Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A sheep in wolf’s clothing

It was not a safe place for a college student from Massachusetts, an Obama-voting, Earthfoods-frequenting liberal, to suddenly find myself surrounded by the reddest of the red, the pure-blood conservatives who, after all the years of escalating budgets, the never-ending Iraq war, Hurricane Katrina, the bathroom stall foot-tapping, and the Bush backlash, still identify as conservatives. Who were these 10,000 people? The miniature flag-waving, three-piece-suit-wearing bodies came together for the same reasons they convene every year – Underneath the hanging crystal chandeliers and emblazoned NRA signs hanging in the Wardman Park Marriott in Washington, D.C., conservatives hope that after all their recent struggles they can find what it takes to get America back from what only a year ago had appeared to be an insurmountable public referendum.

So here conservatives gathered from 50 states to hold conferences, exposing “The Hoax of Global Warming” and to “Save Freedom from College Campuses,” all in hopes that someone or something would emerge from the seemingly leaderless throng. That any of the gathered speakers over the course of these three days – from Massachusetts veterans Mitt Romney and Scott Brown to those with moderate appeal like Ron Paul and Allen West – would, through their rhetoric, unite the scattered herds of the party and lead “A Conservative Comeback in 2010.”

But why was I there? Well, I’d like to think that it’s because democracy is a conversation. It takes two equally engaged parties. Sure, I’m on the executive board of the UMass Democrats, but as a newly inspired Democrat waiting for all this hope and change stuff to pass through a Congress that’s about as clogged as a rush hour thru-way, I figured I’d hop over the aisle and see what the other side had to say.

And they had a lot to say, as this year’s Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) burned with a fire as if the future of America was at stake last weekend. An annual event since 1973 – not openly affiliated with the Republican Party but visited by every major Republican from Karl Rove to Ronald Reagan – preach to its flock. The overarching theme of the conference, “Saving Freedom,” was underlying the rhetoric of most of the conference’s speakers. The Republican Party has been accused of being bankrupt of ideas, and more unfavorably as being, “the party of No.”

In short, the Republican Party has an identity problem, one that was addressed head-on and most passionately by keynote speaker, Glenn Beck. He reckoned the Republican Party with images of his own life filled with addiction and eventual recovery, and more aptly with Tiger Wood’s recent apology to the American public.

“The first step to getting redemption is you’ve got to admit you’ve got a problem,” Beck said. He was railing against the crowd with a piece of chalk gripped in hand, his face flushing, his words serving to stop in their tracks those who wanted only to clap at something optimistic.

“I have not heard people in the Republican Party admit that they have a problem,” Beck continued. “And when they do say they have a problem, I don’t know if I believe them. I don’t know what they even stand for anymore.”

What does a post-Bush Republican stand for? If you’re Rep. Mike Pence (R-Indiana) it means you still want to go back and retroactively “deny Planned Parenthood funding.” That in order to best deal with our biggest economic alley and bottomless pocketbook, China, America “needs to have one-hand extended in diplomacy, and the other on the holster of the arsenal of Democracy.” If you’re Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minnesota) you blame the “media and elites for bailout nation” and “turning a manageable recession into a 10-year depression,” while you equate America with a story of brave soldiers on a sinking ship, ones who “chose greatness rather than American decline.” If you’re Newt Gingrich, the architect of the 1994 Republican takeover of Congress, you walk to Survivor’s “Eye of the Tiger” and shake hands with the crowd before championing this nay-saying sentiment, “the best way to defeat [health care] is to slow the debate down” to a chorus of applause. Then you thank President Obama. You thank him for the “coming massive conservative majority” that without him “would not have been possible.”

Well, there I was in the midst of this throng that was about as diverse as a bag of green M&Ms, tagging along with Brad DeFlumeri, one of the most hated ideologues that the UMass campus has yet produced and the one-time leader of the UMass Republican Club when it was our most outspoken and controversial student organization. During his tenure as the club’s president, it was one of the most infamous campus groups, going to war with the Radical Student Union and even the Collegian by printing his own monthly “newspaper,” the now-defunct “Minuteman.”

However, according to DeFlumeri as we lounged about a hotel room in Bethesda, Md., even he “hasn’t identified as a Republican for the last 13 months.” So what does the modern-day conservative stand for?

In order to figure that out, CPAC turned to its annual straw poll, the barometer by which those who identify with this ideology gauge their beliefs and values. Every year before the keynote speaker, CPAC founder David Keene, and for the last seven years its leading pollster Tony Fabrizio, have announced the results of the CPAC straw poll. With more than 2,300 voters, 64 percent of which were male and 54 percent of which constituted young Americans ages “18-25,” the poll served to give conservatives something to chew on before midterm elections. It attempted to give an idea of where the party’s constituents stand on issues that could serve to coalesce the party in hopes of reaching that great majority.

So what did they learn? Well, some things were more obvious than insightful. Of the gathered conservatives who voted, 98 percent “disapprove of Obama’s presidency.” However, the poll did show significant fluctuation on many issues. 80 percent listed “individual freedom and size of government” as the most important goal for the party, while in contrast only nine percent voted for “advancing pro-life agendas.” Similarly, 52 percent voted that the size of government was the most important issue facing the party, while only one percent voted that it was gay marriage.

One issue came to a head when Ryan Sorba, the head of the California Young Americans for Freedom, took the stage with his peers and used the platform to blast CPAC for inviting GoProud, a pro-gay Republican group. As he was booed off-stage he mocked the crowd, shouting, “the lesbians at Smith College protest better than you,” twice, for the extra emphasis. He was referring to protests against his speech promoting his book, “The Born Gay Hoax” at Smith.

While one would likely think that with all the pragmatic refrains for fiscal responsibility, Mitt Romney repeated as the 2010 straw poll winner for the most likely political candidate in 2012, holding on to his 2009 crown. However, despite dealing with a medium level of boos and deviating substantially from the party line, omitting mentions of Reagan and Obama from his speech, Ron Paul rose from a 13 percent third-place finish last year to first place, taking 31 percent of the vote.

Until then, however, the Republicans have some work to do figuring out which platform will be best to win back the hearts and minds of the American people. Some ways that they plan to do this are by learning from their mistakes. At the “Television Training Workshop,” which asked its audience to talk about how the American public views conservatives, more than a few uttered the word “un-cool.”

The rest of the talk focused on future politicians studying the way television can be used to sway voters, with more than a few references to the last champion of conservatism, Ronald Reagan.

There were other small signs the Republican Party is becoming susceptible to new ideas., a new social networking site for conservative students, was tabling the conference. The new service offers those on campuses a chance to voice their ideas to a large audience, promoting discussion of conservative ideas.

Yet another independent lobbying group, Citizens Opposing Prohibition, was successful at drawing people from all walks of life to talk about our nation’s drug policy. No doubt spurred on by its spokesman, the 10-gallon hat wearing Howard “Cowboy” Wooldridge, a retired police detective who lobbies on behalf of legalizing all sorts of drugs from marijuana to heroin.

There was still an overwhelming feeling of a railroad car that was about to come unhinged that just couldn’t be shook. For every “Cowboy” Wooldridge that championed new ideas and different approaches, there were the tea partiers harkening back to patriotism’s revolutionary roots.

It seems that even though the GOP recently has been handed the blueprints for the Republicans of tomorrow in the form of Scott Brown, the schism of the party is only widening. And if the GOP wants any shot at 2010, they need to figure out how to bridge the gap between the fiscally friendly moderates and the growing radical right. Let’s just hope that this is one time the Republican Party doesn’t produce a “bridge to nowhere.”

The great conversation that is democracy depends on it.

Pete Rizzo is a Collegian columnist. He can be reached at [email protected].

View Comments (9)
More to Discover

Comments (9)

All Massachusetts Daily Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • R

    rules online datingSep 12, 2011 at 12:13 pm

    you have a great page here, lots of good stuff.

  • M

    muad'dibMar 2, 2010 at 12:10 pm

    Matt… thanks. Thanks for calling it like you see it.

    First they came for the liberals…

  • E

    EdMar 1, 2010 at 1:57 pm

    > As Ed says, people waited for five hours -likely discussing
    > the relative merits of domestic terrorism in the meantime-

    No, they were cheering NAS’ Steve Balch and FIRE’s Alan Kors — both men roundly condemning the plague of political correctness and mind control that is on America’s campii today. I encourage all to see

    > to see the American incarnation of Joseph Goebbels

    ENOUGH! European History 101: “NAZI” stood for (in German, of course) “National Socialist” which was socialist, collective, left of center. It differed only from Communism in how it organized things, both were collective systems with little distinction of a difference. Nor were there really many differences between Hitler and Stalin – both were butchers, both killed Jews with particular relish, both evil LEFTIST COLLECTIVIST dictators.

    Gobbells was the propagandist for a SOCIALIST dictatorship. Conservative thought is best represented by Locke’s defense of INDIVIDUAL rights to “Life, Liberty & Property.” It is the other end of the spectrim, trash it if you like but trash it correctly!

    > spout off about the rise of the jew,

    The thing about conservatives is that we are all fanatically individualistic, to the point where we can legitimately be criticized for being selfishly so. As Ann Coulter said, we don’t even agree on who our leaders are — I would extend it to the point that we don’t even agree that leaders are needed. The conservative movement is organized chaos – the people running a NASPA or ACPA convention could never have dealt with the challenges presented at CPAC…

    So when you have this level of individuality, it is impossible to paint broad strokes as to the collective group, all I can say is to individuals whom I personally know. Several of the speakers were Jewish, I only know that because I know them personally and when you get a Ḥănukkāh card from someone, you kinda presume that. I know one organization there that is predominantly Jewish, but I only know that because they have invited me to their events. Taught me some nice Yiddish words that I am told I shouldn’t use…

    Remember that conservatives treat people as individuals.

    Remember that Hitler was a Progressive, not a Populist…

  • M

    MattMar 1, 2010 at 11:10 am

    I find these comments hard to take seriously. CPAC deserves nothing short of scorn, and that Pete gave the folks who gather there even a modicum of respect is an impressive feat.

    As Ed says, people waited for five hours -likely discussing the relative merits of domestic terrorism in the meantime- to see the American incarnation of Joseph Goebbels spout off about the rise of the jew, err, liberal elite class and how its bringing down the country.

  • B

    BenMar 1, 2010 at 9:21 am

    Peter, your snarky sarcastic tone and frequent use of liberal buzzwords (cliches?) makes this article difficult to take seriously.

    Oh, and by the way–Ryan Sorba is awesome.

  • E

    EdMar 1, 2010 at 5:23 am

    > 2,300 voters, 64 percent of which were male and 54 percent of
    > which constituted young Americans ages 18-25

    In other words, 2,300 self-selected members of a 10,000 population, with 54% in the 18-25 age group, when the population was over 60% in that age group.

    In other words, about a fifth of the people who pushed their way through the mayhem to fill out the straw poll. Are we surprised that those with strong coalitions present – Ron Paul & Mitt Romney – did well?

  • E

    EdMar 1, 2010 at 5:04 am

    Here is Glen Beck’s speech. It is an hour long.

    People had been sitting in there for FIVE HOURS in order to see it.
    Three overflow rooms, almost as large, were over capacity as well.
    The lobbies were overcapacity as well.

    This wasn’t like the mASSgop or a mASSgop event….

    Also see the speech on political correctness and campus reform:

  • E

    EdMar 1, 2010 at 4:58 am

    > One issue came to a head when Ryan Sorba, the head of the
    > California Young Americans for Freedom, took the stage with
    > his peers and used the platform to blast CPAC for inviting
    > GoProud, a pro-gay Republican group.

    If you were SOBER at CPAC, and I was, you would have seen a greater diversity of opinion there than you ever would here at Planet UMass. If you went downstairs through “Libertarian Row” and actually listened to what people had to say, you would have heard some really interesting and diverse things…

    Of course, I understand that “the guys drank a lot in the motel room…”

    > Ron Paul rose from a 13 percent third-place finish last year
    > to first place, taking 31 percent of the vote.

    I got to see Ron Paul speak. The word “senile” came to mind.
    There is nothing like really seeing these people….

    > there were the tea partiers harkening back to patriotism’s
    > revolutionary roots and championing Andrew Stack III
    > flying planes into IRS buildings.

    I don’t know what CPAC you were at, but the one I attended had live CNN and FOX News monitors throughout the lobby. And I saw universal disgust toward this homicide bomber. The place was packed – 10,000 people at a place that usually hosts conferences less than half that size – and it wasn’t all that apparently immediately what had happened, but I saw universal disgust from young and old. The people at the CPAC conference I attended simply did not champion this sort of thing…

    Of course, I went down on the train, stayed in the city, and actually ATTENDED the conference. Met lots of nice people down there as well, it is amazing how many radar screens UMass is on.

    And one other thing: there are 5,100 students in Southwest. There were over 6,000 students at CPAC. I don’t think we are going to have any “bridges to nowhere” soon….

    • M

      MultimediaMar 1, 2010 at 11:27 am

      *Editor’s note: The line referring to Andrew Stack was removed from the print version, and the online version has now been changed to reflect this.