Massachusetts Daily Collegian

Letter: Why voting ‘yes’ on Question 3 is crucial to Massachusetts’ future

Transgender rights are being threatened

Judith+Gibson-Okunieff%2FCollegian
Back to Article
Back to Article

Letter: Why voting ‘yes’ on Question 3 is crucial to Massachusetts’ future

Judith Gibson-Okunieff/Collegian

Judith Gibson-Okunieff/Collegian

Judith Gibson-Okunieff/Collegian

Judith Gibson-Okunieff/Collegian

By Opinion and Editorial Staff

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






To the Editor,

As college students, it is our duty to be the voice of the younger generation. We have the power to shape our future through voting in elections. We will be living with the results of this November’s election far longer than the rest of the voting population, so it is especially important that we stand up for what we believe in. For me, and I hope for you as well, that includes voting “yes” on Ballot Question 3 to uphold transgender protections in Massachusetts.

I love my state. I grew up in a small town in Massachusetts and I am so grateful for the life and the opportunities that my state has given me. When I went to Tufts University and came out as transgender and non-binary, I was overwhelmed by the support I received from my friends and my school. Even in true-blue Massachusetts, however, not all transgender people are as lucky as I am. I have seen firsthand how anti-transgender discrimination can devastate someone’s physical and mental health, and as soon as I learned that there was a ballot question that threatened to legalize discrimination against transgender people, I knew that I had to do everything I could for my transgender friends and loved ones in this state.

When the Massachusetts legislature overwhelmingly passed and Gov. Charlie Baker signed the transgender non-discrimination law back in 2016, it was a major victory for our state. For the transgender community, this law made us feel heard, accepted and safe in the Commonwealth. It showed the rest of the nation that Massachusetts is a state that treats its citizens equally with dignity and respect, regardless of their gender identity.

Rolling back these protections would completely change the landscape of our state and ultimately, our country. The United States looks to Massachusetts as a model for progressivism, especially when it comes to civil rights. We were, after all, the first state to acknowledge and legalize the right for same sex couples to marry. If we decide to vote “no” and repeal protections for transgender individuals in Massachusetts, the message we send to the rest of the nation is that it isn’t important to treat transgender people with dignity and respect.

The anti-transgender activists making the case for the “no” vote are using scare tactics to try to convince the public that the safety of women and children is in jeopardy by protecting transgender people from discrimination and harassment in public spaces, particularly restrooms. That just isn’t true. Since the transgender non-discrimination law was implemented two years ago, there has been no increase in safety incidents in restrooms. Safety in restrooms is important to all of us – including transgender people. Harassing people in public facilities remains illegal and those who commit crimes are prosecuted, as they should be. The law protecting transgender people from discrimination hasn’t changed that. That’s why the state’s leading safety officials – including the Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Association and the Massachusetts Coalition Against Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence – support the non-discrimination law.

For most citizens in Massachusetts, this law does not impact them one way or the other — but for people like me, it means the world. I urge you to make sure that you are registered to vote in Massachusetts in time for the November midterm, and that you vote “yes” on 3 to uphold transgender protections.

For more information on how to get involved on campus, please contact the UMass campus contacts, Dakota DesRochers and Jamal Cumberbatch, at [email protected] and [email protected]

Ben Rutberg is a student at Tufts University.

Leave a Comment

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Left
  • Letter: Why voting ‘yes’ on Question 3 is crucial to Massachusetts’ future

    Archives

    La fundadora del movimiento ‘Me Too’ Tarana Burke habla sobre liderazgo comunitario y activismo

  • Letter: Why voting ‘yes’ on Question 3 is crucial to Massachusetts’ future

    Archives

    UMass knocked out of Hockey East Tournament by BC

  • Letter: Why voting ‘yes’ on Question 3 is crucial to Massachusetts’ future

    Archives

    Minutemen fall flat in semifinal at TD Garden

  • Letter: Why voting ‘yes’ on Question 3 is crucial to Massachusetts’ future

    Archives

    ¿Por qué ‘sé tu mismx’ es un consejo terrible?

  • Letter: Why voting ‘yes’ on Question 3 is crucial to Massachusetts’ future

    Archives

    麻州西部当局对于当地人口贩卖问题展开行动

  • Letter: Why voting ‘yes’ on Question 3 is crucial to Massachusetts’ future

    Archives

    ‘Russian Doll’: un viaje satisfactorio a través de la locura

  • Letter: Why voting ‘yes’ on Question 3 is crucial to Massachusetts’ future

    Archives

    La mémorisation n’est pas la meilleure façon d’apprendre

  • Letter: Why voting ‘yes’ on Question 3 is crucial to Massachusetts’ future

    Archives

    ‘Me Too’ founder Tarana Burke talks community leadership and activism

  • Letter: Why voting ‘yes’ on Question 3 is crucial to Massachusetts’ future

    Archives

    Western Massachusetts takes action to combat local human trafficking

  • Letter: Why voting ‘yes’ on Question 3 is crucial to Massachusetts’ future

    Archives

    UMass Mock Trial sees most successful season in program’s history

Navigate Right