BARTLETT
By: Matthew M. Robare | December 03, 2010 |
Bartlett is far and away the worst building on campus. It’s very nearly unfit for human occupancy. The bathrooms are, well, pieces of crap. At least one stall on each floor will have its lock, not broken, but removed entirely. The graffiti is notorious, the hot water never works in the sinks and at some point the toilet paper dispensers were moved closer to the toilets with the result that you must sit lopsided on the porcelain throne to drop a deuce – if you can find a stall clean enough. Many people seem to think that it’s acceptable to do their business on the floor and throw a heap of toilet paper on it. That’s not only unacceptable, it’s disgusting.
Speaking of disgusting, the heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) is atrocious. The heating doesn’t work in the winter and the ventilation doesn’t work in the summer. The air conditioning is alright, seeing as how the only unit is in 107. The vending machines also like to take your money and not give you your drink, a problem when the water fountains were broken. I’m glad the departments that call Bartlett home will be getting a new building soon. I volunteer to operate the wreaking ball machine that will demolish it.
The worst buildings on campus
—
GOESSMAN
By: Shane Cronin | December 03, 2010 |
I’m still uncertain how to pronounce it: Goessmann Laboratory. Is it pronounced like “Guess-man” or “Goss-man?” As I enter the ancient stadium seating lecture hall, I feel like I’m going to be shown a silent movie. It’s so old, I think Calculus may actually have been invented inside it. Before choosing a seat in one of the rows, I perform a brief pat down of one of the firm red cushions with stationary wooden tables attached, and I wonder, “Is this just a little harmless dust or is it anthrax?” Then I immediately remove any and all unnecessary layers of clothing. The room’s supernaturally hot temperatures are a menopausal woman’s worst nightmare. Although I am not a member of that community, I believe I’ve experienced hot flashes of the highest order at the past few Goessmann lectures I’ve attended.
Trying to find the men’s room in there is a whole other matter. So if you have a class in Goessmann and plan on using the facilities, bring a GPS with you. Better yet, just hold it. At least in the early evening the place is almost empty. Any exploration of the building will leave you feeling like you’re surreptitiously starring in an episode of the kids TV horror series “Goosebumps.” The question is this: When will the living dummies appear?
The worst buildings on campus
—
HASBROUCK
By: Naychelle Lucas | December 03, 2010 |
If you like dark, depressing or cramped spaces then Hasbrouck is the place for you. The charm and appeal of the gray lighting is only exceeded by the look of the dirt-brown panels on the walls. Perfect for any hung-over student looking to vomit. Not a fan of personal space? Don’t worry, there is absolutely no way you’ll feel comfortable sitting in Hasbrouck 124. In this ancient lecture hall, tons of desks are shoved so close together that if your neighbor has a cold you have a one-way ticket to UHS.
These seats are especially great for any student over five-foot six. If you’re lucky, for your entire class period you can sit with your knees pressed against your chest. The rock-hard chairs will have your butt numb in 20 minutes or less, and the desks are too small for an index card – but the real fun comes if you’re late to class. If the only empty desk is in the middle of the row you’re forced to sit on the stairs or twist and shimmy your way down the aisle, stepping on toes and sitting on laps the whole way down. You’ll feel obliged to buy everyone in your row dinner after this intimate encounter.
The worst buildings on campus
—
MACHMER
By: Dave Coffey | December 03, 2010 |
It’s actually sort of funny when you think about it: UMass seems to be spending the Gross Domestic Product of Poland on constructing brand-new buildings to make our campus look better to prospective students, and yet the school seems to be ignoring that a huge step in the right direction would be wiping Machmer Hall off the face of the Earth.We all had that moment in freshman year. “Hey, my first class is in some place called Machmer Hall. That sounds nice.” But wait, what’s that room number? E36? I’m a journalism major. Why do I have to do algebra to get to my room here? Whoever designed this building was clearly playing with a less than full deck. I mean seriously, if you want to have east and west wings to a building, go nuts.
But once you start working letters into room numbers, in a world of Twitter and online pizza delivery orders, you’re going to lose a few people right there. You walk in the place, and there’s perpendicular hallways that makes you wish you left for class five minutes earlier to give you time to solve this freaking puzzle. The stairways look like they’re leading you to a discount fallout shelter. Ironically, by the time you’re done staring at the crushingly depressing walls, you’ll wish the place were being nuked. And Odin help you if you’re looking for a classroom in the basement (or making a photo finish trip to the bathroom without knowing where it is). You’re more likely to find the skeleton from the class of ’07 who perished looking for his Anthro 101 discussion.
What’s the one good thing about Machmer Hall? Lots of exits.
The worst buildings on campus
—
MORRILL
By: Zachary Weishar | December 03, 2010 |
Geology, biology and microbiology are disciplines that rely upon order and efficiency. Why then is it that the academic building housing these departments has the most illogical blueprint known to man? Whether it is the random numbering system for the buildings, or the odd lay out, Morrill Science Center is easily the most confusing building on campus. After all, it is the only building with a map at every entrance. These ancient, hand drawn maps have guided countless disoriented students through the tangle of corridors that make up Morrill’s four buildings.
On top of the confusion created by lay out, Morrill is a building that has seen too many years. The most poignant example of its age are the wooden, vault-like doors dotted throughout the buildings upon which warnings of “Biohazard” and “Toxic Material” are plastered. These doors don’t look like they could keep out a cool draft, let alone isolate infectious diseases.
The worst buildings on campus
—
THOMPSON
By: Stacey Lineham | December 03, 2010 |
Is Thompson that tall building behind the library? Yeah. Well, what’s that one-floor building full of lecture halls behind the gym? That’s Thompson, too. Well then how did I walk in there and end up in Machmer? They’re connected. Is it necessary for our buildings to be confusing? Thompson’s shorter section is where classes are held and in the taller portion you can find offices. There are three rooms for the lecture halls, numbered 102, 104 and 106, but you may be surprised when you enter class late and find yourself on the stage behind your professor mortified as you enter discombobulated from trying to find the building itself. This is because there are four doors to each lecture hall and they don’t mark whether you are entering from the back or the front.
Once your seated, unless you are on the end, there is no getting up without disrupting the entire class which could be up to 306 people in room 104 or 232 people in rooms 102 or 106. This is because there is just enough leg room for an average sized individual to sit comfortably. There is no room to scoot by if you need to use the restroom during class, which brings me to my next point: The bathrooms in Thompson are located down in the basement, so unless you decide to utilize one of the two handicapped assessable, one person stalls in the Thompson Cafe area, you’re going down. One bonus point, however, for having lecture halls that are air conditioned during those hot days towards the end of the year.
The worst buildings on campus
—
TOBIN
By: Chelsea Whitton | December 03, 2010 |
Tobin Hall at the University of Massachusetts is reminiscent of either a state penitentiary with maximum security or a psych ward, despite its intentions of being “contemporary” and clean looking. It’s hard to find an entrance – apparently that adds to the appeal. Maybe the mental ward feeling is more appropriate than state penitentiary, as it houses the psych department and psychological services.
Professors’ offices are found in endlessly long white-walled hallways that make you feel like you’re stuck in a horror movie. The crumbling steps of the front entrance can be found by the back of Bartlett hall, across the street, with the entrance on the third floor. Good luck finding the room or office you intend on visiting; Tobin can make you feel like you are living a psychological thriller when trying to find classrooms or offices, but hey – it sure keeps things interesting.
The worst buildings on campus
—
HILLS
It’s so bad, we couldn’t find anyone who wanted to write about it.
Devon • Apr 21, 2011 at 5:28 am
Honestly, I don’t really have much of a problem with Hills, Bartlett, Hasbrouck, or Machmer. Sure, all four suck in their own special ways, but they also have their benefits. Bartlett has some (or, at least one) spacious lecture hall(s), Machmer and Hills are pretty average, and Hasbrouck 20 makes up for every other part of that building.
As for the bottom four…
Morrill – Construction during my 9:30 class in Morrill II all semester does suck, but nothing compares to when I tried to get to my intro Bio lab by taking a “short cut.”
Goessman – I’ve only been in it once (winter, 7pm, calculus exam), but I’ll never forget the experience. Blindly trying to find the correct room, I mistakenly wandered into what can only be described as, yes, a basement from Goosebumps. Cement walls, damp smell, the sound of a boiler, and – no joke – one flickering light….my favorite combination! The lecture halls aren’t much better, unfortunately. The upper halves of the walls were randomly lined with radiators, there was crazy steep stadium-style seating, and the whole room was overheated. Felt like I was in the twilight zone.
Thompson – First of all, let me second the terrible seating situation 102, 104, and 106. There’s nothing worse than attending an over-enrolled course held in these lecture halls. Late? Sit on the floor. Need to go to the bathroom? Hope you can hold it.
As for Thompson “proper,” the first floor is deceivingly nice. If you ever have to visit the upper floors (in search of a bathroom, perhaps?) then be prepared to step into a maze of what appear to be cluttered, dark closets.
Tobin – As a psych major, I am absolutely ashamed by Tobin. The outside is horrendously ugly and very, very unwelcoming. The inside? No better. The third floor is dark and terribly outdated. It’s void of all light – save for a tiny bit of sunlight streaming in through the doors – and the only classrooms with technology are equipped with computers that were all the rage in ’98.
On the upper floors, the floor plan changes dramatically into some kind of stark white, crazy spiral of a maze that holds dozens of cramped offices. If you’re really lucky, you’ll get to see the research floors. They’re dark, the halls are lined with old furniture and forgotten junk, and all of the doors scream ‘you’re not welcome here.’ I’ve participated in a couple of standard psych studies, but I’m pretty sure there’s some mad scientist stuff going on in Tobin.
Dr. Sean Lewi • Dec 14, 2010 at 11:53 am
No mention of the Morrill cockroach infestation?
Anysmous • Dec 13, 2010 at 6:35 pm
The worst… Tobin classroom with NO technology. I was in one class that didn’t even have working lights. NEW LOW UMASS!!!!
Anysmous • Dec 13, 2010 at 6:34 pm
This is a great editorial. I think you should send it to the two chancellors who are currently working hard (and spending our money) to convince people that UMass is the best university on earth. Maybe they could learn what is actually going on on the campus? Do they even walk around here?
Daniel • Dec 12, 2010 at 3:08 pm
Bartlett doesn’t have any type of air conditioning system, so in the summer it’s incredibly hot. But then for the winter, they only have two settings for the heat: off and HELL. Every room in that building is always too hot, except for Bartlett 65 which it seems they just forgot to add heating.
Then, if you go check out Bartlett room 301, it seems as somebody tried to open a window by kicking it and smashing it. The window wasn’t repaired for almost a month, and then they finally ‘fixed’ it by using duct tape and cardboard. All the windows either open up about in inch, or are completely painted shut.
Cave Dweller • Dec 8, 2010 at 12:20 pm
If you can’t navigate a building with letters and numbers for room designations…all i can say is good luck with with the highway system. I95 and I90 etc.
Zach • Dec 6, 2010 at 12:45 pm
It’s ridiculous that South College didn’t make this list. The building is literally falling apart at the seems. It’s become so bad that the University can’t even ignore it anymore and is attempting some sort of rebuilding on it. The building itself only house 2 classrooms, and the real joke is, people hold class in the hallways so you really can’t even reach on class from the other unless you walk outside of the building and through another entrance. It’s too hot in the summer, two cold in the winter and sucky the whole year round.
Mary • Dec 5, 2010 at 5:35 pm
I have fond memories of Hills North from my time, many years ago, as a student in the Department of Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning. Back then, everybody hung out at the Newman Center across the street. The sense of community in that department was so fine that nobody really noticed the shortcomings of the building.
Dan • Dec 4, 2010 at 10:47 pm
I think there should be another showdown regarding which academic building is the UGLIEST….. Herter takes the cake.
e.f.haddad001 • Dec 4, 2010 at 2:26 pm
I graduated from umass in 2010, and now Im living in russia. All I can say is- quite your whining!
LowLevelFaculty • Dec 4, 2010 at 11:45 am
I had my office in Machmer for 4.5 years, and I’m here to tell you that you forgot three of the worst aspects of Machmer:
1. Windows that might as well be open, they’re so drafty.
2. It’s not wheelchair accessible (despite the ramps). On several occasions, I had to tell a student in a wheelchair there was no way for him to get to that classroom on the third floor.
3. No air conditioning. The summer and early fall in that building are death.
The thing should be torn down.
GS '93 • Dec 4, 2010 at 10:12 am
The heat and lack of fresh air make Bartlett 65 a sure-fire cure for insomnia. I tried coffee, I tried soda and maybe I should have tried speed, because nothing could keep me from passing out in a puddle of my own drool in that room, regardless of what time of day it was, how interesting the material was or what professor was lecturing.
Johnny Jay • Dec 4, 2010 at 2:34 am
How did Flint not make the list? I guess no one was an HTM major.
EJC • Dec 3, 2010 at 8:26 pm
I’ve had a class in Machmer for almost every semester for the past 3 years here, and I still don’t know where the Men’s bathroom is.
steve • Dec 3, 2010 at 1:42 pm
Legal studies and Journalism major…..had majority of my classes in Bartlett and Herter both are terrible. Bartlett is soo hot if it was 80 deg or more I wouldn’t go to class
Acacia • Dec 3, 2010 at 11:06 am
Not to mention Bartlett is falling apart. The bathrooms and really the least of anyone’s worries. The heat only has one setting so when we have random warm days is a zillion degrees in there and when it’s getting cold like now there’s no heat at all. I’ve also heard that the professors’ offices have floors that are beginning to detach from the structure.
DeathtoTobin • Dec 3, 2010 at 7:40 am
I’m SO glad Tobin made this list. It’s creeped me out for years, and I hate getting stuck with a nighttime lab section. I honestly feel like there’s someone just lurking in the shadows waiting to pop out.
Rachel • Dec 3, 2010 at 3:19 am
Seriously, how did HERTER not make this list??