Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

A free and responsible press serving the UMass community since 1890

Massachusetts Daily Collegian

The triggering: We need a productive conversation about political correctness


Political correctness is simply defined by Merriam Webster’s dictionary as “agreeing with the idea that people should be careful to not use language or behave in a way that could offend a particular group of people.”

It is a wonderful concept that we are taught from a very young age. I don’t remember much from my kindergarten years, but I do recall what the “golden rule” of my classroom was. Right above the chalkboard was a poster with the words, “Treat others the way you would like to be treated,” literally written in gold lettering to drive the point home.

From the time we start interacting with other children, we learn the virtues of being a good person: share, play nice, don’t call people names, etc. We may not be taught about political correctness as five-year-olds, but the concept is more or less the same. However, for whatever reason, adults have forgotten those concepts.

Political correctness is no longer the “golden rule.” Many believe that we, as a society, have taken political correctness too far, to the point where we are too overly sensitive and need to put too much thought into every statement that we make in order to not offend someone. Some people believe that this new obsession with political correctness is limiting our freedom of speech.

Last week, I found out there was an event that the University of Massachusetts GOP will be hosting on April 25 titled, “The Triggering: Has Political Correctness Gone Too Far?” This event will feature a panel of Christina Hoff Sommers, Milo Yiannopoulos and Steven Crowder, where they will have the floor to discuss the issue of being “too politically correct.”

Sommers, a former philosophy professor turned author, is most well-known for her criticism of modern-day feminism, with published works like “Who Stole Feminism? How Women Have Betrayed Women” and “The War Against Boys: How Misguided Feminism Is Harming Our Young Men.”

Yiannopoulos, a journalist and entrepreneur, has equally controversial views such as his takes on rape culture and misogyny, both of which he believes are falsehoods created by feminists. Yiannopoulos is also famously known for funding a scholarship exclusively for white males intending to go to college.

Crowder, a former contributor for Fox News, is well-known for his comedic YouTube channel, featuring videos where he discusses his views on politics, feminism, gay and trans rights and terrorism, including one video titled “Moderate Islam: A MYTH!,” where he dons a turban and pulls up quotes from “the original ISIS member: Mohammed, himself.” (quote at 3:22).

You don’t have to know very much about UMass to know that this event has sparked an enormous amount of controversy. Not only are people upset by the fact that this panel discussing political correctness is made up entirely of whites who, for the most part, all share the same views, but this event is also coming soon after the UMass campus has witnessed a series of homophobic, racist, anti-Semitic and Islamophobiac messages being spread.

With all of this hatred being expressed recently, a discussion about political correctness is relevant. However, UMass is a diverse campus, with students and faculty who hold different religious beliefs and who are from different backgrounds. Holding a panel on the topic of political correctness where the only speakers are white conservatives is undeniably limited, despite the fact that one of the panelists is a woman and one is a gay man, as supporters of this event were quick to mention.

Unfortunately, I can’t imagine this panel discussion being much of a discussion at all. In order to have a discussion about something as important and controversial as this topic, you must have opinions from both sides. Because of the lack of representation on this panel, students are already discussing protesting the event.

I understand why people are frustrated. However, as Americans, these speakers have the right to say and publicize their opinions, just as I have the right to say and publicize mine. Instead of protesting the event and refusing to listen to the other side, I believe that it is important that people with differing views from the panelists actually go to the event. Again, not to protest or to make a scene, but to listen.

We as a society cannot grow if we remain unwilling to intellectually discuss opposing views with one another. To those of you who don’t agree with what will be discussed at this event, I encourage you to go, listen and when the time is right, present your differing opinion. You will almost certainly not change anyone’s opinion, but you may finally start the discussion that this panel should be having in the first place.

Tess Halpern is a Collegian columnist and can be reached at [email protected].

View Comments (5)
More to Discover

Comments (5)

All Massachusetts Daily Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • B

    Brian ManganMay 2, 2016 at 1:39 pm

    I’d like to pose a question to the writer of this article?

    What percentage of the UMass tenured professorship self identifies as conservative. I’m very curious.

  • M

    Mark KayeApr 26, 2016 at 2:30 pm

    I’m curious to know how many conservatives have positions in the Sociology department at UMA?

    If they truly believed in diversity the answer should not be zero which i strongly suspect it is. I would be happy to find out i am wrong.

  • D

    Dillird ThurmanApr 26, 2016 at 11:45 am

    Political Correctness is not polite conversation – it is a pathologizing of those on the Right ,by those on the Left, and elevating the speech of those who dare speak out against the left as acts of violence. It’s shouting down and hurling insults at anyone who dares to speak ideas and views that run contrary to the prominent Leftist narratives. It is not a conversation at all, since, it appears from the “the Triggering” event, that they are not capable of even simply allowing another viewpoint to be presented at an event intended for just that purpose, without trying to shut it down. These students are incapable of calm rational discussion or analysis, and are more like ideological bullies than anything else.

    Another name for Political Correctness, coined by writer Jonah Goldberg, is “Liberal Fascism.” Which apparently is a very accurate term.

  • M

    MICHAEL JOHNSONApr 26, 2016 at 11:29 am

    I always find the argument that these panels are faulty because they’re not ‘diverse’ enough, but when a liberal(s) speak at such venues, there is NO outcry from the liberal side of the political divide for more politically diverse representation at those events. So typical.

  • M

    Mark KayeApr 13, 2016 at 2:05 pm

    You will agree I hope that liberty is one of the values of American Exceptionalism. At least the founders thought so even if it is not in vogue today to pay homage to the concept, especially among “progressives” and increasingly among the current stock of GOP contenders, which perhaps Cruz as the only outlier.

    What does liberty mean and what rights does she endow us with?

    As a business owner do i have any right to refuse service?
    As a property owner do I have any right to refuse to rent?
    As a money owner do I have any right to refuse to spend?
    As a weird off the wall, even bizzare opinion holder, do i have any right to be “incorrect?”

    How far are we from room 101, Winston?