Alright, now before everyone goes squawking away about all the benefits of the Obama high-speed dream rail system allow me to anticipate the arguments in favor of the proposed rail and proceed to slam each one to the dirt with my obnoxious witticisms.
Proponents say, it’ll pour money into the economy. I say, it sure as hell better with the amount of scrilla it’s proposing to drain from it. Last I checked our economy has been drained plenty over the past few years having been sucked dry from our friendly neighborhood too-big-to-fail corporations.
Others point to all the theoretical environmental benefits of the proposed high-speed rail system.
Listen hippies, I don’t know what you’ve heard, but no one – not even good ‘ol Amtrak Joe Biden – is saying this high-speed rail system is going to be running on some kind of magical earth-friendly biofuel. Furthermore, let’s all take a moment to fathom the enormous carbon footprint 20-plus years of high-speed rail construction is going to leave on our already fragile environment. Moment taken? Good.
But Isaac, China has one.
China has one? Is that supposed to be some kind of selling point? China has a Great Wall; maybe we should get one of those. And while we’re at it, America, maybe we should start capping the amount of kids we let our citizens have, because hey, China does that too. It seems to me that we as a country need to do some national soul searching and come to terms with our weird infatuation with China. It’s like we’re a bunch of competitive private school girls. We are not in competition with China. That place is a bubble ready to burst. Just wait until that one-child policy comes back to bite the Chinese national behind. You’ll have a population of sexually frustrated men, no children, no future and a sweet high-speed rail system. I’m over it.
Finally America, let’s be honest, the last thing we need is more high-speed things. The world we live in – 3G networks, Internet access in our pockets – is high speed enough. We’re going to high-speed ourselves into oblivion. Obama proposing we pour billions of taxpayer dollars into a high-speed rail system is like trying to get rid of a population of squirrels by opening a squirm farm. America has enough squirrels, which is to say, we have enough high-speed stuff.
What we as a country really need is a way to slow things down. We’re wired in 24/7, checking Facebook walls, watching our favorite pundits jabber on a mile-a-minute, drinking so much caffeine we practically cry tears of pure Monster Energy Drink; we seldom take time out of our lives to take in the beauty and joys of simple existence. A high-speed rail system will get us places faster.
But so what? Is life about making sure we get places really fast? The beauty of rail travel has always been that it gives you time to sit, to wonder, to read a book.
Now if Obama feels we’ve got billions to spend and manpower ready to work, I propose this: bike paths. First, start building them in our cities: Los Angeles, New York, Chicago and Boston. And then once that’s sorted out we move onto phase two: trans-continental bike paths. All our cities should be linked up through well-paved well-kept bike paths. This would provide plenty of jobs seeing as it takes a lot of man (and woman) power to build bike paths, and nothing is more environmentally friendly then riding a bike. Furthermore, high-speed rail doesn’t eliminate car travel. Once you get off the train you still need to take a car to wherever it is your going. Riding a bike, you don’t have this problem. You can ride your bike right to your intended destination.
In conjunction with the trans-continental bike paths, the Obama administration should dive full-force into a national campaign informing citizens of the tried and true health benefits of biking because along with our country’s economic problems (which history has shown, we can overcome) we have an alarming and rapidly increasing obesity problem. High-speed rail does nothing to address the fact that while America is getting faster she’s also getting a whole lot fatter. In fact, the proposed high-speed rail system would merely enable the average American’s sedentary existence. Trans-continental bike paths would help our economy while at the same time encouraging a fit and active lifestyle where people can enjoy the fresh air of the great American outdoors at any pace they please.
Isaac Himmelman is a Collegian columnist. He can be reached at [email protected].
BY • Mar 4, 2011 at 7:50 am
The issue isn’t a choice between bikes and trains. They both have their places. Bikes are great for recreation and short commutes. Trains, especially high speed trains, are excellent for longer trips, by individuals and when transporting cargo. In the long run a network of high speed trains is more cost effective than a network of highways.
Michael • Feb 28, 2011 at 12:54 pm
As an able bodied person in their mid-twenties, I like the larger idea of the rail way in combination with the bike path, but what does this mean for the handicapped or the elders working till their 77? How would they fit into this grand plan?
Tyson • Feb 13, 2011 at 2:26 pm
Anyone who doesn’t get that this dude is being funny is an idiot. Isaac, good work brotha!
Peter • Feb 11, 2011 at 10:28 am
Dimwit? This guy is brilliant. You need to think this
over, get in shape, and get ready for your 400
mile ride… to the squirrel farm!
Josh • Feb 11, 2011 at 10:13 am
I, a college frat boy, agree wholeheartedly with smith. I hope this article was meant to be funny rather than actually persuade people with a meaningful argument. I hope that I will get to help work on this project!
Robert Kastigar • Feb 11, 2011 at 10:08 am
Many years ago there was a rail line between Milwaukee and Madison in Wisconsin – to carry traffic between the big city and the capital.
It went out of business and was abandoned for lack of use.
Today it’s a very nice bicycle path, the Glacial-Drumlin Trail that runs almost the full distance between the two cities.
Save money – build a bike trail directly instead of a rail line first and then tearing it out to make a trail.
Frank • Feb 11, 2011 at 9:35 am
Dear smith, obviously you’re the dimwit. Yes, even though this article seems to suggest that you should bike 400 miles to travel this weekend, the larger point he’s trying to make is that we should slow down and try other options before we build an expensive rail system. And by the way, can frat boys even write?
Dear isaac, not as good as your articles about eminem and facebook, but still witty! Your sense of humor shines through, I especially liked the “cry tears of pure Monster Energy Drink” haha good work, keep it up! I like that you’re writing for UMass from Ireland =]
Flower • Feb 11, 2011 at 1:57 am
funny
smith • Feb 10, 2011 at 11:52 pm
Is the author a dimwit idiot?! Yeah, I’m gonna BIKE 400 miles to travel this weekend!
Ever been to Europe? I put my bike on the frikkin train.
Get out of college, and learn to write sensible articles, not frat boy opinion pieces!
James • Feb 10, 2011 at 10:13 pm
Hi Speed rail systems can also transport cargo shipments that bicycles cannot. You can also take you bicycle on the train. I like the idea of a major system of local, regional, and trans-continental, bike paths; especially to and from all public transportation centers. A 250 mph train ride can link bicyclists to places to which they would otherwise almost never have time to ride.