部反托拉斯法调查涉及安城学院

  • Letter: Join the movement against student debt

    Archives

    El arte de vestirse como un papá, o sea, el “papatuendo”

  • Letter: Join the movement against student debt

    Archives

    GEO holds sit-in at Chancellor’s office for negotiation of graduate student worker contract

  • Letter: Join the movement against student debt

    Archives

    UMass softball run-rules Hartford, 8-0

  • Letter: Join the movement against student debt

    Archives

    MASSPIRG holds panel discussing college affordability

  • Letter: Join the movement against student debt

    Archives

    College of Social and Behavioral Sciences holds panel discussion on the spread of disinformation

  • Letter: Join the movement against student debt

    Archives

    Defense and team effort key for UMass women’s lacrosse against Richmond

  • Letter: Join the movement against student debt

    Archives

    UMass softball falls flat in loss to Boston College

  • Letter: Join the movement against student debt

    Archives

    Another road trip for UMass women’s lacrosse has team staying loose