Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

Elizabeth Warren refuses to admit she will raise middle-class taxes

It’s a simple yes or no question
Collegian File Photo

One of Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s signature and most controversial policies is the Medicare for All plan that she borrowed from Sen. Bernie Sanders.

According to Warren’s own impassioned statements on the bill, middle-class healthcare costs will go down, as the government will foot the bill for their medical coverage. However, as any rational person would understand, this plan would cost a lot of money. In fact, the proposal would cost a total of $34 trillion over the next decade. That figure, according to The Atlantic, is “more than the federal government’s total cost over the coming decade for Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid combined.”

With Warren’s insistence that she has a plan for everything, you would think she would be forthcoming in her plan to pay for the bill. However, Warren keeps demurring the question of whether she will have to raise middle-class taxes to pay for Medicare for All. On debate night, Warren repeatedly refused to answer the simple yes-or-no question: “Will you raise taxes on the middle class?” In what Warren undoubtedly believed to be sly political maneuvering, but is really just side-stepping the question, she stuck to her guns, declaring, “I will not sign a bill into law that raises costs on middle-class families.”

Warren is not an idiot. She knows that the question is not about costs — it is clearly about taxes. She believes the fact that taxes will increase on the middle class is not an issue because total costs for healthcare will drop. Thus, her answer leaves the viewer wondering if she even heard the question.

Sanders has the same plan as Warren. Indeed, Warren admitted that Bernie’s plan is the “golden standard” in healthcare plans. Unlike Warren, Bernie is honest about his policy — during a debate in June, he readily admitted that middle-class taxes would have to go up in order to pay for Medicare for All.

Other Democratic contenders have pointed this out. The debate last Monday featured several contentious moments, including when Mayor Pete Buttigieg called out Warren for her refusal to meet “a yes-or-no question” with “a yes-or-no answer.” Similarly, Sen. Amy Klobuchar suggested that Warren should be honest about “where we’re going to send the invoice” for her policy – namely to the middle class. Warren insists that her so-called “wealth tax” will pay for the policy, but according to her own website, this would only provide $2.75 trillion over the next ten years – not even 10 percent of what Medicare for All will cost. This is on top of her already extensive list of policy priorities that are similarly expensive, such as forgiving most student debt and providing massive childcare subsidies.

With Warren facing all this criticism, it is worth speculating her rationale. One plausible explanation is that if she wins the primary election, President Trump’s team would attack her in campaign advertisements if she admits that she wants to raise taxes.  This may be true, but her strategy of avoiding the question altogether makes her look even more dishonest than she would otherwise.  If she admitted to the requisite tax hikes, Trump would be facing a wild-eyed progressive with far-reaching policy objectives, but at least she would be viewed as honest.

I see Warren’s refusal to answer this question as a manifestation of the worst forms of politics. Politicians depend on voters — the last thing they want to hear is that their taxes will increase, or that candidates’ policies have any downsides whatsoever. This forces politicians to act as if their policies are trade-off free.

This is one reason why our politics are so toxic. Every policy has trade-offs; while many voters may not want to hear that, politicians know it well. If Warren simply laid out all of the negative aspects of her policies, such as increasing taxes on the middle class, at least a debate could then be had on the merits and demerits of her specific proposals. This is as true on the right as it is on the left, but Warren should heed this advice the most.

Greg Fournier is a Collegian Columnist and can be reached at [email protected].

View Comments (3)
More to Discover

Comments (3)

All Massachusetts Daily Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • J

    joey dOct 22, 2019 at 2:35 am

    Yes VAT is not a tax and free money for everyone!!!!!!!!!!!! Yang for president!! He is the best democrat!

  • J

    JeffreyOct 21, 2019 at 6:35 am

    Vote for Andrew Yang. He won’t increase taxes. He will use a VAT on Amazon, Google, Facebook, and other tech companies who are currently not paying taxes to give us all a freedom dividend of $1,000 a month for starters., As well as free healthcare.

  • J

    joey dOct 21, 2019 at 3:00 am

    90 percent of Americans have insurance provided by their employer so why is government insurance necessary to the extent democrats/far left propose it?

    One could make an argument for healthcare for the very poor which already exists,medicaid and you could argue well lets improve it. Democrats aren’t saying that ,they are saying health insurance for everyone including those who don’t need it or want it.

    First we have already seen government healthcare on a national level, the affordable care act or ‘obamacare’ and it was failure, it didn’t bring down the costs, it provided largely low-quality healthcare and it was expensive. Also it wasn’t popular..probably because most people already have health insurance.

    I think democrats/far left have an agenda which they aren’t honest about. Their agenda is to force Americans to adopt government insurance and to expand the government into insurance so our country becomes more reliant on the government and closer to a socialist country.

    Thankfully Elizabeth Warren won’t win and its highly unlikely any democrat will win, because the democrats have failed to support a competent viable contender to Donald Trump and all of their candidates except Joe Biden(which the far left does not support) are far left and extreme.

    That’s the drawback I guess of being extreme, you lose.