Scrolling Headlines:

Pipkins’ double-double leads UMass men’s basketball over Western Carolina -

November 21, 2017

Luwane Pipkins leads the UMass men’s basketball shooting show in 101-76 win over Niagara -

November 19, 2017

UMass to face tough test with Niagara backcourt -

November 19, 2017

Hockey Notebook: John Leonard on an early season tear for UMass hockey -

November 18, 2017

Clock runs out on UMass men’s soccer’s dream season in NCAA opener -

November 17, 2017

2017 Basketball Special Issue -

November 16, 2017

UMass men’s basketball prepares for transitional season in 2017-18 -

November 16, 2017

Author Viet Thanh Nguyen discusses how history and humanity is remembered -

November 16, 2017

CMASS completes seven-week discussion series -

November 16, 2017

UMass women’s basketball resets and reloads, looking to improve on last year’s record with plenty of new talent -

November 16, 2017

Matt McCall’s winding path to bring unity to UMass -

November 16, 2017

Carl Pierre is a piece to Matt McCall’s basketball program -

November 16, 2017

Why they stayed: Malik Hines, Chris Baldwin and C.J. Anderson -

November 16, 2017

McConnell chooses politics over morals -

November 16, 2017

Swipe right for love? Probably not. -

November 16, 2017

‘The Florida Project’ is a monument to the other side of paradise -

November 16, 2017

‘Thor: Ragnarok’ doesn’t have to be the best Marvel movie -

November 16, 2017

Thursday’s NCAA tournament rematch between UMass men’s soccer and Colgate will be a battle of adjustments -

November 15, 2017

Veteran belonging and the decline of American communities discussed by journalist and author at Amherst College -

November 15, 2017

‘UMass Cares About Cancer’ Hosts Blanket Making Event -

November 15, 2017

Trump voters were motivated by racism, not economic anxiety

(Olivier Douliery/Abaca Press/TNS)

Last week, when White House Chief of Staff John Kelly claimed that the Civil War resulted from “a lack of ability to compromise,” he engaged in one of America’s most cherished pastimes: whitewashing history to coincide with a narrative that both sides of a particular conflict had worthy arguments, and the real tragedy was their inability to come to a mutual understanding. Indeed, if not for his history of commanding Department of Homeland Security officials to generalize immigrant populations as criminal, and his ill-considered feud with African-American Congresswoman Frederica Wilson, General Kelly’s behavior could be viewed as largely a product of the education he received growing up. Until the 1970s, U.S. history textbooks across the country routinely referred to the Civil War as the “War Between the States” and depicted secession and Reconstruction as equally egregious mistakes.

While it’s now easy to recognize the folly in portraying both sides of the Civil War as noble and just, we have continued to advance narratives that favor American mythology over uncomfortable truth—none more pervasive than the dogma that voters who supported President Trump did so because of “economic anxiety.” The theory goes that Trump was the only politician to speak to the working class’s financial fears, exacerbated by the daunting forces of globalization, immigration and mechanization. This ignores Trump’s overt sexist and racist appeals during the campaign and repackages them as legitimate economic grievances. In this world, it wasn’t Trump’s conflation of Mexican immigrants with rapists that motivated his supporters; it was his criticism of the North American Free Trade Agreement and the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

This has been generally accepted by vast swaths of the media and political landscapes, with the “New York Times”’ Nicholas Kristoff and the “New Yorker”’s George Packer, as well as liberal Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren and former Vice President Joe Biden coalescing around a similar argument that Trump voters’ motivations were primarily economic in nature. Biden has repeatedly rejected that prejudice was a primary motivating factor for Trump voters, pleading that “they aren’t prejudiced, they’re realistic” and that “they’re not racist. They’re not sexist. But we didn’t talk to them.”

But this is a bunch of malarkey.

Post-election surveys and exit polls tell a much different story of the voting habits of the working class. For instance, it is not well-known that the typical Trump supporter was actually much better off financially than the average American. The median household income of a Trump voter during the primary was $72,000—considerably higher than the median American household income of $56,000, and roughly $11,000 more than the median family income for Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton supporters. This trend repeated in the general election, when Trump won more of the voters making $50,000 to $250,000 or higher in a year than Clinton did, and Clinton won more of the voters earning less than $50,000 than Trump did. A Public Religion Research Institute study found that white working class voters in the worst financial shape were actually 1.7 times more likely to support Clinton than Trump, virtually disproving the myth of economic anxiety and suggesting that Trump supporters were more likely to be suburban investment bankers than rural coal miners.

So, what compelled voters to support Trump if not for financial reasons? In a post-election study, University of Massachusetts political science professors Brian Schaffner, Matthew MacWilliams and Tatishe Nteta found that voters who denied the presence of racism in the United States were more likely to vote for Trump than those who acknowledged its presence by a 60 point margin, and those who expressed sexist views were more likely to vote for Trump than those who did not by a 20 point margin. All in all, the authors remarked that economic variables “were dwarfed by the relationship between hostile sexism and denial of racism and voting for Trump.” In a similar vein, political scientist Philip Klinkner found that the most predictive question to determine if a white person supported Trump in the primary was not their pessimism on the economy or free trade deals, or even their partisan identification, but if they thought President Barack Obama was a Muslim—a unique falsehood levied against the first Black president and used as political fodder by Trump. Racial animus was the single most potent factor in the 2016 election.

There is an inherent danger in telling one dominant story to communicate the intentions of millions of people. Of course not all Trump supporters are racist or sexist—many even have legitimate economic concerns. But to suggest that these factors played no part in Trump’s ascendance is not only willfully ignorant; it’s disingenuous. The stories we tell about ourselves have meaning. They help to communicate our history and intentions, and most importantly, how we perceive ourselves. It is up to us, then, to tell them honestly and in good faith, and not cast aside difficult conversations for convenient lies.

 

Matt O’Malley is a Collegian contributor and can be reached at momalley@umass.edu.

Comments
8 Responses to “Trump voters were motivated by racism, not economic anxiety”
  1. NITZAKHON says:

    You want more Trump? This is how you get more Trump.

    Racist? Seriously? I would have thought a college student could have come up with something better, what with all that education and stuff. I guess it’s true: can’t make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear.

  2. AndyW says:

    This article is full of uneducated opinion. the author appears to have started with a pre-determined narrative and then sought enough other opinions to find a thin thread calling it proof. You might actually spend some time with those who voted and find out why they made the decision they did. You would find in fact a lot of it had to do with economic concerns. When we look at Bernie Sanders and Hillary the topic of conversation was to raise taxes and spend it on socialized medicine, schooling, housing, etc. etc, etc. These costs came on the back of those of us who fall in the middle making just enough that we must pay the full cost of our kids schooling but not enough to actually feel like we are ahead of the world. Articles like this have quickened the divide in the country because you lay claims of racism in a place where it really does not exist. This is not to say that there are not people who fit your model but that does not define the norm just like calling on Bernie supporters communist does not define the norm.

  3. dumb guy says:

    I’m currently asking my black brother-in-law why he was so racist when he voted for Trump.

  4. bobloblaw says:

    Racism, which is why so many Obama counties from 2008 and 2012 went Trump in 2016

  5. Iain Macallester says:

    People go to college to acquire knowledge and critical thinking skills.

    Matt still has a way to go.

  6. Patrick1123 says:

    Matt’s research and analysis is thought provoking and his conclusion is well-reasoned. It appears his commentary has touched some raw nerves. Time for some self-reflection, folks.

  7. NITZAKHON says:

    Once again I see my comments are being censored. Let me repeat:

    So the author thinks that Trump supporters are racists?

    I’m white. I’m Jewish. My father’s side of the family has been here since, quite literally, the Pilgrims. I’m married to a first-generation, non-white Muslim. So I challenge the author to sit down with my wife to liberal-splain how I’m a bigot.

    Hope you have good health insurance; she’ll rip the author a new one.

  8. Patrick1123 says:

    Nitzakhon, you are a right wing blogger and a troll. Your description of yourself is dubious. Your hatred does not allow you to even understand the point of the author’s OPINION piece. No one can reason with someone like you.
    Threatening violence is typical right wing bigotry. You sound like someone living in his mother’s basement. Grow up.

Leave A Comment