Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

Athletics should be celebrated at UMass

Athletics are not a waste of resources
(Abigail Charpentier/Daily Collegian)

This semester, an article was published in the Massachusetts Daily Collegian discussing why athletics should receive less funding from the University since there is little success within our sports teams and a lack of support from the University of Massachusetts student body. The article went on to make several points as to why UMass Athletics does not deserve our money or time investments as students.

As a former collegiate athlete at UMass, a sport management major and an intern for UMass football, it was disappointing to witness a classmate tear down everything that UMass Athletics has worked so hard for.

These are some points in response to the original article:

UMass Athletics has seen great success, not only in its history with greats such as Julius Erving and Marcus Camby as prominent Athletics alumni, but in recent years as well. Most notably, UMass hockey reached the Hockey East Playoffs this year. Men’s soccer made a trip to the NCAA tournament in 2017. Field hockey consistently makes trips to the NCAA tournament. Women’s lacrosse just came off of a 61-game win streak in conference play, which comes to eight years and four days without a conference loss. Men’s lacrosse is currently ranked No. 16 by the NCAA, and coaching legend Elaine Sortino led the softball team to three appearances in the Women’s College World Series.

In his article, Aidan Byrne compared UMass to the University of Texas but there are a few reasons why this is ridiculous in terms of understanding the growth of UMass Athletics. Byrne highlighted that Texas generated $182.1 million in 2017, but those numbers are highly skewed. The University of Texas has a long tradition of money thrown into the athletics department by the numerous wealthy alumni. This comes from the fact that Texas is a prestigious school, accepting around 17 percent less applicants than UMass. Furthermore, the student body size is roughly double that of UMass. More students equals more money. In addition to this, wins and losses don’t always mean that an FBS program turns a profit. In an article posted by the NCAA in 2015, only 24 FBS programs operated in the black.

Title IX compliance is another issue with the previous article. The writer stated that club programs that “instill University pride” such as Zoodisc, the men’s ultimate frisbee team, should be receiving more University funding than some Division I teams. However, adding a team is much more complex than just giving them a bus, jerseys and some money. This team has to directly reflect the representation of the campus population and with the already established men’s teams carrying large rosters, this would strain Title IX compliance for UMass. In addition to this, a program that instills University pride is a bit of a reach, considering many students were not aware of such a team on campus.

“Our student athletes are out there competing for [the UMass students]…I hope that students will come out to support their peers who are putting in countless hours of work,” said Alan Pandiani, Associate Athletic Director overseeing sales and fan experience in an interview early this week. And that is true. The average student athlete dedicates 35 hours a week to their sport alone. “All we are trying to do for everyone here—students, faculty, alumni—is make them proud to be associated with this institution,” Pandiani later added. “We want athletics to bring everyone together.”

I also sat down with the president of The Militia, Jacob Barnes, to get his take on the support of UMass Athletics by the student population.

“UMass Athletics and the Militia have teamed up and worked tirelessly to get the place we want to be in providing a fantastic and memorable student experience. Groups like the Sons of Liberty have helped tremendously as well. The potential is there; you just have to look back a few short weeks to the UVM Hockey East playoff series. Winning is coming soon and it is going to be magical. You better watch out because you just woke up a sleeping giant.”

Fan attendance has grown across the board for UMass Athletics, but it was most apparent this past season for hockey, totaling 25,000 strong in student attendance through the playoff game against Vermont. As teams continue to dominate in their conferences and in the postseason, these numbers will only grow in the years to come.

Athletics was critical in my decision to come to UMass. When it came time to hang up the cleats, I chose to stay here. It felt like home even when I was nearly 2,000 miles away from my true home of Dallas, Texas. I am confident that no other institution could give me as positive of an experience as UMass has. It is mindsets like that of this writer that disrespect the hard work and dedication that varsity athletes put forth to make their peers and fans proud. I know that I will be proud to bring my family back to Amherst one day, winning or losing, because of the resiliency found within UMass athletes.

Madison Sadler is a Collegian contributor and can be reached at [email protected].

View Comments (6)
More to Discover

Comments (6)

All Massachusetts Daily Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • B

    borisMay 4, 2018 at 11:58 am

    tremendous article!

    GO U!

  • A

    Adz KozlowskiMay 3, 2018 at 9:51 am

    Outstanding comeback article!

  • J

    Joyce WascomApr 30, 2018 at 3:08 pm

    Well stated and researched, Ms. Sadler. Athletics are not the focus, but they enhance the college experience.

  • R

    Ryan McKinneyApr 30, 2018 at 11:51 am

    For the most part UT Austin doesn’t have higher athletics revenue because it’s “more prestigious”. Rather it’s because their athletics have been supported at the highest level in a major conference for over a century. This has generated a positive feedback loop that has led to national success (success builds infrastructure and attracts recruits/building strong high school programs that lead to further success). UT Austin had a 40,000 seat football stadium by 1926. Compare that to UMass who spent 117 decades in divisions lower than the university’s institutional peers. Even to this day, while UMass is an FBS member and plays in a multi-bid conference for basketball, the revenue generated from that status pails in comparison to our institutional peers in the Power Five conferences. However it is good enough for our revenue to be within the top third of the Group of Five conferences.

    UMass is where it is because of decades of neglect from the state. I’d encourage you to read the late Prof. Wiarda’s book “Universities in Decline” before. He acknowledges deemphasizing UMass FROM THE START. This was due to many factors but I recount some startling ones (to me).

    1. Harvard politicians being threatened by a state university
    2. MIT convincing the state to share its land grant funds with them
    3. Mismanagement from administration, from the establishment of a medical campus (and no law school… died before Dartmouth) to the lack of emphasis on athletics (criticizing UMass’ College Division, DII, and DI-AA years)

    On the note of the prestige of UT Austin, I hope you do not to fall into the trap of the phenomenon that Dr. Wiarda recognizes as UMass’ inferiority complex. While UMass has centuries of neglect to recover from, we’ve come a long way and now we aren’t so bad after all. Currently we stand among the Top 30 public universities in the country, that’s among the top 2-3% of all American universities.

    If we could just get into the top half of US schools’ admissions yields (% of accepted students who decide to enroll; median is 33% and UMass is at 20%) we could drop our acceptance rate to 35%. If we could increase our yield to 40%, a standard that even the least prestigious and academically meager institutions of the Power Five conferences achieve, of we could drop our acceptance rate to 29%. That’s among the commonly referred to public ivies.

    UMich – 26.3%
    UVa – 29.8%
    UNC – 30.5%
    Georgia Tech – 32.2%
    UT Austin – 39.2%
    William & Mary – 34.5%

    • R

      Ryan McKinneyApr 30, 2018 at 12:03 pm

      *pales in comparison

  • T

    Tom MassetiApr 30, 2018 at 9:33 am

    You make some excellent points about the athletics and academics , , ,they should go hand in hand . I’m so glad that some people realize that the athletic teams on campus are the “front porch” of any academic institution. Under Ryan Bamford we’ve started winning again in many sports and the near future looks great. Thanks for your views coming from a student athlete perspective!