Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A Tangible Legacy

Matthew Harrison/Collegian

Today is the last day to claim our autonomy and decide on a future that will leave a lasting legacy here at the University of Massachusetts. Besides voting for next Student Government Association President, Vice President, and Student Trustee this week, we are voting on a referendum to build a new Student Union. “This is the spark,” said Secretary of Finance and senior Ben Johnson, “a really big spark to make [this] initiative possible.”

This spark has been a long time coming. The last major renovations on the current Student Union were made in 1957 when the student population was less than five thousand. “[Past SGA administrations] were trying for years to get a new building,” said Johnson, but what makes this referendum stand out is the long term planning and recognition that this project would be something that we students need to play a major role in.

The referendum does not only ask for students to vote on getting a new student union – almost everyone, including the UMass administration, recognizes that we need a new building. The problem comes down to how to pay for this project, an estimated $100 million. Massachusetts State allocates money primarily to academic-only buildings, so all other projects need to find funding from elsewhere. As tough as a financial state we are in, building a student union will require the help of the people it is intended to serve. The costs of putting off this project will be far greater: UMass has offered to meet us halfway to pay for the new student union if we vote yes on the referendum.

To finance the project, Johnson created a 25-year payment plan for the students. Raising the $50 million will place a $125 fee per semester on the student body. After twenty-five years an estimated 500,000 students will pass through this university helping to cover half of the building costs with the other $50 million coming from the university. The proposed construction includes completely renovating the current space and expanding over the open area towards the campus center. As Johnson puts it: “this year is the first time that a plan is comprehensive and recognizes that students have to contribute.”

The Recreation Center is a prime example of what students can do for future UMass generations. About 10 years ago, students wanted a new recreation center that was high quality and available to the community. In order to accomplish this, they understood that students needed to pay for something they needed and wanted. Those students who paid the first fees for a new rec center never had the opportunity to use it. But we do. “It was a student-paid initiative; students in the past paid it for us,” said Johnson.

Right now we have a student union in dire need of repairs and hardly a place for all student groups to congregate. Lack of space for RSOs is nothing new. According to Johnson, barely 15 percent of all RSOs have offices in the student union. On top of that, Facility Services owns the building, so students have to pay a fee to use space in our union. A new building would change all that: there will be larger conference areas, spaces for student businesses, breakout rooms, and more. It will be our space, our union. If our school is to continue growing, as it most surely will, we need a union for the 21st century to show it. We cannot afford to wait another ten years or major building damage to force the university into action.

The next two months are my last ones here. I never had the opportunity to be active in a student union that was responsive to my needs a student and the needs of our community. Not even this fall’s incoming class will be able to experience the full benefits of new student union if we vote yes on this referendum. That is not the point though. By voting yes, we are leaving behind a legacy of student action, organizing, and most importantly in these days, our autonomy. Day in and day out, decisions about us are made behind closed doors and without any student involvement. This culture of indifference does not go away over night. It takes time to change a culture, but we have to start somewhere.

Today is the last day to vote yes to buy a new student union. Taking part in a new vision for the future of UMass students is the greatest contribution we can give to this community. When a new state-of-the-art union is finally completed, we will be able to say that we continued the legacy of student activism and initiative 150 years after the founding of our university.

Roy Ribitzky is a Collegian columnist. He can be reached at [email protected].

 

View Comments (6)
More to Discover

Comments (6)

All Massachusetts Daily Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • R

    Resident IIApr 9, 2012 at 4:46 am

    Student advocacy is code words for do-nothing. CEPA budgets could be cut to help fund, plus all the redundant social justice organizations.

    Reply
  • R

    ResidentMar 15, 2012 at 5:00 pm

    Roy, seriously? I thought you were all about advocating for students, not for pushing a new bills onto their shoulders. We should be fighting for the state to fund these buildings, not for students who are already burdened with debt to have to foot the bill.

    Reply
  • R

    RyanMar 15, 2012 at 2:36 pm

    To respond to Alison, it is a bit ridiculous that we do have a lot of older and decrepit buildings on campus. However, with the building of new facilities such as ISB and its extension, we finally can renovate tired and overused buildings. ISB and its extension are primarily chemistry and physics facilities, historically located in Goessman and Hasbrouck. Now that these facilities have been built, or once they are, the old facilities /are/ being renovated. Goessman is currently going through an extensive lab renovation. Once the ISB extension is completed, facilities such as Hasbrouck can then be renovated without interrupting the research that brings so much money to this campus.
    Lastly, as was stated in the article, the reason we need to pay for this is that unfortunately, money for renovations and new buildings doesn’t go to student buildings.
    What I am concerned about is that there does not seem to be plans to create a new building, meaning that there will probably be a massive shuffle through the building as they rebuild the building in segments, putting places such as Union Video Center, People’s Market and other places with very specialized facilities at a disadvantage as their space is re-configured over, I would assume, a considerably long period of time.

    Reply
  • A

    AlisonMar 15, 2012 at 10:52 am

    Does anyone else find it ridiculous that there are buildings on campus that are literally condemned, falling down, windows boarded up, and yet we are building a second brand new science building and now want to funnel $100 million into a new student union? I don’t see anything wrong with our current student union. That enormous amount of money should be used to RENOVATE the places on campus that desperately need it, like Bartlett and Hills. With $100 million we could put renovations on all three buildings. You say that we have to start somewhere in leaving a legacy…I think that having huge gorgeous new buildings will never be able to cover up the decrepit buildings being ignored all over campus.

    Reply
  • S

    SGAMar 15, 2012 at 9:35 am

    You can vote online:

    http://umassamherst.collegiatelink.net/

    Elections end tonight!

    Reply
  • A

    AnitaMar 15, 2012 at 9:08 am

    Where do we vote?

    Reply