Massachusetts Daily Collegian

My reservations about Bernie

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






Jessica Picard/Daily Collegian

(Jessica Picard/Daily Collegian)

Around 300 people rallied at the Student Union on Tuesday to show their support for Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders. University of Massachusetts students and professors, as well as members of the Amherst community, came together with the intention of building a united progressive movement, glorifying Sanders’ platform. The renowned socialist has been making waves with his progressive appeal and platform calling for free higher education, an end to income equality, a livable wage, tax reform, investment in the middle class, accessible healthcare, climate change and so forth, but hasn’t been held accountable for one of his shortcomings: foreign policy.

Many liberals have convinced themselves that they “Feel the Bern,” but have done so passively, and without questioning Sanders “about what he would do as commander in chief of the world’s leading military power.” It is the election season that allows the American public to demand more from candidates, rather than settling for the lesser of two evils.

Bernie Sanders believes that war should be the last option, but has rejected Clinton’s plea for a no fly zone in Syria and endorsed the Obama administration’s year-long crusade to bomb the country.                “The United States has been bombing targets in Syria, including the Islamic State and al-Qaida affiliate Jabhat al-Nusra, since September 2014. Those strikes have reportedly killed at least 240 civilians,” according to teleSUR. The common rhetoric of keeping America safe shouldn’t justify the lost lives of 240 Syrians and suggesting a no fly zone to “make a very complex situation in Syria even worse” seems counterintuitive.

Sanders believes we must seek diplomatic solutions before resorting to military action, but this last August said he wouldn’t end drone strikes in areas like Yemen, Somalia and the Pakistani borderlands. Since Obama took office, at least 314 civilians in these countries have been killed and Sanders argues that drone strikes should be used “selectively and effectively.” With his stance on Syria and potentially continuing the drone program, Sanders can no longer hide behind his 2002 congressional vote against the invasion of Iraq. Sanders says, “While we must be relentless in combating terrorists who would do us harm, we cannot and should not be policeman of the world,” but the amount of civilian casualties has me questioning who the terrorists are.

The senator from Vermont proved he is progressive with his support of the Iran nuclear deal. His endorsement of the deal is significant because his ability to drive the Democratic Party farther to the left is juxtaposed with the task of convincing liberals that accordance results in peace. Sanders believes the deal is “making certain that Iran does not acquire a nuclear weapon – an occurrence which would destabilize the region, lead to a nuclear arms race in the area and would endanger the existence of Israel.”

His approval of the deal is consistent with how the majority of the American public feels about Iran: a state of sponsored terrorism in desperate need of control. Lifting the sanctions on Iran is momentous for Iranians and their economy, but not a reason for his support. The United States’ jurisdiction has left Iranians in economic turmoil and if Sanders is fighting for the working family, what about mine? The United States’ relationship with Iran is clouded with contempt and collocated with a Pro-Israel alliance, without considering the US’s crimes against the region.

Regarding the Israeli occupation of Palestine, Sanders believes “the U.S. must play a leading role in creating a two-state solution, which will require significant compromises from both sides.” The compromise that Sanders has envisioned calls for the Palestinians to recognize Israel’s right to exist while the Israelis must end the blockade of Gaza, and cease developing settlements on Palestinian land. His campaign website said he “strongly condemned Israeli attacks on Gaza as disproportionate and the widespread killing of civilians as completely unacceptable” yet in Aug. 2014, Sanders supported the Israeli bombardment on the Gaza strip, which starting on July 8, 2014, lasted seven weeks and “claimed the lives of over 2,100 Palestinians, mostly civilians.”

Palestinian civilian lives don’t endanger the state of Israel, but Sanders’ support for Israel’s bombings on the Gaza civilian population fortifies the Zionist belief that they do. Sanders’ “solution” doesn’t account for the 6.5 million Palestinian refugees displaced worldwide nor how the current settlements have violated human rights including, “home demolitions and the forced eviction of Palestinian families; punitive arrests, unfair trials, ill-treatment and torture of detainees and the use of excessive or lethal force to subdue nonviolent demonstrations as well as the use of restrictive legal means.”

Sanders instead is convinced that the “strict adherence, by all sides, to the tenets of international humanitarian law is necessary in order to avoid escalating the conflict yet again.” Ironically it is under international law that considers Israel’s expanding settlements to be illegal and in order to avoid escalation, there needs to be urgent reparations for the Palestinian people.

It’s these reservations about Sanders that have kept me skeptical of riding into the sunset on the Bernie bandwagon. He is without a doubt the most forward-thinking candidate in terms of economic agenda, but my doubts have left me with progressive guilt.

I agree with the large majority of his platform, but the primaries are a time to force candidates to answer to the people, rather than force us into the harmful dichotomy of “for” or “against.” We should be holding a rally for Bernie Sanders not to criticize his opponents, but rather challenge Sanders to become an even better candidate. My vote remains undecided because what a white man from Vermont promises is not enough, especially after eight years of promised hope and change.

Alisina Saee-Nazari is a Collegian columnist and can be reached at [email protected]

 

7 Comments

7 Responses to “My reservations about Bernie”

  1. Nick Pappas on November 2nd, 2015 1:23 pm

    Yes, that’s what’s missing. He is too conservative.

    [Reply]

  2. Kris on November 2nd, 2015 2:11 pm

    Are you pro-stabbing Israeli civilians? Because that’s what Palestinians are resorting to, now that Israel has the ability to defend itself from rocket attacks.

    [Reply]

  3. Will on November 2nd, 2015 4:35 pm

    Good read, but I disagree with you in your allegation of his hypocrisy, or perhaps, inconsistency on middle east policy. He is firmly anti-US military action in the middle east. Air strikes, while deplorable and generally against his platform, are not military action. They’re conducted by drones, not human beings, and only recently (since Sanders’ support) have we seen new research that they’re killing more civilians than targets at shocking rates.

    Meanwhile, your only other democratic choice for the president voted for going to war in Iraq, and now wants military action (that’s what a no-fly zone is, it’s committing our air force) in Syria. Sanders is the only left wing potential commander in chief on this issue.

    I can understand the final line, and I don’t think it’s racist. My concern would be: do you realize that Hillary is more in bed with white power structures than Bernie? I too would love to elect minority representatives, but no legitimate options are available this cycle.

    [Reply]

  4. Adam Cameron on November 2nd, 2015 6:01 pm

    Good grief, a talking head in training. A national pundit on training, just what they need at the Collegian. Why don’t you stick to issues that matter, like the exorbitant cost to attend the Zoo. #SeriouslyReconsideringDonatingThisYear

    [Reply]

    David Hunt 1990 Reply:

    @Adam: I haven’t given to the Zoo since some kids took over the Collegian and, IIRC, held hostages. And the administation caved. What SHOULD have happened is the police should have gone in, dragged the perps to jail, expelled them, and filed / pressed charges.

    [Reply]

  5. David Hunt 1990 on November 3rd, 2015 8:39 am

    @Kris:

    Not just “pro-stabbing”. Those who stand with the Palestinians stand with people who:

    * Celebrated, danced, and cheered 9-11
    * Celebrated, danced, and cheered when Rabbis at prayer were stabbed to death
    * Celebrated, danced, and cheered when two murderers stabbed a three-month-old baby to death (among other children)
    * Throw cinder blocks and Molotov cocktails at driving cars
    * Name their children “Knife of Jerusalem”
    * Run TV programs indoctrinating Jew-hatred to a degree the KKK would blush
    * Name streets and squares after those who kill Jews
    * Think it’s wonderful that a young boy says he wants to be an engineer so he can build bombs to kill Jews
    * Have a store in Gaza named “Hitler” where the mannequins are shown holding knives
    * Store rockets and munitions in hospitals, schools, and mosques – certified war crimes under the Geneva convension
    * Launch missiles from schools and hospitals – another Geneva convention violation
    * Divert millions of pounds of concrete that could have been used to build schools and hospitals to, instead, build tunnels
    * Routinely discuss killing every Jew in Israel
    * Have so deep a hate that a mother, whose son is being operated on by Jews to save his life, hopes he grows up to kill Jews
    * Have, THREE TIMES, rejected an independent state offered by Israel in the West Bank & Gaza

    With someone who says “We want to kill every one of you” what, pray tell, is there to negotiate?

    @Will: So you want to elect minorities, presumably because they are minorities? Do you realize that voting for someone because of their skin color is just as racist as voting against one for that reason?

    [Reply]

  6. Arafat on November 6th, 2015 10:13 am

    As Nikolai Sennels said, a Muslim never sees himself as the cause of his own actions. It is all external reality and everything is the will of Allah or the fault of the Big Bad Infidel. Hence the eternal victimhood status, the rage, the search for external culprits, hence the jihad. You can’t expect anything else from people who are incapable of taking a long hard look at themselves and who have been told since the cradle that this look is only reserved for the infidels.

    [Reply]

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Right
Navigate Left
  • My reservations about Bernie

    Archives

    Harvard Law professor examines changing nature of media in Smith lecture

  • My reservations about Bernie

    Archives

    Free Spanish-language performances to come to Amherst

  • My reservations about Bernie

    Archives

    UMass to start, continue various construction projects in the fall semester

  • My reservations about Bernie

    Archives

    UMass Forscher Reduzieren Population Invasiver Falter

  • My reservations about Bernie

    Archives

    Season’s toughest weekend approaches for UMass men’s soccer

  • My reservations about Bernie

    Archives

    UMass football seeking statement win against Charlotte

  • My reservations about Bernie

    Archives

    New talent in the backfield crucial for UMass field hockey during conference play

  • My reservations about Bernie

    Archives

    The downfall of late night at Berkshire Dining Commons

  • My reservations about Bernie

    Archives

    Handicap inaccessible

  • My reservations about Bernie

    Archives

    Eat, you’ll feel better