Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

UMass needs to cultivate class awareness through economic diversity

Economic diversity cannot be ignored
(Collegian file photo)
(Collegian file photo)

The University of Massachusetts prides itself on academics, diversity and inclusion, with students who recite the mantra, “Hate has no home at UMass,” on laptop stickers, in group dialogue and in everyday conversation. But students, in my experience, also perpetuate classism as an economic opinion and discrimination as a form of free speech. As a member of the privileged poor, I have been forced to justify my existence to the advantaged in subtle interactions and commonplace situations. My narrative was deemed counterfeit – a world of survival made null by those whose privilege pushed me to question the validity of my experiences. In a year where UMass has suggested it has admitted its “most academically accomplished and diverse first-year class,” economic diversity is once more left out of the conversation.

I am at a campus party. The voices of the party-goers drown out my inner monologue in a sea of music. Conversations of relationship drama, exam dates, homework stress, food choices and vacation destinations attack my senses; I freeze – suffocated by a level of privilege that I both hold and fear as a low-income, previously homeless, first-generation college student. My heart rate quickens as sweat pours down my forehead. I stare around the crowd, unable to move.

I hear their worries, transfixed with my own of survival and necessity. I see my tear-stricken family of nine on that day, six years ago, when we lost our home and were thrust into homelessness.

I remember the numbness of perpetual hunger – a consequence of the hotel-living diet of microwavable chicken pot pies and gravy sandwiches – as someone talks of their love for Berkshire lobster and crème brûlée.

I hear of their family trips to Italy and France. My far-cry equivalent – a trip to a local Showcase Cinemas – was my only escape from the confines of our hotel prison. Homelessness and food insecurity shaped my childhood reality and reverberations have impacted my college experience. While still recognizing the privilege that I hold as a student, I cannot help but feel as if my low-income class identity and experiences are under scrutiny, amplified by a lack of economic diversity at UMass.

In a time of rampant wealth inequality and economic insecurity, higher education should act as an equalizer, providing opportunity for lower-income and disadvantaged persons alike to transcend their socioeconomic backgrounds. However, as tuition continues to rise and competitive testing standards become the norm, the institution has begun to systemically reinforce economic and racial privilege in a cycle that spans generations.

As an Educause Review article remarks: “More college completion among white and affluent parents brings higher earnings. Higher earnings buy more expensive housing in the leafy green suburbs with the best schools and peer support for educational attainment. The synergy between the growing economic value of education and the increased sorting by housing values makes parental education the strongest predictor of a child’s educational attainment and future earnings.” This is also furthered by the process in which the upper-middle class can hinder mobility and worsen structural inequality through the use of clout to secure generational advantage, such as in the case of using family connections to secure internship opportunities.

The UMass claim of academic accomplishment and diversity is not unfounded, notably with increases in the ALANA and underrepresented minority populations. However, while these are strides toward creating a more inclusive and diverse campus for all students, economic diversity and dialogue on the intersectional nature of the identities within beyond such, is once more disregarded. Impeded by ever-competitive standards of admission and progressive tuition increases, low-income and working-class students of many identities and experiences lack equitable opportunity to attend the University.

While this is largely impacted by the lack of state funding for the UMass system, the race to be named a top-20 public university fails to properly take into account the marginalized communities that will be left behind through fee increases and selectivity. The U.S. News ranking guidelines rooted in this competition impact “colleges’ admission decisions and financial priorities,” reinforcing the “deeply ingrained assumption that the more a school spends — and the more elite its student body — the higher it climbs in the rankings.” In this way, the average grade point average of the UMass class of 2022 is now a 3.90, and that of the Commonwealth Honors College a 4.29. While the University should aim to foster a student body of academic excellence, the economic realities of prospective students should be further stressed in the admissions process.

These admissions decisions affect the presence or absence of economic diversity on-campus, as the UMass system is pushed to appeal to students of privilege to best support the University and reinforce its selectivity – and the consequent rise in rankings. At the same time, the University fights to retain its title of No. 1 dining in the spirit of rank – pricing out students with expensive meal-plan prices, limiting opportunities for food-insecure students and perpetuating exclusion on-campus.

With a lack of economic diversity comes a culture of classism, as the realities of lower-income students are devalued by both university systems and student life that cater to the needs of the privileged. Beyond providing a means of social mobility, UMass should aim to recruit students of financially disadvantaged backgrounds, for which it already has shown a commitment. As they must follow through with their intentions and aim higher, the experiences of these students will be legitimized and supported – fostering greater class awareness and dialogue alongside the equitable recruitment of students of all socioeconomic backgrounds.

Timothy Scalona is a Collegian columnist and can be reached at [email protected].

View Comments (3)
More to Discover

Comments (3)

All Massachusetts Daily Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • A

    amySep 20, 2018 at 6:53 pm

    Umass doesn’t care about poor people, or any diversity except for a racial one. Although it will take a while to realize, the college we go to is essentially a racist college and the left/liberal ideas that dominate it are racist.

    Diversity is only based on race, those who get into umass who are non-european do so merely on the basis that they are not white and rarely based on merit. A recent study came out that if colleges applicants were based on merit; over 70 percent would be Caucasian/European descent, 25 percent Asian, 4 percent Hispanic, 1 percent black.

    And so what does racial diversity do to the poor? What does it do to the formerly homeless? What does it do to the lower class? What does it do to the many other people who face inequality? It excludes them.

    Stay tuned.. I and some other students are working on a student bill of rights that would give power back to the students and public over umass and state colleges so that we can make them more equal.

  • B

    Bitter LemonSep 20, 2018 at 12:36 pm

    Great article! Keep up the great work and advocating for Students! Be the change you want to be. And ignore people like Ed Cutting up in here. We all know people like them come from privilege.

  • E

    Ed Cutting, EdDSep 20, 2018 at 7:12 am

    The point to remember is that there are more White Americans living in poverty than there are Black Americans. The NAACP pointed that out 20 years ago in the midst of Clinton’s Welfare Reform initiatives, and it hasn’t changed.
    But don’t blame the state for UMass being expensive — the state has actually increased the UMass budget over the past 20 years — it’s just that UMass has increased its spending even more. WAY more…. Hence while the *percentage* of the budget that the state provides has decreased, that’s only because the UMass budget is so much larger now.
    Like all these new buildings, and new administrators with six figure salaries — that sort of stuff starts adding up after a while…
    Jack Welch of GE graduated from UMass in 1957 — in his autobiography, he said he went to UMass “because it only cost $50 a year” — that would be $457 today. And to show how much UMass has changed, in many ways, there were students back then who used to hunt (and eat) squirrels on campus — yes, with guns, although not near the buildings.
    And back then, many of the buildings were surplus WW-II (and WW-I) barracks that had been hauled in from Fort Devens. UMass wasn’t fancy back then, but it was far more diverse…