The Isenberg School of Management is painted as an exclusive club for the best-connected of the University of Massachusetts’ elite. It’s an alternate universe where classes are a piece of cake (that is, if you go in the first place), internships are handed out by daddy’s friends rather than earned, and you graduate with an impressive degree anyway.
I’m here to tell you that in my experience, it’s true.
My major, operations and information management is heavily male-dominated, much like many STEM majors, but that doesn’t make it any less painful when I talk and no one listens. My group project contributions are dismissed. I’m forced into a secretarial role, while having to force my teammates to do their part. I’ve been outcasted to the extent that I wouldn’t dream of befriending my male classmates.
Many UMass students are familiar with the Isenbro/Isenhoe trope. The nicknames themselves are a good place to start: Why do men get to be “bros” while women get stuck with a much less flattering nickname? Why can’t Isenbro be gender-neutral? The term is widely used by the UMass community, which to me indicates that the attack on women was no accident: sexism is weaved into the fabric of Isenberg’s culture. When a punchline is repeated time and time again, it doesn’t feel like a joke anymore.
It feels as though the University endorses this toxic culture by emphasizing the School of Management’s exclusivity. Students have to go through a competitive application process if they want to declare an Isenberg major, and transferring into Isenberg is no easy task either. What practical purpose does this gatekeeping serve? Gatekeeping Isenberg majors only serves to encourage Isenbros’ elitist attitudes, excluding people who genuinely want to learn business or who want to be a part of the community.
In my experience, Isenberg students are a mostly homogenous group of rich, white men. Women and people of color are chronically underrepresented in business schools across the country. Considering Isenberg’s hefty added costs, the school naturally weeds out poorer students. Common among large homogenous communities is “othering” people of the out-group.
In a 2018 study by David Eaglemen where participants were randomly assigned to groups, “fMRI imaging demonstrated that their brains still reacted with more empathy to the pain inflicted on members of their arbitrary in-group than members of the arbitrary out-group.” This suggests that Isenbros may not be “bros” when they walk in the door of the School of Management, but they learn to become them.
Students start feeling that sense of belonging as time goes on, and they start to yearn for social approval within that group. People start to identify with in-group behavior, and they don’t speak up when they notice bad behavior for fear of social disapproval. This reinforcement cycle breeds the negative behavior seen at Isenberg, including dismissing women. All this to say, culture is created through a positive reinforcement loop that all starts with Isenberg’s gatekeeping.
College typically coincides with emerging adulthood, when brain development may still be incomplete. According to NPR, “young adults become much more sensitive to peer pressure than they were earlier or will be as adults,” which is especially true for men, whose brains develop two years later than their female peers. At a time when peer pressure is at an all-time high, and we are more susceptible to it than ever, breeding a healthy culture can have a huge positive impact on students for the rest of their lives.
Isenbro culture is a problem because the behaviors college students are surrounded by shapes how they act in the real world after graduation.
Isenbros go on to become CEOs, marketing executives and investors. These men and women operate at the forefront of our society, designing powerful ad campaigns that can change the world, investing in companies whose values align with their own, and providing goods and services that have the potential to improve our lives. Isenberg culture impacts our community’s culture as a whole, and UMass wears that toxicity like a badge of honor.
Julia Oktay can be reached at [email protected] and followed on Twitter @juliadoktay.
Average Joe • Mar 25, 2023 at 10:56 am
My son got selected for Isenburg School of Business( Finance) with Honors and we are not white. This article created storm in my mind..creating doubts like, Am I sending him to right place or not? We visited college twice and very much impressed. He also got selected into Kelley(IU)..since he was born and bought up in Mass, we are preferring Isenburg than kelleys due to costs, distance and culture..after reading all comments, now I feel better,Thanks to all comments..please stop writing big articles on small issues and don’t be hyper sensitive with every small issue? BTW, that doesn’t mean that I support any discriminatory behavior. Please think positive, that goes a log way. There was old saying “If your mouth is good entire village will be good!”, have a nice day and take care.
Buddy the elf • Jan 25, 2022 at 2:45 pm
This is such a chronically online point of view. I suggest you go touch grass if you are so out of touch with the fact there are much bigger issues to be solved.
Alan Sanchez • Jan 3, 2022 at 2:00 am
They let anyone write these days, eh?
James Samuel • Dec 8, 2021 at 6:50 am
Does the author know that Susan Fournier studied at UMass and got her undergraduate degree from Isenberg School and is a female who is currently serving as the dean of Questrom School of Business at Boston University.
Jason • Dec 1, 2021 at 5:43 pm
Such a shameful attempt to tear down one of our state’s most affordable yet high quality business schools that is full of hardworking students and faculty. I’m not sure what classes you are taking, but it could not be further from a “piece of cake.” And the opportunities (which you probably lack with this attitude) are not “handed out,” but earned by hard working students, often with help from the Chase career center and plenty of other brilliant resources that the school offers. You are miserable!
Anonymous • Dec 1, 2021 at 12:56 pm
I really hated this article, it was super negative and most was false, coming from another female who is one of their majors is business.
Amanda • Nov 30, 2021 at 11:47 am
How can you accuse a school of elitism and toxicity when your opening line was a generalization that every student was handed their opportunities rather than getting them through hard work?
You had an opportunity to shed some light on some very real issues in Isenberg (sexism and exclusivity is a very real problem), but instead you came off as out of touch and bitter, and polarized the very people who could have actually supported you in this topic. What a miss.
John • Dec 8, 2021 at 11:24 pm
I earned my BA from SOM in 1984 and MBA from SOM in 1986 and this opinion piece is weird. Weird I say. And I am unanimous!
Joe • Nov 29, 2021 at 9:12 pm
Someone got rejected from IUCG…
Jefferson Steelflex • Nov 29, 2021 at 12:40 pm
This article is an absolute joke. I don’t know what you were trying to achieve looking down upon a school at UMass but it was an utter failure. Piss poor journalism.
Varghese Jacob • Nov 29, 2021 at 8:12 am
Dear Julia,
Isenberg SOM is a great business school and insulting the school where you will get your degree is a great disservice. The undergraduate BBA on-campus program and BBA degree completion program (UWW) are both challenging as they both have the same courses, same credits, and same challenges. Even for the degree completion program, you can’t get admitted unless you study and get good grades in gatekeeper courses and have a good GPA.
It is my own view, as an international and as degree completion student, that Isenberg SOM needs to be more elite. We cant drop to the bottom half of business school in the USA or the world. The competition is between the best. We have to be in the top 10 rankings.
If you want to know what being elite is and what elitism is, why don’t you study at MIT (Sloan), Wharton (UPenn), Ross (UMich), NYU (Stern), Haas (Berkely), Tepper (CMU), Kelley (IU), Kenan Flagler (UNC). These schools offer undergraduate business degrees and it is also tough either getting admitted as a freshman from high school or a transfer student as internal or external.
Speaking of history to put things in perspective. The University of Oxford was established in the year 1096 and the University of Cambridge was established in the year 1209. However, since the establishment of these two universities, no women were awarded degrees or were even members of faculty or even study or get a degree there. It was after the University of London that started to award degrees to women in the year 1878. Cambridge+Oxford started awarding degrees to women only from the year 1920.
Additionally, even in the great USA women were only allowed to vote from 1920, though the country was founded in 1776. Where was and what was the status of the white women then?
Injustice is everywhere. In Massachusetts, HBS is elite. Isenberg also can be the public university’s elite. You don’t have to drown the entire business school down due to your narrow vision of the world.