Massachusetts Daily Collegian

Dear Senators, do your job

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






(Rick Wood/Milwaukee Journal Sentinel/TNS)

(Rick Wood/Milwaukee Journal Sentinel/TNS)

In light of the vacancy on the Supreme Court left by the late Justice Antonin Scalia, there’s been a lot of talk about whether or not President Barack Obama can nominate a justice during an election year. Senate Republicans said they will not hold hearings for Obama’s nominee. Various reasons are an apparent “tradition” and that the people of the United States deserve to have a say. Now, none of these reasons are cited in the constitution. And, none of them carry much weight to the problem at hand. I say to our Senators: Do your job.

The claim that there is a tradition of presidents not nominating in an election year is completely false. Yes, it is rare, but vacancies and nominations have happened during election years. Eight times presidents have nominated a justice during an election year, the most recent being Dwight Eisenhower. Eisenhower, it should be noted, nominated three justices, as many as Barack Obama would if his nominee is allowed a hearing. Yes, Obama will get to nominate three justices, but that is all due to chance. Some presidents don’t get to nominate any justices, while some get to nominate many. That was just how the Constitution was written.

The claim that the American people should have a say has nothing to do with the process. The process, according to the constitution, is that first a president names a nominee, who is then vetted by and voted on by the Senate. Congress holds the power to vet and vote on the nominee, but by refusing to even give Merrick B. Garland a hearing is going against their job description.

There is no mention of asking for the public’s opinion or taking into account the public’s opinion. The founding fathers did not trust the general public (ex. the Electoral College), so there is no mention of the public’s opinion influencing the nomination vote. But if the Republicans do want to look at public opinion, there is a current Monmouth poll. The poll says the majority of the public thinks that Garland deserves a hearing, and even more (75%) think this is a politically charged blockade. The Supreme Court nomination process is supposed to be done by government officials to find a fair judge for the bench, not used as a partisan political tool.

This claim is completely partisan and should hold no weight in going forward with Senate hearings. Nothing in the constitution says this nor has anyone followed this so-called “tradition.” Republicans that are blocking the nomination from going through are obstructing the political process just because of partisan politics.

This issue should not be solely a partisan issue. It should be a bipartisan collaboration.

“We don’t work as Democrats or Republicans and I think it’s a very unfortunate impression the public might get from the confirmation process,” Chief Justice John Roberts said just days before Scalia’s passing. The way I see it, Senators have a duty to their constituents and to their whole country to assist in picking a justice for the Supreme Court. By not doing their job, they are wasting taxpayer dollars and not being objective.

Yes, Democratic presidents usually appoint left-leaning justices, and Republican presidents appoint right-leaning justices. That’s how it goes. But Republican and Democratic presidents have had opportunities to appoint justices. And both have made nominations in their election years. The process, which has always been constant, put in place by the Constitution leaves the process up to chance and timing.

Overall, this should not be an issue. There is no legal basis and no reasoning to back up why the Senate cannot hold hearings. There is no tradition and there is no need for the public to be involved. Obama has picked a fairly moderate candidate and it would go against the constitution if the Republicans did not hear his nomination. The vacancy needs to be filled and it must be done appropriately. The Republican Senators need to do their job. If this was a Republican president versus senate Democrats, the Democrats shouldn’t be supported either. It is the job of the Senate to vet and vote on Supreme Court nominations.

Obama has gotten to nominate two other justices and frankly, that makes the Republicans mad. They do not want there to be a left-leaning majority on the court. But there always has to be majority on the Court, which was previously right-leaning. It is a fact of the American political system. The Senate needs to understand that. They need to do their jobs. So, Senate, go do your jobs.

Emilia Beuger is a Collegian columnist and can be reached at [email protected]

About the Writer
Emilia Beuger, Assistant Op-Ed Editor

Emilia was a senior and an opinion/editorial assistant. She has been working at the Collegian for two years and graduated in 2018. She hosted the opinion/editorial’s weekly podcast, Emmi Beuger’s Day Off.

4 Comments

4 Responses to “Dear Senators, do your job”

  1. David Hunt 1990 on March 23rd, 2016 9:18 am

    Look at how the SCOTUS justices vote. The Left ones vote in a block virtually 100% of the time.

    One more Leftist, anti-gun judge, and the Second Amendment goes… which triggers a civil war.

    Why refuse hearings? Because the GOP already “gets it” that several Senators are likely to defect and vote to confirm. In the ideal world, of course, this nominee should go before the Senate committee, get the Bork treatment, and get shoved out the door.

  2. David Hunt 1990 on March 23rd, 2016 9:22 am

    Your column, of course, begs the question: What do you think of the Democrats rope-a-dope delays on Miguel Estrada and Janice Rogers Brown – a “coconut” and a “oreo”, i.e., non-whites who left the Leftist plantation to be Conservative.

    Can’t have that. Everyone on the Left “knows” that minorities need to be liberal.

  3. Anon on March 23rd, 2016 11:42 am

    “He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court”.

    -If the Senate’s “advice” is to not appoint anyone right now then that is their advice.

  4. David Hunt 1990 on March 25th, 2016 1:45 pm

    Now-VP Biden, former KKK* Grand Wizard Robert Byrd, and Harry Reid all said that the Senate has no duty to even vote on a Judge. File your complaint under “Standards, Double”.

    https://pjmedia.com/blog/biden-also-gave-biden-rule-speech-in-2005-reid-podesta-were-all-for-it/?singlepage=true

    Oh, FYI, it was the DEMOCRATS who founded the KKK.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Right
Navigate Left
  • Dear Senators, do your job

    Archives

    Protest held in Amherst against forced resignation of Attorney General Jeff Sessions

  • Dear Senators, do your job

    Archives

    UMass women’s basketball suffers first loss of season to Towson, 78-53

  • Dear Senators, do your job

    Archives

    No. 9 UMass defeats No. 4 Providence, 3-2, in pivotal Hockey East sweep

  • Dear Senators, do your job

    Archives

    Anthony Del Gaizo’s game-winner Saturday the product of hard work

  • Dear Senators, do your job

    Archives

    Weiße Nationalist Flugblätter am Campus entdeckten

  • Dear Senators, do your job

    Archives

    Poor third quarter hinders UMass football in loss to BYU

  • Dear Senators, do your job

    Archives

    UMass dominant in blowout win over New Hampshire

  • Dear Senators, do your job

    Archives

    Tre Wood shines in second career game for UMass

  • Dear Senators, do your job

    Archives

    Panfletos nacionalistas blancos descubiertos en el campus

  • Dear Senators, do your job

    Archives

    Third racist incident targeting Melville Hall this semester sparks discussion forum