With April 20 marking the 16th anniversary of the Columbine shootings, it makes sense to discuss the state of gun violence and ownership in the United States.
The most recent discussion of gun violence has focused on the use of guns against people of color – in particular, police gun violence against African Americans. In light of recent events, one would assume that people of color would feel the need to own guns as a form of protection.
However, this is not the case.
Gun ownership does not mirror gun victimization. According to a Pew Research study conducted last July, 19 percent of African Americans say they own a firearm as opposed to 41 percent of whites. The reasons for this disparity may be complex but it appears that whites feel more vulnerable and in need of greater security than minorities.
Geography plays a role in these numbers, as well. Fifty-one percent of people who live in rural areas own guns as opposed to 25 percent of people who live in cities, according to the same study. The irony here is that crime takes place far more often in cities than in the countryside or small towns. However, the presence of violence in the inner cities has not prompted those citizens to buy guns.
Perhaps people in rural areas are more likely to own guns because they are wary of the government, believing that it is not there to guarantee rights so much as take them away. Perhaps it is because they live at a distance from law enforcement – a call to 911 in the countryside might result in a 20-minute wait for the police to show up.
However, I suggest urban dwellers are less likely to own guns because they more regularly interact with strangers.
City people ride the subway, take the bus and walk the streets every day next to strangers without incident. This builds a trust between people who do not know each other and makes them far less likely to believe they must be carrying a weapon at all times.
I couldn’t think of a more dangerous environment than a crowded, compact area like a subway car in which everyone is carrying a concealed weapon. Rural white Americans may be fearful of others because they just don’t cross paths with as many different types of people. Perhaps they fear, then, what they don’t know.
After shootings like the one at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012, gun purchases increased. This wasn’t because anyone thinks more guns at home would prevent another mass shooting nor did it mean people feel their lives are at greater risk. After a school shooting, politicians revisit the debate over gun control and this motivates some citizens to buy more guns for fear that the government will impose new restrictions on gun ownership.
It appears for now that gun control is off the table with Congress by the Republicans. What we know is that guns are big business and efforts to prevent the next mass shooting are going to have to confront the powerful corporations and lobbyists who profit from the right to bear arms.
Isaac Simon is a Collegian columnist and can be reached at [email protected].
other alum • Apr 28, 2015 at 11:03 pm
I am a strong proponent of gun control (different from gun prohibition) that grew up in a rural area. What I think this piece misses is that there are a lot of reasons to own a gun other than fear, paranoia, and racism. There area people who live not an hour from Amherst who feed their family for a good part of the year on game that they hunt. Even if you’re looking for a bit more diversity in your diet, guns, when operated safely and responsibly, can be a lot of fun. It’s like playing darts, but loud and exciting. At this point in my life I don’t personally own any guns, but I think it’s important for people writing on the subject to try a little harder to understand people who do.
alum • Apr 28, 2015 at 5:35 pm
A notable omission here and one that by definition cannot be clearly known is how many ILLEGALLY owned guns are present within cities. I’ll wager there are more illegally owned weapons in the high crime areas than in the suburbs. Legal owners don’t generally cause mayhem with their weapons. Some do, but they are the exception. I own guns. Legally. I am licensed to carry. Any gun control proposed targets LEGAL owners by definition. That’s why most legal owners oppose such “control” measures.
Ben • Apr 28, 2015 at 12:33 pm
Rural ownership of firearms is higher because of hunting… that is pretty obvious. There is lower ownership of firearms in cities and among black Americans is a result of state gun laws and local licensing procedure.
For instance, it is difficult to obtain a License to Carry (LTC) in the city of Boston but pretty easy to obtain this same license in Natick or Sherborn, MA. The reason for this is that when you apply for a LTC, your request must be approved by your town or city police chief, and each town or city has discretion over who they approve or deny for an LTC. I think it also may be fair to say that lower reported ownership of firearms in the black community may have something to do with discrimination in the licensing process… but this is just a guess on my part.
In terms of race and firearm violence… actual gun ownership rates have almost zero relevance to this. Gangs and other types of street violence are heavily responsible for the high rate of shootings in the black community, but very few of the firearms used to perpetrate these crimes are legally owned (most are stolen and re-sold on the street).
Next time you write an article do some analysis!
Kris • Apr 28, 2015 at 12:17 pm
Wow.