Massachusetts Daily Collegian

‘What the Health:’ a persuasive yet dishonest argument for veganism

Dissecting vegan fact from fiction

Katherine+Mayo%2FCollegian
Katherine Mayo/Collegian

Katherine Mayo/Collegian

Katherine Mayo/Collegian

By Chandley McKenzie, Collegian Staff

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






If you’ve seen “What the Health,” you know it delivers some shocking information about eating animal products. It aims to persuade its audience to switch to a plant-based diet, warning of increased risk of disease, even on the average American’s meat consumption. Kip Andersen, co-director and co-writer, also attempts to uncover deception in the health and pharmaceutical industries. While a vegan diet is certainly a healthy option and some information from the documentary is factual, many doctors, critics and experts in the health field have criticized “What the Healthfor cherry-picking information and misinterpreting existing data to support the creators’ claims.

Because cancer and heart disease are the leading causes of death in the United States and diabetes is more prevalent than ever, Andersen wanted to explain how this is related to meat and other animal products. Primarily, the documentary explains that processed meat is linked to these diseases. It claims sugar is used to dissuade the public from worrying about meat and diabetes is caused by the buildup of fat in the blood from animal products instead. The documentary proceeds to find several statistics supporting these claims.

The viewer must be mindful of the purpose of this documentary and take all the information with a grain of salt. While the documentary claims sugar is not a major health threat, several studies have found links between sugar and diabetes and heart disease. A recent study published in JAMA Internal Medicine found the sugar industry funded research that whitewashed the dangers of sugar and accentuated the threat of fat.

The documentary also claims that eating processed meat is the equivalent of smoking cigarettes. The International Agency for Research on Cancer declared processed meat a carcinogen, a cancer-causing substance, however this does not mean that it is as threatening to the body as cigarettes. “What the Healthhighlights studies that prove milk’s link to cancer, ignoring the majority of studies that have found no strong correlation. The assertion that an egg a day equals five cigarettes a day has also been disproved by health professionals such as Stacey Mattinson.

Of these experts, many are disheartened by the lack of honesty and evidence from the presented information. “There is a growing movement to create a more honest and evidence-based approach to vegan nutrition,” said Virginia Messina, a vegan health professional. “We need the non-vegan world to know that it is possible to stand in support of animal rights while embracing scientific integrity.”

Another large part of the documentary features Andersen confronting large health organizations. After researching recommended recipes on the American Diabetes Association’s website, Andersen discoveres a bacon wrapped shrimp dish and various others featuring processed meat. After more research, he discoveres that many of these large organizations are corporate partners with animal product companies. For example, the American Diabetes Association partnered with Dannon and the American Cancer Association partnered with Tyson. This is perhaps the most alarming part of the documentary. If the previous claims about processed meat and animal products are true, these large organizations that are meant to be fighting prominent and threatening diseases are ignoring statistics and taking money from these companies for profit.

When Andersen arrives at the American Diabetes Association’s headquarters with various studies in hand, prepared for conversation, he does not get very far before he is asked to leave. Messina argues that she understands the American Diabetes Association’s unwillingness to discuss the topic, saying that many professionals do not have time to waste on individuals who do not understand the complexity of the research behind the subject. Andersen was shut down over the phone by the American Cancer Association, and his interview was cancelled when they found out that he wished to discuss the link between cancer and diet.

Since the effects of processed meats and dairy on the body are still being researched, no definite conclusion can be made on the integrity of nation’s largest health organizations. The bottom line is that “What the Health,” like every documentary, is a persuasive essay in video form. Directors Andersen and Keegan Kuhn clearly wanted the audience to walk away shocked, disgusted and ready to make a change. In the end, it’s up to the viewer to discern the information for his or her self and to decide if switching to the plant-based diet is really as critical as “What the Health” claims.

Chandley McKenzie can be reached at [email protected]

1 Comment

One Response to “‘What the Health:’ a persuasive yet dishonest argument for veganism”

  1. David Ulrich on September 6th, 2018 9:40 pm

    Ever since this Documentary came out the meat and dairy industry have been trying to discredit it. Such as the claim of cherry picking which for them means that there is a rigged industry funded study which shows something different, so to them it must be cherry picking to cite the real science. This of course is nonsense, just being a ruse the industry uses to keep the general public confused.

    Take type 2 diabetes for example, the fact that this disease is caused by a fat buildup in the cells is beyond debate. Scientists know the mechanics of this disease and there is no serious science which claims otherwise. High blood sugar is a symptom of this disease not a cause. peer reviewed studies have shown conclusively that when diabetes sufferers change to a low fat plant based diet most are able to get off or significantly reduce their medication within just a few days of healthy eating. While it is true that you can reduce symptoms of diabetes by limiting sugar intake you are not doing anything to cure the disease, which is exactly what your doctor (if he hasn’t been deceived as well) and the pharmaceutical industry want. If they tell you how to cure the disease you will most likely do that and go back to your life. If on the other hand they tell you how to manage the symptoms of the disease, they have you as a customer for life, even if it is a shortened miserable life for you, they still have your money.

    The Author states that there is debate about whether or not Milk from a Cow is carcinogenic when consumed by humans. Milk contains IGF1 or Inslin like Growth Factor One. This compound is known to cause cancer in humans. There is no debate about this. If there are in fact studies which call into question this fact I would seriously question the ethics of those studies.

    There are many ways to get the results you want when designing a study. Take that egg study that the industry was raving about a few years ago. The conclusion was that eating eggs did not significantly raise cholesterol levels. Would it change your opinion if you knew that all the participants were overweight people with high cholesterol and that when the human body is at saturation for cholesterol it doesn’t easily absorb more. As a result when eggs are added to a already unhealthy cholesterol laden diet, the total cholesterol doesn’t change much. The authors and funders of this study knew what the results were going to be before they started and they only reason that a study like that would be commissioned is again to deceive the public into eating unhealthy food.

    The author also states that processed meats are still being researched. While that may be true, the results of existing scientific study is conclusive. There is no debate, outside of industry funded studies like the one I laid out above. Processed meat is a classified as a class 1 carcinogen by the World Health Organization, one of the most prestigious scientific research organizations in the world . Class 1 is the most toxic classification there is. Plutonium is also a Class 1 carcinogen and you can’t get much more carcinogenic than that.

    Every day articles are published in peer reviewed scientific journals showing that consuming animal foods, whether is is body parts or excretions, is unhealthy and causes disease. and there are also studies published by industry which are designed to throw the legitimate studies into question. The big difference between these two kinds of studies, is that industry funded studies have a marketing budget and real science does not. Keep that in mind the next time someone tells you that saturated fat and cholesterol are health foods.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Right
Navigate Left
  • ‘What the Health:’  a persuasive yet dishonest argument for veganism

    Archives

    Minutemen return home after three-game road stint

  • ‘What the Health:’  a persuasive yet dishonest argument for veganism

    Archives

    Mangia, e ti sentirai meglio.

  • ‘What the Health:’  a persuasive yet dishonest argument for veganism

    Archives

    Student coalition works to ‘get out the vote’ before November election

  • ‘What the Health:’  a persuasive yet dishonest argument for veganism

    Archives

    MassPIRG announces five campaigns for the 2018-2019 year

  • ‘What the Health:’  a persuasive yet dishonest argument for veganism

    Archives

    UMass men’s and women’s cross country travel to Boston

  • ‘What the Health:’  a persuasive yet dishonest argument for veganism

    Archives

    UMass field hockey takes on two conference opponents this weekend

  • ‘What the Health:’  a persuasive yet dishonest argument for veganism

    Archives

    UMass needs to cultivate class awareness through economic diversity

  • ‘What the Health:’  a persuasive yet dishonest argument for veganism

    Archives

    The president of the United States has too much power

  • ‘What the Health:’  a persuasive yet dishonest argument for veganism

    Archives

    Wonder Woman vs. Captain Marvel: the latest Marvel/DC feud

  • ‘What the Health:’  a persuasive yet dishonest argument for veganism

    Archives

    ‘The Nun’ is a terrifyingly bad movie